True?

[I/O]

Yes, its a GTX 780, yes it has been clocked quite high compared to a stock 780. Its an amazing card that outperforms the AMD's, not as good price / performance but more FPS than R9 290 that makes me happy.

High clocked R9 290 high clocked 780 apples to apples.

[SlaughterSmurf]

High clocked R9 290 high clocked 780 apples to apples.

You are relentless. 780 is more reliable, performs the same when both are overclocked to the max, consumes less power and subjectively has a better feature set. The 290 costs less and consumes more power, subjectively inferior feature set, performs the same when both are overclocked and has a higher failure rate according to this http://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Video-Card-Failure-Rates-by-Generation-563/

Both cards have a place on the market. Let's just agree that different solutions work better for different people.

[I/O]

You are relentless. 780 is more reliable,

Prove it LOL.

[SHiFT]

You are relentless. 780 is more reliable, performs the same when both are overclocked to the max, consumes less power and subjectively has a better feature set. The 290 costs less and consumes more power, subjectively inferior feature set, performs the same when both are overclocked and has a higher failure rate according to this http://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Video-Card-Failure-Rates-by-Generation-563/

Both cards have a place on the market. Let's just agree that different solutions work better for different people.

You will start him too, thats why I stopped replying.

[SlaughterSmurf]

Prove it LOL.

http://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Video-Card-Failure-Rates-by-Generation-563/

read the whole post you arrogant fool, don't read the first line and comment.

[SHiFT]

http://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Video-Card-Failure-Rates-by-Generation-563/

read the whole post you arrogant fool, don't read the first line and comment.

Thanks for that graph, now I am defo convinced.

[SlaughterSmurf]

You will start him too, thats why I stopped replying.

I have argued this with him every week for like a month and a half. I always prove him wrong and he shuts up lol. Nothing is more satisfying than beating an ignorant fool who is dead set on proving me wrong when facts are in my favour

[I/O]

What are you trying to say guy's ? ... an OCed 780 is faster than a reference 780 ?

[SHiFT]

I have argued this with him every week for like a month and a half. I always prove him wrong and he shuts up lol. Nothing is more satisfying than beating an ignorant fool who is dead set on proving me wrong when facts are in my favour

I proved my point right, he was arguing with me and said that he talked about something completely difference.. lol. Keep it up mate.

[I/O]

I proved my point right, he was arguing with me and said that he talked about something completely difference.. lol. Keep it up mate.

talked about what ... are you trying to argue ? ..... what are you trying to argue whatt .... argue you are what ?

[SHiFT]

What are you trying to say guy's ? ... an OCed 780 is faster than a reference 780 ?

He said 780 is more reliable. You said Prove it LOL. He gave you a graph showing 780 series are 10~11% more reliable than AMD R9 series. Point PROVEN. Go to sleep kid. You have no clue.

[I/O]

He said 780 is more reliable. You said Prove it LOL. He gave you a graph showing 780 series are 10~11% more reliable than AMD R9 series. Point PROVEN. Go to sleep kid. You have no clue.

Puget LOL hardly a reliable source.

[SlaughterSmurf]

What are you trying to say guy's ? ... an OCed 780 is faster than a reference 780 ?

Performance - 780 = 290

Price - 780 < 290

Features - Subjective, for me 780 > 290

Reliability - 780>290

Power Usage - 780>290

Heat Output - 780 > 290

 

I don't know understand what is so hard to understand....

[SlaughterSmurf]

Puget LOL hardly a reliable source.

Can you find another source?