New pc Build

[Brooksie359]

20 minutes ago, Veltn said:

But wasn't the ryzen 7 better at streaming over the i7 and the only difference was the clock speed and core by that I mean lower clock speed more cores

also if you want to notify someone that you have reponded to their comment you have to quote them using the arrow button at the bottom of their comment or @them like this @Veltn

[knightslugger]

16 minutes ago, Brooksie359 said:

you wont have an issue with streaming with the 10 core because it has enough cores to game and stream. that being said for video editing and content creation the 16 core thread ripper will destroy the 10 core while I don't think the 10 core will be all that better in gaming performance. the 7700k had a hard time with streaming because it didn't ha enough multi-threaded performance to stream while gamine because of it only being a 4 core vs an 8 core.

exactly right. the i7 delivered more frames to the GPU than the R7, but because of the multi-tasking potential of the R7 due to higher core count it won out over the i7 for that specific workload. if it were only gaming, the i7 is a better choice, but because streaming is involved, both Ryzen and i9 processors will do a better job. Now when comparing which will do multi-tasking better, specifically simultaneous streaming and gaming (which is being asked here) the i9 is the better choice because it will game better than Threadripper as it has a higher clock ceiling. But for strictly video editing performance, threadripper wins.

 

to throw another wrench in there, cost for performance can be a factor that flips the tables! but if you already have the budget for a 7900X or a 1950X:

If you need gaming performance bias: 7900X

If you need rendering performance bias: 1950X

 

it's really that simple.

[Brooksie359]

1 minute ago, knightslugger said:

exactly right. the i7 delivered more frames to the GPU than the R7, but because of the multi-tasking potential of the R7 due to higher core count it won out over the i7 for that specific workload. if it were only gaming, the i7 is a better choice, but because streaming is involved, both Ryzen and i9 processors will do a better job. Now when comparing which will do multi-tasking better, specifically simultaneous streaming and gaming (which is being asked here) the i9 is the better choice because it will game better than Threadripper as it has a higher clock ceiling. But for strictly video editing performance, threadripper wins.

 

to throw another wrench in there, cost for performance can be a factor that flips the tables! but if you already have the budget for a 7900X or a 1950X:

If you need gaming performance bias: 7900X

If you need rendering performance bias: 1950X

 

it's really that simple.

yes but the disparity in gaming is not going to be as high as the disparity for work oriented tasks probably. we will have to wait for reviews but if they can get the 16 core to 4ghz then it is quite likely the 16 core would make more sense for better overall performance.

[knightslugger]

19 minutes ago, Brooksie359 said:

yes but the disparity in gaming is not going to be as high as the disparity for work oriented tasks probably.

I guess we shall see what kind of time penalty exists when the NDA ends. I can only speculate that threadripper 1950X will be double an 1800X in multi-threaded workloads but similar to the 1800X in single threaded workloads and that the 7900X will only beat it in single threaded use.

 

you heard it here first friends.

[Veltn]

Welp i went and got the threadripper  since i saw the performance from the alienware one and i can deal with the cooling issue with a better cooler then the alienware one uses