woll3

I would actually rather suggest something lightweight or at least soemthing with reasonable weight for TF2.

iirc it has something to do with some sort of Mcafee endpoint encryption, it would fit as Intel and McAfee are one.

Colour of illumination isnt an indication of the illumination method. Which is actually using PAW3309, an Office Sensor.

^this, because its A5050.

TBH the bigger problem are the office grade components, the Devastator for Example uses PAW3309 and Kaiche switches(more here: http://adrenaline.uol.com.br/forum/threads/review-mouse-cm-storm-devastator.543692/), how people are satisfied with that is beyond me. EVGA TorQ X3 + Sharkoon Skiller Pro are one option.

? Both Sensei and Sensei Raw are using A9500 for navigation. *G402 uses AM010.

Here we go again.... Zowie costs the same while using cheaper components. Also 9 years would have counted but not 5. ^^

Im no expert on 3d printing but i think you are severely limited design wise in comparison to injection molding, also you need the capability to print with ABS.

Cable, Lighting and Sensor, PMW3366 is adjustable in Steps of 50, while AM010 is adjustable in steps of 80, which is what gave it away.

You have a G302, not a 303, just saying.

Firmware

I mentioned it in another thread, this is exactly the problem, there is more to it than just soldering some ic in, the FW of the 3090 RAT3 isnt good and neither was the LED choice, not to mention that the assembly is kind of off as well so the light is rather unfocused in comparison.

Well, no surprise given Kingsis shelldesign.

Well, i explained why, the MCU used is below budget tier and the firmware is basically a lag script.

Well, that is acceptable, altough weird, as the best price here in middle europe is ~50€ atm. Just keep in mind thzat it is rather heavy and unbalanced for its size and that its sensor is barely usable above 1000cpi.

Which doesnt change the RAT 3´s rather poor performance caused by bad FW and LED Choice.

Actually, in terms of performance the DA(Freescale S08 + 3989) is above the Zowie´s(Cypress + 3310) and the Rival (Freescale S08 + 3310), as it also has good FW in comparison. However when we are only talking pure performance, nothing can beat Logitech, FW game is on another level.

I doubt that, imo most consumers would then just say "f**k it" and go for a cheaper ambidextrous option, the Kiro itself is a good example, 60€ for an A3050 is just insanely high, and unless there is some sort of commitment beforehand, as a brand i wouldnt even start a lefthand only mouse, a good example is the Deathadder which obv. changed its PCB Design from 3.5g to 4g to one without dedicated sidebutton PCB, so a brand new pcb would have been needed to accomodate sidebuttons on the right which apparently wasnt deemed as a feasible option.

Would advise against it anyway considering the pricepoint, which is just ridiculous.

No reason to not believe them? There have been lies from day one, which happened under the old brand called Feenix as well. Also there wouldnt be a need to change Details on the Homepage if they wouldnbt have been caught. As for the weight: http://www.overclock.net/t/1586719/finalmouse-2016-worth-the-wait#post_24765861 Crappy bought in OEM Shell, bought in Firmware that adds delay, internals are poverty tier. Also define lightweight, if it is 90g and under then things like the CM Alcor and TorQ X5o comne to mind.

76g is the official weight for the new one, which might not be true either, when you click on the "Classic Ergo" you can see how they rephrased it to "At 74 grams pre-cabling" after being called out, reports say its around 90g, but nobody has weighted it while taking pictures, not that it matters as it is trash overall anyway.

Which isnt 76 grams.

PMW3320, it is also based on an OEM Design which is for example used by the Fühlen CO300.

Issues, no not really, it does what it does, however the problem is what is done with it, 3310 is actually newer than 3988 and is simply a nerfed version in a different casing meant as the entry to the mid end, while practically the only real difference are FPS it is imo a downgrade as it has an impact on cursor behaviour above 1m/s. So imo the only two acceptable cases to use 3310 over 3988 are either a lower priced product(which the Naos isnt) or if a company doesnt have the means to use 3988(which laview is able to). Using 3310 and interpolation for 70€ is imo not acceptable. As for "issues", every A9800 has the same anyway, that being smoothing. Are they? DA Chroma´s Street price is the same as Naos 7000´s. Also in regards to Zowie i just have to mention Kingsis.

What issue? Thge 3310 is just an inferior version of 3988 inside a 20-dip casing, altough one could actually argue that all A9800 variants are crap. Not to mention that Razer's FW capabilities are better than nearly everyone elses.