Black Ops 3 Trailer Rant

[via]

Fantastic! Another high budget AAA title that has the same exact story line as all the other ones in its genre. For Christs sake look at the description "Dark, gritty future where a new breed of Black Ops soldier emerges and the lines are blurred between our own humanity and the cutting-edge military robotics that define the future of combat." Il be damned if anyone could depict that as Black Ops 3 from any other modern day shooter. You can tell by that its just a re brand by looking at the trailer, there are clear aliasing flaws and un-smooth textures..? Render the whole thing in 3DSMax for all i care just give us something that we can actually look forward too. For Gods sake the trailer has 1/5 dislike ratio, open your god damn eyes treyarch and activison eventually nobodys goint to buy your games any more. There used to be a market for your games that included the appropriate demographic, 16-24, but now you are being passed down the the 12 year olds who just pissed them selves after seeing the trailer. Heres an idea: stop making games in the "near future" and find out what people really want in a game, because when Black Ops 69 comes out, you can bet your ass im not buying it if its another "near future" "technology is satan" "government propaganda" shit case.

 

[Imabigmac]

everyone else's thoughts

[jprig6]

The rehash of previous games is real.

[JorenBus]

Looks stupid af IMO.

They should have gone for a WWI or WWII game instead of that stupid futuristic bullshit.

[Remilia]

Spunkgargleweewee being spunkgargleweewee, nothing new.

As long as it sells and old men with no idea about videogames controls the money, don't expect there to be any big improvements soon.

Same goes for games like Assassins Creed, although Black Flag gave it a glimpse of hope and light before it got spanked and thrown back to the milking dungeon.

[fleshwoundf08x]

What do you expect! Its the same crappy game year after year with 10% changed for the people who think call of duty is a good game! But I havnt played the campaign for it since mw2 and havnt really played the multiplayer since b ops 2.

[Laurysss]

Well the first part.... dont expect a story from cod. NEVER. And I am not even mad. Everyone buys cod for mp.

[Kinda Bottlenecked]

Wouldn't you say the same for Witcher?

[Ridash]

They will change things when they see the sales are dropping a lot. 

[LegacyStijncat]

Want to play Black Ops III, but with better graphics, gameplay, and mechanized vehicles? AND CHEAPER?

Buy Titanfall.

It's same but probably better.

[Th3 Mans1ay3r]

This is what happens when you have 3 separate companies making CoD games.

[Sharkyx1]

This is what happens when you have 3 separate companies making CoD games.

Isn't that preferable? longer development time, more time to make each game 

 

 

Either way, Treyarch has always been solid in their COD games, and this one looks to change the formula even more than BO II did with its branching choices

[Th3 Mans1ay3r]

Isn't that preferable? longer development time, more time to make each game 

 

 

Either way, Treyarch has always been solid in their COD games, and this one looks to change the formula even more than BO II did with its branching choices

It's not really preferable. CoD started to go downhill after the developer split and it makes you just get a CoD each year that are all mass produced. It also means that each CoD feels like repetition and allows the devs to be lazy.

[Sharkyx1]

It's not really preferable. CoD started to go downhill after the developer split and it makes you just get a CoD each year that are all mass produced. It also means that each CoD feels like repetition and allows the devs to be lazy.

Are you talking about the IW split after MW? 

[Vvardenfell]

This seems relevant again: