Jump to content

What to look for in a GPU

Felix0411

Hello

 

I've been looking around for some budget parts (specifically GPUs) and I was wondering "What should I be looking for?". For example, many of the cards display different frequencies and I'm not sure how large of a difference the memory interface would make at 64-bit or 128-bit. I'm sure this question has been asked in different forms, but I really would like to know (as you can tell, I really am a newbie).

 

Here is an example of what I mean:

 

AMD Radeon R7 240 - 730 MHz* GPU - 4 GB GDDR3** @ 1.80 GHz (128-bit)*** - DVI-D / HDMI / VGA

 

* First frequency I believe is the core clock speed?

 

** GDDR3 or GDDR5?

 

*** Second frequency? Different memory interfaces?

 

This is probably quite obvious to many, sorry.

 

Thanks

"The FPS I got was this big!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I don't intend to get it anyway. I just happened to have a list of GPU's available, and I'm aware of what Linus has to say about the R7 240.

 

Thanks though

"The FPS I got was this big!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The biggest bottleneck on the low level chips is, apart from the chip, the memory. Most of the time, you can get an entry level gpu with less gddr5 or more ddr3. Always go for the gddr5 model. It is significantly faster than the ddr3 model, even if they give you 4gb of ddr3. 

Molex to SATA, lose all your data

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

frquency really doesnt matter much because you can overclock very easily to push it beyond that

 

look for GDDR5

Rigs I've Built

The Striker i5 4590 @ 3.7 ||  MSI GTX 980 Armor X2 || Corsair RMX 750 || Team Elite Plus 8 GB || Define S || MSI Z97S SLI Krait

The Office PC i3 4160 @ 3.6 || Intel 4600 || EVGA 500B || G.Skill 8 GB || Cooler Master N200 || ASRock H97M Pro4

The Friend PC G3258 @ 4.3 || Sapphire R9 280X Tri-X || EVGA 600B || 8 GB Dell Ram || Cooler Master N200 || ASRock H97M- iTX/ac

The Mom Gaming PC A10-7890K @ 4.4 || iGPU + ASUS R7 250 ||  8 GB Klevv DDR3-2800 Mhz

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I look for:

Nice body. If they don't look good, it'll be awkward during play time and when you're showing off to friends.

Has to be able to keep up with my activities. If not, we're not gonna work out.

Has to understand that I have needs.

Needs to be able to work harder than me since my activities are very demanding.

List goes on..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The biggest bottleneck on the low level chips is, apart from the chip, the memory. Most of the time, you can get an entry level gpu with less gddr5 or more ddr3. Always go for the gddr5 model. It is significantly faster than the ddr3 model, even if they give you 4gb of ddr3. 

 

Okay, that's good to know. Any idea on the two different frequencies? Is it memory and core clock speed?

"The FPS I got was this big!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I posted that comment and then two other comments appeared..

"The FPS I got was this big!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what I look for:

Nice body. If they don't look good, it'll be awkward during play time and when you're showing off to friends.

Has to be able to keep up with my activities. If not, we're not gonna work out.

Has to understand that I have needs.

Needs to be able to work harder than me since my activities are very demanding.

List goes on..

 

Well I am glad you dont have a 970.

 

I hear that card has trouble keeping up with demanding activities after 3.5 minutes.

 

The performance starts going down prematurely.

 

 

I can Make jokes too Q_Q

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

AMD Radeon R7 250 - 1000/1050 MHz GPU - 1 GB GDDR5 @ 4.60 GHz (128-bit) - DVI / HDMI / VGA

 

Would you say this is a decent GPU for 99 USD?

"The FPS I got was this big!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget specs and numbers. when it comes to buying any pc product buy the best you can afford.

numbers mean very little these days, remember how 5 years ago processors were all about ghz! now it's all about cores amd architecture. a poorly made chip running high clock speeds can still perform worse than a chip that's better coded for and runs cooler at a lower speed.

so state a budget and then find whatever cards fit. once you've got a few find the best one by its name.

