Jump to content

I am thinking of making a server to run game servers on and I don't know whether to buy a Xeon E5-2603 v3 or a i5-6600K and overclocking it a bit. Which would be better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Overlandr said:

I am thinking of making a server to run game servers on and I don't know whether to buy a Xeon E5-2603 v3 or a i5-6600K and overclocking it a bit. Which would be better?

xeon.

xeons are made for calculations, ie server work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Bajantechnician said:

xeon.

xeons are made for calculations, ie server work.

Pretty much, plus you dont need the igpu of an i3/i5/i7 and depending on what xeon you go with you can use 2-4 later on. 

                     .
                   _/ V\
                  / /  /
                <<    |
                ,/    ]
              ,/      ]
            ,/        |
           /    \  \ /
          /      | | |
    ______|   __/_/| |
   /_______\______}\__}  

Spoiler

[i7-7700k@5Ghz | MSI Z270 M7 | 16GB 3000 GEIL EVOX | STRIX ROG 1060 OC 6G | EVGA G2 650W | ROSEWILL B2 SPIRIT | SANDISK 256GB M2 | 4x 1TB Seagate Barracudas RAID 10 ]

[i3-4360 | mini-itx potato | 4gb DDR3-1600 | 8tb wd red | 250gb seagate| Debian 9 ]

[Dell Inspiron 15 5567] 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Xeon if you want server grade CPU;

more cache, hyperthreading etc.

 

i5 if you want consumer grade stuff;

overclocking, integrated GPU etc.

 

Athlon X2 for only 27.31$   Best part lists at different price points   Windows 1.01 running natively on an Eee PC

My rig:

Spoiler

Celeronator (new main rig)

CPU: Intel Celeron (duh) N2840 2.16GHz Dual Core

RAM: 4GB DDR3 1333MHz

HDD: Seagate 500GB

GPU: Intel HD Graphics 3000 Series

Spoiler

Frankenhertz (ex main rig)

CPU: Intel Atom N2600 1.6GHz Dual Core

RAM: 1GB DDR3-800

HDD: HGST 320GB

GPU: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The price of the rest of the stuff (mobo etc) is quite a lot higher, do you think that is worth it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Overlandr said:

The price of the rest of the stuff (mobo etc) is quite a lot higher, do you think that is worth it?

yes, for what youre using it for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

What if I was running a minecraft server? Would it be alright to use a 128GB M.2?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jonnyswboy said:

No.

yes

1 hour ago, Overlandr said:

What if I was running a minecraft server? Would it be alright to use a 128GB M.2?

u dont need m.2

 

ok, so your making a minecraft server, how many people will be hittin git?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jonnyswboy said:

No.

Did you somehow quote me? I got the notification for it. 

 

We know they aren't running any special 'calculations' but they are meant for server work over the ix cpus. But thank you for such an insightful counter claim. 

3 minutes ago, Overlandr said:

What if I was running a minecraft server? Would it be alright to use a 128GB M.2?

m.2 is overkill and you may want more space.

 

23 minutes ago, Overlandr said:

The price of the rest of the stuff (mobo etc) is quite a lot higher, do you think that is worth it?

 Everything execpt the mobo and the cooler can be the same, and some boards can be as well

                     .
                   _/ V\
                  / /  /
                <<    |
                ,/    ]
              ,/      ]
            ,/        |
           /    \  \ /
          /      | | |
    ______|   __/_/| |
   /_______\______}\__}  

Spoiler

[i7-7700k@5Ghz | MSI Z270 M7 | 16GB 3000 GEIL EVOX | STRIX ROG 1060 OC 6G | EVGA G2 650W | ROSEWILL B2 SPIRIT | SANDISK 256GB M2 | 4x 1TB Seagate Barracudas RAID 10 ]

[i3-4360 | mini-itx potato | 4gb DDR3-1600 | 8tb wd red | 250gb seagate| Debian 9 ]

[Dell Inspiron 15 5567] 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bajantechnician said:

ok, so your making a minecraft server, how many people will be hittin git?

10 people max  and that would be rarely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

And wouldn't the M.2 make things load faster on the server? And would ECC memory be useful for the Minecraft server? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Overlandr said:

And wouldn't the M.2 make things load faster on the server? And would ECC memory be useful for the Minecraft server? 

the m.2 speeds over sata speeds would be unnoticeable after it goes through the network and the other pcs, an hdd would suit you just fine but if you insist on an ssd just use sata. 

ECC is error correcting, and is preferred but in your case theres no point since its a game server with low traffic and not some 100 person server or file server. 

                     .
                   _/ V\
                  / /  /
                <<    |
                ,/    ]
              ,/      ]
            ,/        |
           /    \  \ /
          /      | | |
    ______|   __/_/| |
   /_______\______}\__}  

Spoiler

[i7-7700k@5Ghz | MSI Z270 M7 | 16GB 3000 GEIL EVOX | STRIX ROG 1060 OC 6G | EVGA G2 650W | ROSEWILL B2 SPIRIT | SANDISK 256GB M2 | 4x 1TB Seagate Barracudas RAID 10 ]

[i3-4360 | mini-itx potato | 4gb DDR3-1600 | 8tb wd red | 250gb seagate| Debian 9 ]

[Dell Inspiron 15 5567] 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible, in the future, that I could add some extra ECC memory to the non-ECC memory? Or would I have to replace all of the memory?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also will cache in the storage make a difference the the performance of the server?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jonnyswboy said:

Xeons are made to have higher up times and constant load. They undergo more testing and support more things like ECC memory.

 

They aren't made for calculations. Every CPU ever made is "made for calculations".

"constant load"

 

lets agree to dissagree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jonnyswboy said:

It actually doesn't. 

 

And how old are you? I haven't heard someone say that since the fourth grade. 

15

surpried you still remeber anything from 4th grade. I personally dont

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jonnyswboy said:

Don't go on this forum and give people false information please.

its correct tought, right?

its for transcoding and for constant calculations where quantity is better than quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×