Jump to content

Hi Everyone,

 

I have been saving up some money recently, and would like to upgrade my system. 

 

Current Specs:

 

RX 470 @1300 MHZ 

Ryzen 5 1600 @3.8GHZ

16GB Dual Channel @2400MHZ

AsRock AB350 Pro4

EVGA 600B PSU

256GB SSD

1TB HDD

Acer GN246HL 144hz Monitor

 

I was thinking that currently the weakest link would be the graphics card, as my main use case is Gaming (Fortnite, Overwatch, Warframe etc)

It does pretty well at 144hz in these games, but i need to drop the detail down to low in fortnite to sustain the 144 fps.

I was thinking of upgrading to either a 1080, or waiting for the next generation of Nvidia card.

 

If you think that there is somewhere else in my system that should be upgraded instead, or if the the ryzen 5 1600 will bottlneck the 1080, please tell me.

 

Thanks. 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/956626-upgrading-and-bottlenecking/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GoldenLag said:

Get a freesync monitor? Then you dont have to worry about hitting 144hz. 

Sorry, I didn't put this right, I would like to upgrade my Performance for maxing out games, which the RX 470 is not currently able to do, while still keeping 144fps, i understand that a freesync monitor will help with keeping games smooth, but being being over 144fps is always going to be smoother than 80fps with freesync.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rane_ said:

Sorry, I didn't put this right, I would like to upgrade my Performance for maxing out games, which the RX 470 is not currently able to do, while still keeping 144fps, i understand that a freesync monitor will help with keeping games smooth, but being being over 144fps is always going to be smoother than 80fps with freesync.

Smoother, yes. Better? Depends in who you are asking. Games will allways have FPS drops and freesync will negate that and remove any tearing.

 

2 minutes ago, Rane_ said:

I do actually!

A 1070 will serve you nicely. Though i would suggest Vega 56. Sell the 470 for a bit extra budget and get a freesync monitor. You will get the best of both worlds.

 

The 1070 option will offcourse be cheaper

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GoldenLag said:

Smoother, yes. Better? Depends in who you are asking. Games will allways have FPS drops and freesync will negate that and remove any tearing.

 

A 1070 will serve you nicely. Though i would suggest Vega 56. Sell the 470 for a bit extra budget and get a freesync monitor. You will get the best of both worlds.

 

The 1070 option will offcourse be cheaper

Right, noted. also, i just looked it up and the 1070 ti is actually slightly cheaper than a vega 56 where i live, would you recommend the extra $30 or so to get the ti version? and then later on think about investing in a g-sync monitor? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1070ti?

CPU: i7-2600K 4751MHz 1.44V (software) --> 1.47V at the back of the socket Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 (BCLK: 103.3MHz) CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15 RAM: Adata XPG 2x8GB DDR3 (XMP: 2133MHz 10-11-11-30 CR2, custom: 2203MHz 10-11-10-26 CR1 tRFC:230 tREFI:14000) GPU: Asus GTX 1070 Dual (Super Jetstream vbios, +70(2025-2088MHz)/+400(8.8Gbps)) SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB (main boot drive), Transcend SSD370 128GB PSU: Seasonic X-660 80+ Gold Case: Antec P110 Silent, 5 intakes 1 exhaust Monitor: AOC G2460PF 1080p 144Hz (150Hz max w/ DP, 121Hz max w/ HDMI) TN panel Keyboard: Logitech G610 Orion (Cherry MX Blue) with SteelSeries Apex M260 keycaps Mouse: BenQ Zowie FK1

 

Model: HP Omen 17 17-an110ca CPU: i7-8750H (0.125V core & cache, 50mV SA undervolt) GPU: GTX 1060 6GB Mobile (+80/+450, 1650MHz~1750MHz 0.78V~0.85V) RAM: 8+8GB DDR4-2400 18-17-17-39 2T Storage: HP EX920 1TB PCIe x4 M.2 SSD + Crucial MX500 1TB 2.5" SATA SSD, 128GB Toshiba PCIe x2 M.2 SSD (KBG30ZMV128G) gone cooking externally, 1TB Seagate 7200RPM 2.5" HDD (ST1000LM049-2GH172) left outside Monitor: 1080p 126Hz IPS G-sync

 

Desktop benching:

Cinebench R15 Single thread:168 Multi-thread: 833 

SuperPi (v1.5 from Techpowerup, PI value output) 16K: 0.100s 1M: 8.255s 32M: 7m 45.93s

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rane_ said:

Right, noted. also, i just looked it up and the 1070 ti is actually slightly cheaper than a vega 56 where i live, would you recommend the extra $30 or so to get the ti version? and then later on think about investing in a g-sync monitor? 

That would be a good option. Just keep in mind G-sync monitors are way more expencive than freesync ones. You will be paying 100-200 extra for the exact same. (Or more depending on which G-sync)

 

If the 1070ti is cheaper tham the vega then go for it. Vega is equivelent or the same to a 1070, it is worth it if it is only a little bit more than a 1070. Just keep in mind what i mentioned above. 

 

Personally id pick up a Vega, but i am partial to AMD, and i allready own a freesync monitor. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jurrunio said:

1070ti?

Released a while ago. It sits between the 1070 and 1080. And can be overclocked to match a stock 1080. My guess they released it to counter the mining market and hit the Vega 56 as it was a tiny bit faster than a 1070

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, GoldenLag said:

That would be a good option. Just keep in mind G-sync monitors are way more expencive than freesync ones. You will be paying 100-200 extra for the exact same. (Or more depending on which G-sync)

 

If the 1070ti is cheaper tham the vega then go for it. Vega is equivelent or the same to a 1070, it is worth it if it is only a little bit more than a 1070. Just keep in mind what i mentioned above. 

 

Personally id pick up a Vega, but i am partial to AMD, and i allready own a freesync monitor. 

Yeah it is pretty annoying that Nvidia force their strict specifications for all of the g-sync monitors but i guess it means that you'll never get a bad G-sync monitor, just an expensive one. Another problem is that finding stock for vega's can be kinda hard (unless amd have recently improved stock). Thank you for your help though, also do you think that a 1070 ti and ryzen 5 1600 make a good combo for high detail 1080p gaming?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Rane_ said:

Yeah it is pretty annoying that Nvidia force their strict specifications for all of the g-sync monitors but i guess it means that you'll never get a bad G-sync monitor, just an expensive one. Another problem is that finding stock for vega's can be kinda hard (unless amd have recently improved stock). Thank you for your help though, also do you think that a 1070 ti and ryzen 5 1600 make a good combo for high detail 1080p gaming?

It wil indeed. The GPU will power through most games. 1600 will hold it a bit back in some titles, but is to be expected. You have the option to dl a CPU upgrade 2 years from now. Which i believe will be the next upgrade step

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GoldenLag said:

It wil indeed. The GPU will power through most games. 1600 will hold it a bit back in some titles, but is to be expected. You have the option to dl a CPU upgrade 2 years from now. Which i believe will be the next upgrade step

Great, thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×