Jump to content

Title says it all. Does 16 gigs of ram help streaming at all instead of 8 gigs? Will everything run better or is it not worth it? I was thinking of ordering 8 more gigs of ram for my computer but im not sure if it will make a difference.

TBH, 8GB is more than enough for games + stream.

QUOTE ME IN A REPLY SO I CAN SEE THE NOTIFICATION!

When there is no danger of failure there is no pleasure in success.

Link to post
Share on other sites

how so?

 

More ram means better ability to multitask. While depending on the game, games like gta 5 and the witcher 3 are ram eaters. Combine that with streaming the game and it can get to that 8gb limit quite quick which will result in big stuttering

Longboarders/ skaters message me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

TBH, 8GB is more than enough for games + stream.

 

I manage to hit my 8GB limit playing a game. Streaming at the same time? Good luck.

My Gaming Rig;  Motherboard - ASUS Maximus VI Hero | CPU - Intel i5 4670k @4.5Ghz 1.25v | GPU - GIGABYTE GTX 980 @Stock | RAM -  16GB Corsair Vengeance @1866Mhz | CPU Cooler - Corsair H100i | Storage #1 - Samsung 840 Basic 250GB SSD | Storage #2 - Sandisk II 480GB SSD | Storage #3 - 2TB 7200rpm 64mb HDDPSU - Corsair HX750 | Case - Fractal Design R4 |

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another one on the intensive list is Fallout 4: I recently ran into many issues with memory because I migrated hard drives and forgot part of my page file was on the old hdd and I didn't set up a new one on my new hdd. But on my usual set up which is Torch (Chrome variant) playing youtube or twitch plus a game this was enough to sent some stuff to the page file which was tiny by default (to save up space on the ssd)

 

I am considering 16gb myself but I am not sure if I should get dual 8gb sticks and keep the mobo or get a new mobo and 2 more 4gb sticks. The cost is about the same but I'd end up with most needed parts for a spare rig so that's nice.

 

So games that can fill up my 8gb on my system with a browser open are:

 

-Modded Skyrim

-Fallout 4

-Witcher 3

-GTA V

-------

Current Rig

-------

Link to post
Share on other sites

TBH, 8GB is more than enough for games + stream.

Depends on the game tbh. More headroom is always nice imo.

 

With 16GB, i can keep like 20 - 30 Chrome tabs open, and livestream a game with ease.

Shot through the heart and you're to blame, 30fps and i'll pirate your game - Bon Jovi

Take me down to the console city where the games are blurry and the frames are thirty - Guns N' Roses

Arguing with religious people is like explaining to your mother that online games can't be paused...

Link to post
Share on other sites

It won't unless you end up going into page file

Intel 4670K /w TT water 2.0 performer, GTX 1070FE, Gigabyte Z87X-DH3, Corsair HX750, 16GB Mushkin 1333mhz, Fractal R4 Windowed, Varmilo mint TKL, Logitech m310, HP Pavilion 23bw, Logitech 2.1 Speakers

Link to post
Share on other sites

It won't unless you end up going into page file

 

And since you have at the bare minimum the game, OBS and a browser window open to keep an eye on things, this is actually likely on some games. 

-------

Current Rig

-------

Link to post
Share on other sites

I manage to hit my 8GB limit playing a game. Streaming at the same time? Good luck.

What the hell game takes 8GB RAM?

QUOTE ME IN A REPLY SO I CAN SEE THE NOTIFICATION!

When there is no danger of failure there is no pleasure in success.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What the hell game takes 8GB RAM?

 

 

So games that can fill up my 8gb on my system with a browser open are:

 

-Modded Skyrim

-Fallout 4

-Witcher 3

-GTA V

 

A browser open its very likely required while streaming unless you don't want to know if you go offline, drop frames, monitor your chat, etc.

-------

Current Rig

-------

Link to post
Share on other sites

A browser open its very likely required while streaming unless you don't want to know if you go offline, drop frames, monitor your chat, etc.

The Twitch player itself takes 15-20% of your CPU resources already, you really shouldn't be doing the monitoring on the same PC you do streams anyway unless you have 6 cores to spread the load.  4 cores?  Good luck.  i7 may help, but not much.

QUOTE ME IN A REPLY SO I CAN SEE THE NOTIFICATION!

When there is no danger of failure there is no pleasure in success.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What the hell game takes 8GB RAM?

 

Pretty much any game with a few programs in the background. 8GB is nothing and I regret not getting more.

My Gaming Rig;  Motherboard - ASUS Maximus VI Hero | CPU - Intel i5 4670k @4.5Ghz 1.25v | GPU - GIGABYTE GTX 980 @Stock | RAM -  16GB Corsair Vengeance @1866Mhz | CPU Cooler - Corsair H100i | Storage #1 - Samsung 840 Basic 250GB SSD | Storage #2 - Sandisk II 480GB SSD | Storage #3 - 2TB 7200rpm 64mb HDDPSU - Corsair HX750 | Case - Fractal Design R4 |

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Twitch player itself takes 15-20% of your CPU resources already, you really shouldn't be doing the monitoring on the same PC you do streams anyway unless you have 6 cores to spread the load.  4 cores?  Good luck.  i7 may help, but not much.

 

Partially conceded yes, but that's if you encode all on the CPU in another of his threads I suggested Shadwoplay or intel quick sync to take care of the encoding. Sure it looks worst but most non-partners on Twitch aren't allowed to stream at quality levels that take advantage of the better looking encoding anyway, and this way you're basically not taxing your CPU at all but your GPU (either one of them) which are a lot better at handling this extra work load. It works pretty great in fact I tried it myself: streaming with a 4440 no issues at all.

-------

Current Rig

-------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Partially conceded yes, but that's if you encode all on the CPU in another of his threads I suggested Shadwoplay or intel quick sync to take care of the encoding. Sure it looks worst but most non-partners on Twitch aren't allowed to stream at quality levels that take advantage of the better looking encoding anyway, and this way you're basically not taxing your CPU at all but your GPU (either one of them) which are a lot better at handling this extra work load. It works pretty great in fact I tried it myself: streaming with a 4440 no issues at all.

Non partners are still limited to the 3500kbps ingest upload.  At that bitrate, Shadowplay will look absolutely terrible IMHO and x264 would be the only way to go to reduce upload bandwidth/lower viewer bandwidth/have decent quality at lower bandwidth.

QUOTE ME IN A REPLY SO I CAN SEE THE NOTIFICATION!

When there is no danger of failure there is no pleasure in success.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×