Furyx vs 980Ti benchmarks by AMD

[Hunter7263]

Topic says it all.

 

https://techreport.com/news/28501/here-a-first-look-at-the-radeon-r9-fury-x-performance?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+techreport%2Fall+%28The+Tech+Report%29

 

This was apparently released by amd. The Fury X is winning every benchmark some by a little some by a lot. Its weird they left out GTA 5 though...

[salecar3]

Topic says it all.

 

https://techreport.com/news/28501/here-a-first-look-at-the-radeon-r9-fury-x-performance?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+techreport%2Fall+%28The+Tech+Report%29

 

This was apparently released by amd. The Fury X is winning every benchmark some by a little some by a lot. Its weird they left out GTA 5 though...

it lost in gta v by a long shot man gta v is nvidia game and tryed but unless they want ewain bigger photoshop to been senn its better that they just left it out and so we know its not as good at 980ti in that game

[Sauron]

Seen them. They look very impressive, if the air cooled fury performs like this the 980, 980ti and titan x completely stop making sense.

[PineappleHolidays]

repasta so many times I'm out of salt

But these are amd benches, so they could be comparing the fury alongside a 5820k aggainst a 980 ti with a i3 for all we know

[SkywardKkalox]

Think it's a retoast from yesterday.

[CoolaxGaming]

it lost in gta v by a long shot man gta v is nvidia game and tryed but unless they want ewain bigger photoshop to been senn its better that they just left it out and so we know its not as good at 980ti in that game

That never happened...

[BrandonTheCat]

I mean its such a small difference, why does it matter. Its not enough to make me go team red.

 

Choose what you want, I'll stick with Green team here

[Hunter7263]

I mean its such a small difference, why does it matter. Its not enough to make me go team red.

 

Choose what you want, I'll stick with Green team here

It matters because if these are stock speeds then its not just a little. The Fury is the same chip without the water cooler meaning 980ti beating performance for 100 bucks less

[VagabondWraith]

These are tests done by AMD. Wait for real people to benchmark. Unless you're a sucker and believe company speak.

[BrandonTheCat]

It matters because if these are stock speeds then its not just a little. The Fury is the same chip without the water cooler meaning 980ti beating performance for 100 bucks less

Sorry What? 

 

they are both $649. Keep in mind this is the Fury X and not the fury. And if this was me, the obvious choice would be the fury X

 

Still, Its not enough for me to move, I have to have a very, very substantial difference to even change.

 

Again, its the buyers decision. Im more of a INTELxNVIDIA Person.

 

^{"Intel, Nvidia, or AMD, We are all the same in gaben's eyes"} 

[BrandonTheCat]

These are tests done by AMD. Wait for real people to benchmark. Unless you're a sucker and believe company speak.

This^^^

[Hunter7263]

Sorry What? 

 

they are both $649. Keep in mind this is the Fury X and not the fury. And if this was me, the obvious choice would be the fury X

 

Still, Its not enough for me to move, I have to have a very, very substantial difference to even change.

 

Again, its the buyers decision. Im more of a INTELxNVIDIA Person.

 

^{"Intel, Nvidia, or AMD, We are all the same in gaben's eyes"} 

The Fury X and the Fury are the same gpu. The extra $100 comes from the water cooler. That's what they said at the e3 conference when they rolled out the cards. So unless they overclocked both of these to the max (and based on other benchmarks ive seen for the 980ti they haven't) then we can expect identical performance from the fury.

[BrandonTheCat]

The Fury X and the Fury are the same gpu. The extra $100 comes from the water cooler. That's what they said at the e3 conference when they rolled out the cards. So unless they overclocked both of these to the max (and based on other benchmarks ive seen for the 980ti they haven't) then we can expect identical performance from the fury.

I'm still going to wait for people's benchmarks. This is directly from AMD so anything could be altered.

[Chiobe]

The Fury X and the Fury are the same gpu. The extra $100 comes from the water cooler. That's what they said at the e3 conference when they rolled out the cards. So unless they overclocked both of these to the max (and based on other benchmarks ive seen for the 980ti they haven't) then we can expect identical performance from the fury.

It seems Fury is to Fury X, what the 980 ti is to the Titan X: http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-fury-official-gaming-benchmarks-fastest-singlegpu-graphics-card-world/

[whitedragon101]

Topic says it all.

 

https://techreport.com/news/28501/here-a-first-look-at-the-radeon-r9-fury-x-performance?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+techreport%2Fall+%28The+Tech+Report%29

 

This was apparently released by amd. The Fury X is winning every benchmark some by a little some by a lot. Its weird they left out GTA 5 though...

 

I would wait for independent benchmarks.  Some of the nVidia numbers quoted are so far off that sites posting these benchmarks have been adding notes to encourage caution in using these numbers to judge.

[Hunter7263]

It seems Fury is to Fury X, what the 980 ti is to the Titan X: http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-fury-official-gaming-benchmarks-fastest-singlegpu-graphics-card-world/

I remember from the conference that they said they are the same gpu but even so wcc contradicts itself in its own article. They said that AMD did not have specs yet on the air cooled Fury released yet but then listed specs for it. That's a pure guess. Maybe I heard it wrong while watching the e3 conference but even still if that is the case then we still have no idea what the Fury will have. To top that off its kind of hard to believe that there would be only a $100 gap between the cards if that were the case that they were different. That water cooling system isn't some generic system it was designed for the card which means custom water block and not just a gpu block like some kits you can buy. Even those kits at any decent quality run well over 100 bucks.

[Chiobe]

I remember from the conference that they said they are the same gpu but even so wcc contradicts itself in its own article. They said that AMD did not have specs yet on the air cooled Fury released yet but then listed specs for it. That's a pure guess. Maybe I heard it wrong while watching the e3 conference but even still if that is the case then we still have no idea what the Fury will have. To top that off its kind of hard to believe that there would be only a $100 gap between the cards if that were the case that they were different. That water cooling system isn't some generic system it was designed for the card which means custom water block and not just a gpu block like some kits you can buy. Even those kits at any decent quality run well over 100 bucks.

I dont think the water block is the only difference or they could have just sold those as an extra option, instead of making it a separate card.

[Nena Trinity]

Fury is a great card and I bet Nvidia will buy the rights to use HBM soon!