Jump to content

[Video] Stock AMD THREADRIPPER 2990wx(32c/64t) VS 2 Dual Xeon Platinum P8136 (56c/112t) x15 speed - Test Render

tuhdo
By tuhdo
in General Discussion
 Share
Posted

Here is the video:

 

Could Linus do a similar video but using 1 Xeon Platinum instead of 2?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Just double the time the Xeon Plats used. These tasks scale perfectly with core count so you can just use the power of math.

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
6 minutes ago, tuhdo said:

Here is the video:

 

Could Linus do a similar video but using 1 Xeon Platinum instead of 2?

Linus has 8180s i think

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
4 minutes ago, Jurrunio said:

Just double the time the Xeon Plats used. These tasks scale perfectly with core count so you can just use the power of math.

No becuase there is some overhead with 2 sockets and not all the cores were being used like in the beginning only half were at 100%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
10 minutes ago, Firewrath9 said:

No becuase there is some overhead with 2 sockets and not all the cores were being used like in the beginning only half were at 100%.

Precisely that's why I want to see a single Xeon Platinum vs 2990WX for the most accurate result. And I do hope the 2990WX to exceed :)

 

The overhead is minimal compared to the workload done when the 2nd CPU is fully utilized. So, I guess it's likely the Xeon Platinum will be slower than the 2990WX when it's alone by itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

The Xeon P8136 was the same CPU Linus got scammed on eBay for. It still doesn't even show up on Intel's ARK listings.

I'm completely confused about this CPU lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
6 minutes ago, t4ils said:

The Xeon P8136 was the same CPU Linus got scammed on eBay for. It still doesn't even show up on Intel's ARK listings.

I'm completely confused about this CPU lol.

It's not really a scammed CPU. It is in fact a Xeon Platinum CPU final release before the retail version: https://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/paul-taylor/alleged-skylake-ep-on-sale-at-ebay/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing General Discussion

×