Jump to content
37 minutes ago, Pixel5 said:

if you got money to burn go for it and stay in the rat race but it doesnt really make sense.

I am also leaning towards that position. Most bells and whistles in a games graphics settings don't impact my experience for the most part. And most of the games I play don't require a lot more graphical power. I wonder what intels cards will be like. Nvidia needs more competition. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Id stick with the titan X for a while longer, this generation of nvidia cards seems like a shady stopgap generation and i dont think the performance difference would be worth the cost

maybe get a second titan x if you can find one cheap, for SLI capable games that would probably work out really well for the price

 

i say wait to see what intel can push out in 2020 or the NEXT next nvidia generation

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 2080 ti is on backorder. By the time you will be able to get one the reviews will be out.

 

I play at 3440x1440 as well. With a GTX 1080 ti, I am over 100fps with high settings or better in most of the games I play. I am not planning to upgrade the GPU until there are 144hz 3440x1440 monitors.

My other computer is connected to 4k monitor. Performance is not great with a GTX 1080 ti but I am getting over 60fps in most of my games. I will upgrade when affordable 120hz monitors come out.

 

I am basically waiting for monitors that are not on the market yet.

 

The raytrace thing is meaningless to me. I am a retired 3d graphic artist. I have been raytracing since the mid 80s. I used techniques that 3D game designers use to bring down rendering times. A casual eye could not tell the difference between my pure raytraced images & the ones I faked. Sometimes I could not tell.

 

I would rather have the frame rate than the raytracing.  

 

  

RIG#1 CPU: AMD, R 7 5800x3D| Motherboard: X570 AORUS Master | RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 32GB DDR4 3200 | GPU: EVGA FTW3 ULTRA  RTX 3090 ti | PSU: EVGA 1000 G+ | Case: Lian Li O11 Dynamic | Cooler: EK 360mm AIO | SSD#1: Corsair MP600 1TB | SSD#2: Crucial MX500 2.5" 2TB | Monitor: ASUS ROG Swift PG42UQ

 

RIG#2 CPU: Intel i9 11900k | Motherboard: Z590 AORUS Master | RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 32GB DDR4 3600 | GPU: EVGA FTW3 ULTRA  RTX 3090 ti | PSU: EVGA 1300 G+ | Case: Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO | Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 | SSD#1: SSD#1: Corsair MP600 1TB | SSD#2: Crucial MX300 2.5" 1TB | Monitor: LG 55" 4k C1 OLED TV

 

RIG#3 CPU: Intel i9 10900kf | Motherboard: Z490 AORUS Master | RAM: Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 32GB DDR4 4000 | GPU: MSI Gaming X Trio 3090 | PSU: EVGA 1000 G+ | Case: Lian Li O11 Dynamic | Cooler: EK 360mm AIO | SSD#1: Crucial P1 1TB | SSD#2: Crucial MX500 2.5" 1TB | Monitor: LG 55" 4k B9 OLED TV

 

RIG#4 CPU: Intel i9 13900k | Motherboard: AORUS Z790 Master | RAM: Corsair Dominator RGB 32GB DDR5 6200 | GPU: Zotac Amp Extreme 4090  | PSU: EVGA 1000 G+ | Case: Streacom BC1.1S | Cooler: EK 360mm AIO | SSD: Corsair MP600 1TB  | SSD#2: Crucial MX500 2.5" 1TB | Monitor: LG 55" 4k B9 OLED TV

Link to post
Share on other sites

These benchmarks show that Titan X Pascal is consistently about 60-70% faster than Titan X Maxwell at 3440x1440.

 

Looking at raw specifications of 2080 Ti I think a 30-60% improvement is definitely feasible over Titan X Pascal at such a high resolution.

 

So potentially 2080 Ti being double as fast as Titan X Maxwell at 3440x1440.

 

We'll see when the benchmarks and reviews are released!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×