E.g a 240 is weaker than a 250 or a gt 940 is worse than a 950 ect ect (not sure of the 940 is a card I was just giving examples)

amd cards tend to give the best value for money where as nvidia are more refined, less noisy and more energy efficient.

either brand you can't go wrong.

Gaming PC: • AMD Ryzen 7 3900x • 16gb Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 3200mhz • Founders Edition 2080ti • 2x Crucial 1tb nvme ssd • NZXT H1• Logitech G915TKL • Logitech G Pro • Asus ROG XG32VQ • SteelSeries Arctis Pro Wireless

Laptop: MacBook Pro M1 512gb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

AMD Radeon R7 250 - 1000/1050 MHz GPU - 1 GB GDDR5 @ 4.60 GHz (128-bit) - DVI / HDMI / VGA

 

Would you say this is a decent GPU for 99 USD?

NO

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

Video Card: Sapphire Radeon R7 260X 2GB Video Card  ($104.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Total: $104.99

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available

Generated by PCPartPicker 2015-03-02 09:05 EST-0500

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget specs and numbers. when it comes to buying any pc product buy the best you can afford.

numbers mean very little these days, remember how 5 years ago processors were all about ghz! now it's all about cores amd architecture. a poorly made chip running high clock speeds can still perform worse than a chip that's better coded for and runs cooler at a lower speed.

so state a budget and then find whatever cards fit. once you've got a few find the best one by its name.

E.g a 240 is weaker than a 250 or a gt 940 is worse than a 950 ect ect (not sure of the 940 is a card I was just giving examples)

amd cards tend to give the best value for money where as nvidia are more refined, less noisy and more energy efficient.

either brand you can't go wrong.

 

 

I have a budget, and that's why my choice is quite limited. Also, I understand that specs don't make up 100% of the story, but it is the easiest way to describe my predicament. 

 

But thank you

"The FPS I got was this big!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO

 

PCPartPicker part list / Price breakdown by merchant

Video Card: Sapphire Radeon R7 260X 2GB Video Card  ($104.99 @ SuperBiiz)

Total: $104.99

Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available

Generated by PCPartPicker 2015-03-02 09:05 EST-0500

 

Why not, exactly? Am I missing something?

"The FPS I got was this big!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm... that GPU is pretty powerful. I just don't have the budget.

"The FPS I got was this big!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

snip

Don't get an R7 240. It offers horrible price/performance. At minimum go for an R7 250. A good rule of thumb is that if it's below $100 MSRP then it's probably not worth it for new graphics cards. Buy a used mid range or high end card on ebay if you want maximum price/performance. Ebay protects the buyer very well, if the card doesn't work you should be able to easily get a refund. For example, I've found multiple R9 280X's (7970's) auctioning for about $80. That would definitely be the best if you're looking for low prices and great performance.

 

Edit: read the above post. Look at used 78xx cards from AMD. Those should be even lower priced than what I mentioned.

CPU: AMD FX-6300 4GHz @ 1.3 volts | CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO | RAM: 8GB DDR3

Motherboard: Gigabyte 970A-DS3P | GPU: EVGA GTX 960 SSC | SSD: 250GB Samsung 850 EVO

HDD: 1TB WD Caviar Green | Case: Fractal Design Core 2500 | OS: Windows 10 Home

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because the 260x costs the same and is MUCH faster.

Dont look at the specs , go look at benchmarks Q_Q

 

Fair enough, I have an APU though, so perhaps a slightly slower card would benefit from the built-in graphics?

"The FPS I got was this big!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough, I have an APU though, so perhaps a slightly slower card would benefit from the built-in graphics?

Dual graphics doesn't work very well

CPU: AMD FX-6300 4GHz @ 1.3 volts | CPU Cooler: Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO | RAM: 8GB DDR3

Motherboard: Gigabyte 970A-DS3P | GPU: EVGA GTX 960 SSC | SSD: 250GB Samsung 850 EVO

HDD: 1TB WD Caviar Green | Case: Fractal Design Core 2500 | OS: Windows 10 Home

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it reduce performance or simply doesn't benefit?

"The FPS I got was this big!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×