Nowak

1. Wrong section
2. Ampere is not confirmed yet, nor is it confirmed that the 2000 series will be the next Nvidia series. Volta is next in the pipeline, meanwhile.

1. Wrong section
2. Ampere is not confirmed yet, nor is it confirmed that the 2000 series will be the next Nvidia series. Volta is next in the pipeline, meanwhile.

1. Wrong section
2. Ampere is not confirmed yet, nor is it confirmed that the 2000 series will be the next Nvidia series. Volta is next in the pipeline, meanwhile.

How and where did you find 16GB RAM for US$95?!

Not 100% sure, but I believe it's from when I was upgrading my PC; specifically, after my slow ass spent 4 hours trying to brute force on the CPU cooler. I noticed part of my wrist really hurt right after.
 
It hurt in the same spot the doctor said the tear is in (based on MRI results.) If anyone's wondering what specifically I tore, here ya go.

Well, I found out I did indeed tear part of my wrist on Thursday, and now I'm waiting for the doctor to call me back so he can schedule surgery so I can get that fixed.

What's up, LGBT thread? Just got home from the doctor; found out I tore part of my wrist c:

Ew.
 
That's all I need to say.

Federal regulations require me to tell you that you are lookin'... pretttttty good.

Ew.
 
That's all I need to say.

Ew.
 
That's all I need to say.

If I were able to fully ditch this "Daring" name (which is attached to a fandom I left almost 4 years ago), that'd be great.

Yeah, it's still pretty shitpost-y.

If I were able to fully ditch this "Daring" name (which is attached to a fandom I left almost 4 years ago), that'd be great.

It was frozen and I was hungry, and it takes hours for it to thaw out.

It's easy. You put a chocolate-glazed one in the microwave to heat it up, then, in your haste to eat it, you immediately put your hand on the donut. Had to go to the hospital with second-degree burns after that.

I bought chocolate-glazed donuts today. They're the same kind of donuts I burned my hand on.
 
Thankfully I'm not a stupid kid anymore, I'm a stupid adult now :^3 Let's hope I don't burn myself, again.

I bought chocolate-glazed donuts today. They're the same kind of donuts I burned my hand on.
 
Thankfully I'm not a stupid kid anymore, I'm a stupid adult now :^3 Let's hope I don't burn myself, again.

I bought chocolate-glazed donuts today. They're the same kind of donuts I burned my hand on.
 
Thankfully I'm not a stupid kid anymore, I'm a stupid adult now :^3 Let's hope I don't burn myself, again.

Sauce: http://thehill.com/policy/technology/370133-montana-becomes-first-state-to-implement-net-neutrality-rules-following-fcc
 
As we all know by now, the FCC, led by known industry shill Ajit Pai, voted to repeal net neutrality rules federally last month. In a move going against this decision, Montana governor Steve Bullock has signed an executive order reinstating net neutrality rules within the State of Montana, while also requiring ISPs to be compliant with net neutrality rules if they wish to continue doing business within the state.
 
 
To justify this move, governor Bullock stated that this is a "simple step states can take" and that we can't wait for DC to "come to their senses and reinstate these rules." So, onto what the order says.
 
Basically, in order for an ISP to do business in Montana, it must not block or throttle web content or create paid "fast lanes", in attempt to manipulate what an end user can see online. Ah, but wait, there's the ban on states implementing their own rules, which Democrat state legislatures are challenging.
 
Further, Democrats are pushing for legislation in Congress that will overturn the FCC vote, as well as pushing for laws on the state level. This stems from the argument that net neutrality is an essential part of keeping ISPs, like Verizon and Comcast, under check; most Republicans disagree with this argument.
 
 
Governor Bullock says that while the rules will go into effect immediately, there will be a grace period for ISPs to ensure they're compliant. He is also inviting the 49 other state governors to do the same, going as far as promising to personally send a copy of his order to any governor who wants a copy.
 
The governor concluded with the following:
 
Thoughts? Concerns? Screams of agony? Personally, I'd be glad to see Comcast lose their contract with Montana. Hit 'em right where it hurts, right? Maybe then they'd feel a bit more like actually being a good, reliable, trustworthy ISP. I'd also like to see Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker be first governor to follow in Bullock's steps. It only makes sense for us to do so.
 
