Jump to content

6600k -> 7700k with GTX 1080 ti

Hey guys.

 

Long time lurker here, finally decided to make a profile :)

 

So partly because of our dear Linus' advice I opted to get an i5-6600k for my build back in the end of December, to go with my GTX 1070

 

A lot have changed since then, since I decided to take advantage of EVGA's step-up programme to get an 1080 ti FE. I also got a 165gz 1440p monitor to take full advantage of the card.

 

So now I'm thinking that the processor isn't quite up to par with the rest of the build. I've seen many people, particularly on this forum, that argue that the i5 6600K will be a slowing down a powerful graphics card in games

 

So my question is: Should I upgrade to a 7700K, Is it even worth it considering the around 200€ I'll end up spending? Also should I get an 6700K instead, considering all the thermal issues you hear about with the 7700K? I'm not really into delidding my CPU. 

 

Currently my 6600K is OC'd to 4.6 GHz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usually it depends on the game you play. If the game supports more than 4 cores, the I7 would gain a little. 

Main System:

Anghammarad : Asrock Taichi x570, AMD Ryzen 7 5800X @4900 MHz. 32 GB DDR4 3600, some NVME SSDs, Gainward Phoenix RTX 3070TI

 

System 2 "Igluna" AsRock Fatal1ty Z77 Pro, Core I5 3570k @4300, 16 GB Ram DDR3 2133, some SSD, and a 2 TB HDD each, Gainward Phantom 760GTX.

System 3 "Inskah" AsRock Fatal1ty Z77 Pro, Core I5 3570k @4300, 16 GB Ram DDR3 2133, some SSD, and a 2 TB HDD each, Gainward Phantom 760GTX.

 

On the Road: Acer Aspire 5 Model A515-51G-54FD, Intel Core i5 7200U, 8 GB DDR4 Ram, 120 GB SSD, 1 TB SSD, Intel CPU GFX and Nvidia MX 150, Full HD IPS display

 

Media System "Vio": Aorus Elite AX V2, Ryzen 7 5700X, 64 GB Ram DDR4 3200 Mushkin, 1 275 GB Crucial MX SSD, 1 tb Crucial MX500 SSD. IBM 5015 Megaraid, 4 Seagate Ironwolf 4TB HDD in raid 5, 4 WD RED 4 tb in another Raid 5, Gainward Phoenix GTX 1060

 

(Abit Fatal1ty FP9 IN SLI, C2Duo E8400, 6 GB Ram DDR2 800, far too less diskspace, Gainward Phantom 560 GTX broken need fixing)

 

Nostalgia: Amiga 1200, Tower Build, CPU/FPU/MMU 68EC020, 68030, 68882 @50 Mhz, 10 MByte ram (2 MB Chip, 8 MB Fast), Fast SCSI II, 2 CDRoms, 2 1 GB SCSI II IBM Harddrives, 512 MB Quantum Lightning HDD, self soldered Sync changer to attach VGA displays, WLAN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea should probably have written that in the OP.

 

I plan to play AAA(Witcher 3, ME: A etc.) titles as they are released. I also play a lot of Overwatch atm. I can become CPU performance capped in Overwatch if I lower the graphics settings to high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

An i7 is a much better option than i5 in games moving forward, frame times are a tonne better already

 

Ryzen Ram Guide

 

My Project Logs   Iced Blood    Temporal Snow    Temporal Snow Ryzen Refresh

 

CPU - Ryzen 1700 @ 4Ghz  Motherboard - Gigabyte AX370 Aorus Gaming 5   Ram - 16Gb GSkill Trident Z RGB 3200  GPU - Palit 1080GTX Gamerock Premium  Storage - Samsung XP941 256GB, Crucial MX300 525GB, Seagate Barracuda 1TB   PSU - Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W  Case - INWIN 303 White Display - Asus PG278Q Gsync 144hz 1440P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd recommend the 6700k, since you probably aren't switching the mobo for z270 you won't get any new features from the 7700k and yeah the 7700k runs a bit warm, they OC about the same though 

desktop

Spoiler

r5 3600,3450@0.9v (0.875v get) 4.2ghz@1.25v (1.212 get) | custom loop cpu&gpu 1260mm nexxos xt45 | MSI b450i gaming ac | crucial ballistix 2x8 3000c15->3733c15@1.39v(1.376v get) |Zotac 2060 amp | 256GB Samsung 950 pro nvme | 1TB Adata su800 | 4TB HGST drive | Silverstone SX500-LG

HTPC

Spoiler

HTPC i3 7300 | Gigabyte GA-B250M-DS3H | 16GB G Skill | Adata XPG SX8000 128GB M.2 | Many HDDs | Rosewill FBM-01 | Corsair CXM 450W

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies all.

