which one of these is more worth?

[Blackhole890]

also, the only difference between APU and FX series is on the integrated graphics card? Does FX cores work a lot better than APU cores?

[SLAYR]

4 minutes ago, Blackhole890 said:

also, the only difference between APU and FX series is on the integrated graphics card? Does FX cores work a lot better than APU cores?

The apu cores will do better since they are a new architecture. And the pentium is awful for gaming.

 

I would suggest a 860k/880k, and a rx 460.

[Kalevro]

If you're running win 10 then 8 gb ram is kind of a necessity.

[bughtoo]

get the g6600 that is better and its a beast OCer  you can get it for like 30$

[bughtoo]

Just now, Kalevro said:

If you're running win 10 then 8 gbof ram is kind of a necessity.

not really, how many current notebooks still have only 4 gb of ram? and they are all fine  

[SLAYR]

2 minutes ago, bughtoo said:

get the g6600 that is better and its a beast OCer  you can get it for like 30$

G6600? I think you mean q6600, and that is ancient, and a newer 880k will crush it, as well as decent 775 boards are expensive, and usually ddr2.

 

OP go for something like this.

http://pcpartpicker.com/list/ZMsY9W

 

[bughtoo]

1 minute ago, SLAYR said:

G6600? I think you mean q6600, and that is ancient, and a newer 880k will crush it, as well as decent 775 boards are expensive, and usually ddr2.

 

OP go for something like this.

http://pcpartpicker.com/list/ZMsY9W

 

right q6600 sorry. Yeah but budget is budget

[Blackhole890]

45 minutes ago, SLAYR said:

The apu cores will do better since they are a new architecture. And the pentium is awful for gaming.

 

I would suggest a 860k/880k, and a rx 460.

but that costs like 30-40€ more than g4400 or fx-6300... is really that worth getting that amd cpu?

[Quaker]

Your poll needs a 4th option - "None of the above"

 

But, if I had to choose, I'd probably go for the A10 since it has more, faster, newer cores than the FX-4300.

 

[Blackhole890]

2 hours ago, Quaker said:

Your poll needs a 4th option - "None of the above"

 

But, if I had to choose, I'd probably go for the A10 since it has more, faster, newer cores than the FX-4300.

 

then, any suggestion for 150-180€ budget on cpu+gpu?

[Quaker]

I don't know what's available to you, or euro prices.

I'd suggest going with the A10-7890K or some version of Athlon X4 (845/860/etc) plus an RX 460 depending upon budget.

Or, perhaps, an FX-6300/6350 + RX 460.

 

But not the FX-4300

[Blackhole890]

3 hours ago, Quaker said:

I don't know what's available to you, or euro prices.

I'd suggest going with the A10-7890K or some version of Athlon X4 (845/860/etc) plus an RX 460 depending upon budget.

Or, perhaps, an FX-6300/6350 + RX 460.

 

But not the FX-4300

why not the 4300? is only amd cpu which i can buy, the rest of them are too expensive for my budget

[Quaker]

The FX-4300 is a very bottom-end CPU. You'd find that you'd get rather poor fps in most games. Overall you'd be better off with the A10-7890K rather than the FX-4300 + RX 460. The RX 460 might be capable of better graphics than the A10, but the FX-4300 would be much poorer CPU-wise.

 

(The G4400 would also be better than the FX-4300)