Jump to content

R9 fury or fury x?

Werdna
By Werdna
in Graphics Cards
 Share
Posted

At 3440 x 1440p. Don't recommend me nvidia cards coz I have a freesync monitor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Fury X

Archangel (Desktop) CPU: i5 4590 GPU:Asus R9 280  3GB RAM:HyperX Beast 2x4GBPSU:SeaSonic S12G 750W Mobo:GA-H97m-HD3 Case:CM Silencio 650 Storage:1 TB WD Red
Celestial (Laptop 1) CPU:i7 4720HQ GPU:GTX 860M 4GB RAM:2x4GB SK Hynix DDR3Storage: 250GB 850 EVO Model:Lenovo Y50-70
Seraph (Laptop 2) CPU:i7 6700HQ GPU:GTX 970M 3GB RAM:2x8GB DDR4Storage: 256GB Samsung 951 + 1TB Toshiba HDD Model:Asus GL502VT
Windows 10 is now MSX! - http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/440190-can-we-start-calling-windows-10/page-6

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

well Fury X performs better but it also costs more

 

this is a matter of how much Money you want to spend.

 

Have you considered Dual Fury or Dual 390 for CrossFire?

CPU: Intel i7 5820K @ 4.20 GHz | Motherboard: MSI X99S SLI PLUS | RAM: Corsair LPX 16GB DDR4 @ 2666MHz | GPU: Sapphire R9 Fury (x2 CrossFire)
Storage: Samsung 950Pro 512GB // OCZ Vector150 240GB // Seagate 1TB | PSU: Seasonic 1050 Snow Silent | Case: NZXT H440 | Cooling: Nepton 240M
FireStrike // Extreme // Ultra // 8K // 16K

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

NANO > Fury

is it really? (genuinely curious)

Aftermarket 980Ti >= Fury X >= Reference 980Ti > Fury > 980 > 390X > 390 >= 970 > 380X > 380 >= 960 > 950 >= 370 > 750Ti = 360

"The Orange Box" || CPU: i5 4690k || RAM: Kingston Hyper X Fury 16GB || Case: Aerocool DS200 (Orange) || Cooler: Cryorig R1 Ultimate || Storage: Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB + WD Black 1TB || PSU: Corsair RM750 || Mobo: ASUS Z97-A || GPU: EVGA GTX 970 FTW+

"Unnamed Form Factor Switch" || CPU: i7 6700K || RAM: Kingston HyperX Fury 16GB || Case: Phanteks Enthoo Evolv Mini ITX (White) || Cooler: Cryorig R1 Ultimate (Green Cover) || Storage: Samsung 850 Evo 1TB || PSU: XFX XTR 550W || Mobo: ASUS Z170I Pro Gaming || GPU: EVGA GTX 970 FTW+

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

FuryX is faster. So you should buy this one. Damn, what a weird frase out of my "mouth".

CPU i7 6700k MB  MSI Z170A Pro Carbon GPU Zotac GTX980Ti amp!extreme RAM 16GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance 3k CASE Corsair 760T PSU Corsair RM750i MOUSE Logitech G9x KB Logitech G910 HS Sennheiser GSP 500 SC Asus Xonar 7.1 MONITOR Acer Predator xb270hu Storage 1x1TB + 2x500GB Samsung 7200U/m - 2x500GB SSD Samsung 850EVO

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Nano throttles.  At stock the Fury might edge it out.  Stop the throttling and the full sized chip on the Nano is better.

 

Fury X - $625

 

Fury - $500

 

Choice is your OP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Fury X > NANO > Fury > R9 390x > R9 290x > R9 390 > R9 290

 

 

is it really? (genuinely curious)

nope

Fury >= Nano

 

also

390>290x

 

watch some benchmarks

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

is it really? (genuinely curious)

not with the stock cooler

the nano is more like a 390x at half the power consumption

 

but if you manage to put the nano under water then it can come come inbetween Fury and Fury X

CPU: Intel i7 5820K @ 4.20 GHz | Motherboard: MSI X99S SLI PLUS | RAM: Corsair LPX 16GB DDR4 @ 2666MHz | GPU: Sapphire R9 Fury (x2 CrossFire)
Storage: Samsung 950Pro 512GB // OCZ Vector150 240GB // Seagate 1TB | PSU: Seasonic 1050 Snow Silent | Case: NZXT H440 | Cooling: Nepton 240M
FireStrike // Extreme // Ultra // 8K // 16K

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

nope

Fury >= Nano

 

also

390>290x

 

watch some benchmarks

The Nano is faster than the Fury on pen and paper, the cooler just lets it down.

The R9 290x is par or slightly faster than the R9 390, but people aren't rebenchmarking it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

The Nano is faster than the Fury on pen and paper, the cooler just lets it down.

The R9 290x is par or slightly faster than the R9 390, but people aren't rebenchmarking it.

yes, so what's more important? paper or practice?

there are benchmarks of 290x vs 390 on YT

and 390 is slightly ahead in majority of cases, but that was with Catalyst, Crimson might be different

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

I recommend the Fury Nitro though. Specifically the "nitro". Might not be the most value oriented suggestion but the Nitro's custom pcb made the Fury into what it should have been. 

i5 2400 | ASUS RTX 4090 TUF OC | Seasonic 1200W Prime Gold | WD Green 120gb | WD Blue 1tb | some ram | a random case

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

Get the nitro fury. It actually overclocks.

CPU i7 6700 Cooling Cryorig H7 Motherboard MSI H110i Pro AC RAM Kingston HyperX Fury 16GB DDR4 2133 GPU Pulse RX 5700 XT Case Fractal Design Define Mini C Storage Trascend SSD370S 256GB + WD Black 320GB + Sandisk Ultra II 480GB + WD Blue 1TB PSU EVGA GS 550 Display Nixeus Vue24B FreeSync 144 Hz Monitor (VESA mounted) Keyboard Aorus K3 Mechanical Keyboard Mouse Logitech G402 OS Windows 10 Home 64 bit

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing Graphics Cards

×