Oh, and btw, keep it civil.

Yeah guys, remember the Community Standards. Put your political flamethrowers aside.
 
I know this is a politically-charged topic, but still. Remember the human. The Vulpix too.

Perhaps because it's a much bigger state than Rhode Island, and thus not as densely populated  
 
But I do know there are some Montanans active on here. So, they definitely are out there.

Sauce: http://thehill.com/policy/technology/370133-montana-becomes-first-state-to-implement-net-neutrality-rules-following-fcc
 
As we all know by now, the FCC, led by known industry shill Ajit Pai, voted to repeal net neutrality rules federally last month. In a move going against this decision, Montana governor Steve Bullock has signed an executive order reinstating net neutrality rules within the State of Montana, while also requiring ISPs to be compliant with net neutrality rules if they wish to continue doing business within the state.
 
 
To justify this move, governor Bullock stated that this is a "simple step states can take" and that we can't wait for DC to "come to their senses and reinstate these rules." So, onto what the order says.
 
Basically, in order for an ISP to do business in Montana, it must not block or throttle web content or create paid "fast lanes", in attempt to manipulate what an end user can see online. Ah, but wait, there's the ban on states implementing their own rules, which Democrat state legislatures are challenging.
 
Further, Democrats are pushing for legislation in Congress that will overturn the FCC vote, as well as pushing for laws on the state level. This stems from the argument that net neutrality is an essential part of keeping ISPs, like Verizon and Comcast, under check; most Republicans disagree with this argument.
 
 
Governor Bullock says that while the rules will go into effect immediately, there will be a grace period for ISPs to ensure they're compliant. He is also inviting the 49 other state governors to do the same, going as far as promising to personally send a copy of his order to any governor who wants a copy.
 
The governor concluded with the following:
 
Thoughts? Concerns? Screams of agony? Personally, I'd be glad to see Comcast lose their contract with Montana. Hit 'em right where it hurts, right? Maybe then they'd feel a bit more like actually being a good, reliable, trustworthy ISP. I'd also like to see Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker be first governor to follow in Bullock's steps. It only makes sense for us to do so.
 
Oh, and btw, keep it civil.

I've grown partial to eastern European sausages, like kiełbasa.

Sauce: http://thehill.com/policy/technology/370133-montana-becomes-first-state-to-implement-net-neutrality-rules-following-fcc
 
As we all know by now, the FCC, led by known industry shill Ajit Pai, voted to repeal net neutrality rules federally last month. In a move going against this decision, Montana governor Steve Bullock has signed an executive order reinstating net neutrality rules within the State of Montana, while also requiring ISPs to be compliant with net neutrality rules if they wish to continue doing business within the state.
 
 
To justify this move, governor Bullock stated that this is a "simple step states can take" and that we can't wait for DC to "come to their senses and reinstate these rules." So, onto what the order says.
 
Basically, in order for an ISP to do business in Montana, it must not block or throttle web content or create paid "fast lanes", in attempt to manipulate what an end user can see online. Ah, but wait, there's the ban on states implementing their own rules, which Democrat state legislatures are challenging.
 
Further, Democrats are pushing for legislation in Congress that will overturn the FCC vote, as well as pushing for laws on the state level. This stems from the argument that net neutrality is an essential part of keeping ISPs, like Verizon and Comcast, under check; most Republicans disagree with this argument.
 
 
Governor Bullock says that while the rules will go into effect immediately, there will be a grace period for ISPs to ensure they're compliant. He is also inviting the 49 other state governors to do the same, going as far as promising to personally send a copy of his order to any governor who wants a copy.
 
The governor concluded with the following:
 
Thoughts? Concerns? Screams of agony? Personally, I'd be glad to see Comcast lose their contract with Montana. Hit 'em right where it hurts, right? Maybe then they'd feel a bit more like actually being a good, reliable, trustworthy ISP. I'd also like to see Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker be first governor to follow in Bullock's steps. It only makes sense for us to do so.
 
Oh, and btw, keep it civil.