Which phone is better ?

[turbopiki]

http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=7201&idPhone2=7068

[ZetZet]

M4 aqua is going to get 6.0 android. also snapdragon seems more reliable chip.

[turbopiki]

44 minutes ago, ZetZet said:

M4 aqua is going to get 6.0 android. also snapdragon seems more reliable chip.

what about Lenovo A7000 is it better than Sony ?

 

http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=7201&idPhone2=7068&idPhone3=7088

[ZetZet]

5 minutes ago, turbopiki said:

what about Lenovo A7000 is it better than Sony ?

 

http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=7201&idPhone2=7068&idPhone3=7088

mediatek has bad gpu performance generally. 

[BlueChinchillaEatingDorito]

M4 Aqua is waterproof. I don't think the Huawei is. 

 

[Mew]

2 hours ago, BlueChinchillaEatingDorito said:

M4 Aqua is waterproof. I don't think the Huawei is. 

 

Don't think of water resistance as a selling point but rather a marketing strategy. It's absolutely meaningless. 

[VerticalDiscussions]

On 23/05/2016 at 6:34 PM, ZetZet said:

-snip-

The Mali T880MP4 is weaker than the Mali T760MP8... i say thats pretty poor, considering the Helios X25 is an overclocked version of the X20 and its gpu is weaker than a 1 year old Exynos 7420, which still kicks a lot nowadays...

[ZetZet]

7 hours ago, VerticalDiscussions said:

The Mali T880MP4 is weaker than the Mali T760MP8... i say thats pretty poor, considering the Helios X25 is an overclocked version of the X20 and its gpu is weaker than a 1 year old Exynos 7420, which still kicks a lot nowadays...

yeah, mediatek doesn't focus on gpu performance, their main focus is cpu and battery life savings. 

[BlueChinchillaEatingDorito]

On 5/24/2016 at 1:18 AM, kurahk7 said:

Don't think of water resistance as a selling point but rather a marketing strategy. It's absolutely meaningless. 

Well I would argue. Considering how many iPhone users before the iPhone was water resistant, went to the Genius bar with water damaged devices. It's meaningless when you  are diligent and don't get your phone wet, but priceless when it saves your butter.

[Mew]

9 minutes ago, BlueChinchillaEatingDorito said:

Well I would argue. Considering how many iPhone users before the iPhone was water resistant, went to the Genius bar with water damaged devices. It's meaningless when you  are diligent and don't get your phone wet, but priceless when it saves your butter.

Water resistance doesn't mean your phone won't die from water nor does it mean the manufacturer will cover water damage. Because of that, it's completely worthless. 

[BlueChinchillaEatingDorito]

44 minutes ago, kurahk7 said:

Water resistance doesn't mean your phone won't die from water nor does it mean the manufacturer will cover water damage. Because of that, it's completely worthless. 

The likelihood of water damage it is lower provided that the water resistant features are not tampered with. That in itself is worth something to someone. Just because it's worth nothing to you, doesn't mean it isn't worth anything to someone else.

[Mew]

1 hour ago, BlueChinchillaEatingDorito said:

The likelihood of water damage it is lower provided that the water resistant features are not tampered with. That in itself is worth something to someone. Just because it's worth nothing to you, doesn't mean it isn't worth anything to someone else.

Yea, that's true. But my main point is that because the manufacturer doesn't stand behind their statement nor do they cover it under their warranty, it's risky subjecting your phone to water where it probably won't harm it, but it is still possible. So in the event that your phone does become water damaged, you won't be a happy customer. I've owned my water resistant phone for a little over 2 months now and I haven't even let it go near water and don't intend on doing so in the future; it's just not worth it.