 

Yea I'm defintely keeping my z170 mobo. The reason for getting the 7700k would be to take advantage of the overclocking headroom. Won't be much to take advantage off if it's runs really hot though... Still not sure what to do.

 

Maybe I should just wait for the next cycle of CPUs instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rasmuskrj said:

Thanks for the replies all.

 

Yea I'm defintely keeping my z170 mobo. The reason for getting the 7700k would be to take advantage of the overclocking headroom. Won't be much to take advantage off if it's runs really hot though... Still not sure what to do.

 

Maybe I should just wait for the next cycle of CPUs instead.

You would get away with the i5, but as has been pointed out above would still need to upgrade sooner rather than later anyway. Counterintuitively, you will be more likely to get away with the i5 at higher resolutions as they become more GPU bound, but it will still definitely be less than optimal, especially at such a high refresh rate.

 

If you're going to upgrade, there isn't really any point in going with a 6700K over a 7700K. The 7700K won't run any hotter at a given frequency, but the fact that it can go higher exposes a flaw that is in the design of both CPUs, which wasn't really noticeable on the 6700K due to its lower overclocking headroom.

 

You could wait for newer CPUs, but you will be waiting a while. The next Intel CPU launch will be of the KBL-X and Skylake-X processors, but will only be on the X99 platform, so you would have to get a new motherboard with one of these CPUs.

 

Give the i5 a try, and see if it suits your needs. If it doesn't, 7700K is your only real upgrade path without a new motherboard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your thoughts. I am of course aware that the i7 7700k will be an upgrade in performance over the 6600k. As some of you point out frame times and minimum FPS is where I'll see the most improvement, and I some games there wont be any improvement at all. Interestingly, even though people keep saying that The Witcher 3 is a CPU intense game, I'm seeing the same performance with my 6600k as with a 7700k ( at 1440p, haven't tested 1080p).

In Overwatch though I am seeing some pretty massive framerate dips (from 240 -> 150), but I can't really say it's something I'm percieving as I play.

 

I guess what I want to know is: If it were your stuff and your money, would you upgrade?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

So what was the verdict ? I have a GTX 1080 Ti and a i5 6600k @ 4.5 and have a constant 100% on all cores @ 4k in a few titles and really want to know if the 7700k will help that 100% issue im seeing .

Also i have a Hyper D92 cooling my 6600k that is @ 1.3 v to achieve to 4.5 keeping it at a 60C max . Will it keep the 7700k @ stock temps under control .

Ive already updated my Bios on my AsRock Z170 Extreme 4 Mobo and seeing worse performance on the 6600k with this bios , previous bios i had 4.5 with only 1.2 v .

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, 2ndLastJedi said:

So what was the verdict ? I have a GTX 1080 Ti and a i5 6600k @ 4.5 and have a constant 100% on all cores @ 4k in a few titles and really want to know if the 7700k will help that 100% issue im seeing .

Also i have a Hyper D92 cooling my 6600k that is @ 1.3 v to achieve to 4.5 keeping it at a 60C max . Will it keep the 7700k @ stock temps under control .

Ive already updated my Bios on my AsRock Z170 Extreme 4 Mobo and seeing worse performance on the 6600k with this bios , previous bios i had 4.5 with only 1.2 v .

 

Naturally it only makes a difference once you are limited by CPU performance rather than GPU performance. And that mostly only happens once you get near 100fps(depending on the game of course).

I'd say that when playing on 4K you would almost always be GPU limited even with a 1080ti, unless you're playing something like CS:GO. You could of course have a lot of stuff running in the background, in which case a 7700k would help. If you have your CPU 100% usage at all times during gaming, this seems to be a likely scenario.

 

Cooling a 7700k is... interesting. I have a custom loop with a EKWB Supremacy Evo cooling my CPU and if I OC it with 1.3V it runs at 80+C while gaming. Through research I've learned that the only thing to do to get this thing to run cool is to delid it. I probably wouldn't expect to be able to OC it with a Hyper D92. It will probably be kinda hot even on stock speeds, but I'd guess still within bounds.

 

All this being said, another option would be for you to wait right now. The new Coffee Lake CPU's will be coming out soon which will give you 2 more cores and 4 more threads, albeit at a lower clock speed. This requires you to buy a new motherboard though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive just decided to get a Noctua NH-D14. I just feel that my 6600k isn't really a good match for my 1080Ti and would really prefer to keep my Mobo and a 7700k/1080Ti pairing should last me a few years of Sim Racing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The i7-7700k is currently the best CPU for gaming, and it might even still be after the Coffee Lake CPUs since they're lowering the clock speeds. So if you feel like you have the money then go for it. Whether or not it is worth the money for you is harder to guarantuee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×