Jump to content

Why NOT to get the 760/770 4GB

TechSage

Linus should investigate this :) 

| CPU: i7 3770k | MOTHERBOARD: MSI Z77A-G45 Gaming | GPU: GTX 770 | RAM: 16GB G.Skill Trident X | PSU: XFX PRO 1050w | STORAGE: SSD 120GB PQI +  6TB HDD | COOLER: Thermaltake: Water 2.0 | CASE: Cooler Master: HAF 912 Plus |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll see about this...

Does this call for a tech quickie?

Memory bus, speed, and capacity

There are 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this call for a tech quickie?

Memory bus, speed, and capacity

No, this calls for me to go mod a game and get my 760 using more than 2GB of VRAM. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, this calls for me to go mod a game and get my 760 using more than 2GB of VRAM.

Alright, let's see.. It may use around 2-2.5 but it won't go higher than that.

There are 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Interesting... Then why they made 4gb versions of those cards?

for people, that don't research there cards and Just think more is better ;) 

CPU: Intel Core i7 4790k CPU Cooler: Corsair H100i Chassis/Case: Fractal Design Arc Midi R2  Motherboard: Asus Z87-Deluxe RAM:  Team Vulcan 2x4Gb(2133Mhz)  Video Card: Asus 7970 Direct CU II Custom Rom (150% Power, 1100 core 6Ghz Memory)  Power Supply: Fractal Integra R2 750 Watt  Keyboard: Cooler Master Quick Fire Rapid (MX Blue Switches)  MouseCorsair M90 Storage: SX900 128Gb, Seagate 1TB 7200RPM, WD Green 1TB 7200RPM   MY OLD BUILDLOG


The Fastest 8350 @5.33Ghz with a score of 9.16pts in Cinebench 11.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting article:

http://alienbabeltech.com/main/gtx-770-4gb-vs-2gb-tested/3/

 

It seems there's no difference between them

| CPU: i7 3770k | MOTHERBOARD: MSI Z77A-G45 Gaming | GPU: GTX 770 | RAM: 16GB G.Skill Trident X | PSU: XFX PRO 1050w | STORAGE: SSD 120GB PQI +  6TB HDD | COOLER: Thermaltake: Water 2.0 | CASE: Cooler Master: HAF 912 Plus |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

if what OP is saying is true, then I'm glad I got the 2GB version :)

Specs of my PC:

CPU: AMD FX 8350  Motherboard: Gigabyte 990XA UD3  GPU: Gigabyte GTX 770 Windforce 2GB  HDD: WD Green 2TB SSD:  Corsair Force GT 120GB SSD RAM: Corsair 8GB(2X4) PSU: CoolerMaster G650M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

if what OP is saying is true, then I'm glad I got the 2GB version :)

Yep, there's no need to get 4gb version, as you see there is difference only 1-2 fps :)

| CPU: i7 3770k | MOTHERBOARD: MSI Z77A-G45 Gaming | GPU: GTX 770 | RAM: 16GB G.Skill Trident X | PSU: XFX PRO 1050w | STORAGE: SSD 120GB PQI +  6TB HDD | COOLER: Thermaltake: Water 2.0 | CASE: Cooler Master: HAF 912 Plus |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, there's no need to get 4gb version, as you see there is difference only 1-2 fps :)

yay :)

Specs of my PC:

CPU: AMD FX 8350  Motherboard: Gigabyte 990XA UD3  GPU: Gigabyte GTX 770 Windforce 2GB  HDD: WD Green 2TB SSD:  Corsair Force GT 120GB SSD RAM: Corsair 8GB(2X4) PSU: CoolerMaster G650M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting article:

http://alienbabeltech.com/main/gtx-770-4gb-vs-2gb-tested/3/

 

It seems there's no difference between them

all within margin of error because the games treat both cards as 2gb models since it cannot use the extra 2GB effectively since it needs to be able to access all of it at the same time.

AMD Ryzen 5900x, Nvidia RTX 3080 (MSI Gaming X-trio), ASrock X570 Extreme4, 32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB @ 3200mhz CL16, Corsair MP600 1TB, Intel 660P 1TB, Corsair HX1000, Corsair 680x, Corsair H100i Platinum

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea... is a hiding rule... but is a rule for us  B)

 

but we don't talk of that, is tabu lol  :ph34r:

 

 

 

128b x 1GB = full use 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know what to do now =( I was planning on getting a GTX 770 4GB for my surround setup, but with this info I don't know how. I want a Nvidia card for Shadowplay reasons, but I can't afford a 780. Should I just go for a 2GB version? I currently have a GTX 650 2GB and it doesn't take up all the VRAM when I run games in surround, soo.....

You know ShadowPlay cannot capture your surround footage (to my knowledge)? You need to be playing at 1080p which is why I couldn't record when I was at 1600p. I need to test this though so don't quote me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

My epic paint skills, now if the bus is smaller the memory needs to be faster to cope with the Bus size bottle neck. Ignore the "but bus" spelling mistake. :')

post-11045-0-38556000-1387630816_thumb.j

AMD Ryzen 5900x, Nvidia RTX 3080 (MSI Gaming X-trio), ASrock X570 Extreme4, 32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB @ 3200mhz CL16, Corsair MP600 1TB, Intel 660P 1TB, Corsair HX1000, Corsair 680x, Corsair H100i Platinum

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

all within margin of error because the games treat both cards as 2gb models since it cannot use the extra 2GB effectively since it needs to be able to access all of it at the same time.

But when there is so much data going through a small bus, you'll see the 4GB slowing down exponentially, so there isn't any point in getting the 4GB version. R9 series all have giant buses that can actually use all the VRAM

There are 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

well ive seen a 2gb stutter in skyrim with the same mods as me and my 4gb doesnt and with the mem clock being so high and the 4gigs its about the same as having a a 280x with 3 gigs so it really doesnt matter its worth it to alot of people id rather have a card thats not going to run out of memory anytime soon than one that is already a basic amount that WILL stutter in some cases. take this from someone who actually owns a 4gb 770.

