Is Amd fx 6300 and a gtx 960 good together

[Majestic]

4 minutes ago, Godlygamer23 said:

The usefulness of it is subjective at best, and not useful at all at worst.

How is emperical data subjective. Can I have whatever you are on?

 

Rest of the numbers; http://pclab.pl/art67995.html

[Godlygamer23]

5 minutes ago, Majestic said:

How is emperical data subjective. Can I have whatever you are on?

It's one benchmark. There is not enough data to come to a proper, unbiased conclusion.

[Majestic]

Just now, Godlygamer23 said:

It's one benchmark. There is not enough data to come to a proper, unbiased conclusion.

I'm still not seeing how that is subjective, there is nothing personal about it. It's an interpretation of factual evidence. 

I gave you the rest of the data.

 

If you're looking for outher outlets for similar data. Good luck. Most other outlets i've seen are either running GPU bottlenecked scenario's or are too afraid to not pander to their audience and omit such comparisson charts.

[Godlygamer23]

1 minute ago, Majestic said:

I'm still not seeing how that is subjective, there is nothing personal about it. It's an interpretation of factual evidence. 

I gave you the rest of the data.

Interpretations are subjective.

[Majestic]

5 minutes ago, Godlygamer23 said:

Interpretations are subjective.

Oh pleaseee godly... That's a stretch and you know it. You used a buzzword inappropriately and are now trying to rationalise it.

 

There is nothing subjective about showing two benchmarks, I wasn't even leading the reader. Only providing the caveat that the first benchmark was GPU bottlenecked and doesn't represent the relative performance difference between the CPU's in question.

 

But that it was probably going to be enough for the 960. Though the i3 would provide a more futureproof soluition. However foolish futureproofing as a concept is.

[Godlygamer23]

4 minutes ago, Majestic said:

Oh pleaseee godly... That's a stretch and you know it. You used a buzzword inappropriately and are now trying to rationalise it.

So interpretations don't fall under this category?

Quote

existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/subjective