PRIMARY NVIDIA PC

("I'm a Fanboy of Everything")
| CPU - i5-4670K @ 4.8ghz | CPU Cooler - Antec Kühler H2O 620 | GPU(S) - BIOS MODDED Twin GTX 770 4gb (Gigabyte)-master (Zotac)-slave @ 1337/2000 (8000 Effective) | Mobo - MSI Z87 GD65 Gaming | PSU - Corsair TX850M | Ram - 8gb Gskill RipjawsX @ 1866Mhz | Monitor - Samsung 27" 550 1080p 75Hz | Keyboard - Razer Black-Widow Ultimate 2013 | Storage - 2x 1TB WD-Blacks' | Mouse - AzzA Mouse Would Say "SQUEEKSQUEEK"|

SECONDARY RADEON PC

| CPU - A10-6800K @ 4.6ghz | CPU Cooler - CM Hyper EVO 212 | GPU(S) Twin Radeon 270x 2gb @ 1115/1500 (6000 Effective) | Mobo - MSI FM2-A85XA-G65 | PSU - Logisys 750W | Ram - 8gb @ 1600mhz | Moniter - Acer 24'' 1080p 60Hz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know ShadowPlay cannot capture your surround footage (to my knowledge)? You need to be playing at 1080p which is why I couldn't record when I was at 1600p. I need to test this though so don't quote me.

I wasn't planning on recording in surround anyways :P I know it can only handle 1920x1080.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

My epic paint skills, now if the bus is smaller the memory needs to be faster to cope with the Bus size bottle neck. Ignore the "but bus" spelling mistake. :')

attachicon.gifbusspeed.jpg

512 but bus? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://gyazo.com/5e239a101ce7cf09ba85d6db05e68bf2

That picture sums it up just about right.

:D

| CPU: i7 3770k | MOTHERBOARD: MSI Z77A-G45 Gaming | GPU: GTX 770 | RAM: 16GB G.Skill Trident X | PSU: XFX PRO 1050w | STORAGE: SSD 120GB PQI +  6TB HDD | COOLER: Thermaltake: Water 2.0 | CASE: Cooler Master: HAF 912 Plus |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Correct me if I'm wrong, more VRAM = less stutter.

Intel i5 6600k~Asus Maximus VIII Hero~G.Skill Ripjaws 4 Series 8GB DDR4-3200 CL-16~Sapphire Radeon R9 Fury Tri-X~Phanteks Enthoo Pro M~Sandisk Extreme Pro 480GB~SeaSonic Snow Silent 750~BenQ XL2730Z QHD 144Hz FreeSync~Cooler Master Seidon 240M~Varmilo VA87M (Cherry MX Brown)~Corsair Vengeance M95~Oppo PM-3~Windows 10 Pro~http://pcpartpicker.com/p/ynmBnQ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct me if I'm wrong, more VRAM = less stutter.

wrong look at the benchmarks for the GT 640 4gb, its garbage.

Specs: Cpu: i7-4790k@4.5ghz 1.19v Cooler: H100i Motherboard: Msi z97 g55 SLI  Ram: Kingston HyperX Black 16gb 1600mhz GPU: XFX R9 290X Core Edition PSU: Corsair HX850  Case: Fractal Design Define R4 Storage: Force series 3 120gb ssd, sandisk ultra 256gb ssd, 1tb blue drive  Keyboard: Rosewill RK9100x Mouse: DeathAdder  Monitors: 3 22 inch on a triple monitor mount

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those 4gb 760s and 270x's are for crossfire and sli where you are running at high resolutions like 1080p triple monitor setups  the idea that they can't some how can't access that much ram is bull shit the 128bit memory bus on my cpu can handle 32gb the wider memory buses on higher end cards is for increased bandwidth you also see large amounts of ram on professional cards like the K6000 that has 12gb. The only real difference between the memory controller on a cpu and a gpu is the use of ddr3 vs gddr5 512 bit memory bus is really 8 64bit controllers. If you were to say run 3 way 760 sli at 4k then the 4gb of ram would be a worthwhile investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

wrong look at the benchmarks for the GT 640 4gb, its garbage.

the gt 640 4gb is a stupid pointless card its benchmarks are garbage because its garbage your compairing 4gb of ddr3 on a low end crap card to a 760 with 4gb gddr5 which is pretty much intended for people who plan to run sli.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those 4gb 760s and 270x's are for crossfire and sli where you are running at high resolutions like 1080p triple monitor setups  the idea that they can't some how can't access that much ram is bull shit the 128bit memory bus on my cpu can handle 32gb the wider memory buses on higher end cards is for increased bandwidth you also see large amounts of ram on professional cards like the K6000 that has 12gb. The only real difference between the memory controller on a cpu and a gpu is the use of ddr3 vs gddr5 512 bit memory bus is really 8 64bit controllers. If you were to say run 3 way 760 sli at 4k then the 4gb of ram would be a worthwhile investment.

I respectfully disagree with most of the stuff you said. The bus is too small, so when you are gaming with 3 monitors, the FPS will drop because the bus would have so much data flowing through such a small area that it ruins gameplay.

 

I have no idea what you mean by 128 bit on a CPU, and handling 32gb......no idea what you are talking about there.

 

3 760sli at 4K, that's stupid. The cards cannot handle 4GB worth of textures, with only a 256 bit bus, thats silly.... That's like trying to get 500 people in a 250 person airplane

There are 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's like trying to get 500 people in a 250 person airplane

Well they could sit on each other's laps....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×