5060 perf? tpu?

[hollyh88]

what do people think. did they make an oopsy? cause as far as i know we arent supposed to know its actual performance yet.

[MiszS]

Probably just predicting based on the specs

[Tetras]

Pretty sure they wouldn't use actual (review) data for this, 'cos that might jeopardise receiving samples.

[Eigenvektor]

Your screenshot conveniently left out the red box at the top that says

Quote

This product is not released yet.

Data on this page may change in the future.

In other words it is based on speculation. The description below also uses words like "will be" and "expected".

 

13 minutes ago, Tetras said:

Pretty sure they wouldn't use actual (review) data for this, 'cos that might jeopardise receiving samples.

Assuming Nvidia doesn't pull another 5060 Ti 8 GB and "hides" it from reviewers.

[hollyh88]

1 hour ago, MiszS said:

Probably just predicting based on the specs

they usually dont have this as far as i know, usually it simply says specs. not the actual performance data comparitive to other gpus. that is something they only do for as far as i can remember, if they actually have a model they tested and thus are able to place in the position it should be in.

 

 

1 hour ago, Eigenvektor said:

Your screenshot conveniently left out the red box at the top that says

In other words it is based on speculation. The description below also uses words like "will be" and "expected".

^ what i said above,

I didnt mean to leave it out, it simply says that it hasnt been released yet and that the specs can change, that has always been said on these spec sheets on unreleased cards. However, they have never actually showed the chart as they dont speculate where it belongs on the chart. they only ever include the chart on the page when they know where it will be. 

i never have seen a gpu that has yet to release get an listing in the charts.\

 

also, if you look at the official charts which nvidia did show,

 

and then only at the  "raster" of delta force,
https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/nvidias-rtx-5060-gpus-are-launching-soon-with-price-cuts-on-the-rtx-5060-ti

it comes at about 140-145 fps. as the video below shows as wel at 1080p ultra with dlss q

now on nvidias charts you can kinda point it to be around the 160 mark,
that would indeed be roughly a 10-14% difference in perf. the tpu chart shows it at 2% higher than a 6700xt, or from a 4060 standpoint, then 14% faster than it. cause according to tpu the difference between a 6700xt and a 4060 is 12%.

and if you click on the 4060 it doesnt show the 5060. this is how it should be as the 5060 shouldnt show up on the chart unless they actually have perf they can compare it against

 

[hollyh88]

1 hour ago, Tetras said:

Pretty sure they wouldn't use actual (review) data for this, 'cos that might jeopardise receiving samples.

they only ever show perf data of reviews then match the average, its what they base their whole performance chart on. 

[starsmine]

14 minutes ago, hollyh88 said:

they usually dont have this as far as i know, usually it simply says specs. not the actual performance data comparitive to other gpus. that is something they only do for as far as i can remember, if they actually have a model they tested and thus are able to place in the position it should be in.

They almost always do once specs are 90% confident

[Tetras]

5 minutes ago, hollyh88 said:

they only ever show perf data of reviews then match the average, its what they base their whole performance chart on. 

For a pre-release? I think not. Would break NDA and be copied all over the Internet.

[hollyh88]

18 minutes ago, Tetras said:

For a pre-release? I think not. Would break NDA and be copied all over the Internet.

which is why they may have done an oopsie.
this can happen.
 

23 minutes ago, starsmine said:

They almost always do once specs are 90% confident

ive never seen this before, they also seem to have it for the 9060xt now. it didnt some days ago. now its listed as 6% faster than the 5060ti. it could simply be new, but i never saw this before with previous gens i looked at and followed. 

[Tetras]

Just now, hollyh88 said:

which is why they may have done an oopsie.

It is possible, but I doubt it, they have had a lot of unreleased/unreviewed cards in the database.

[WereCat]

2 hours ago, Tetras said:

Pretty sure they wouldn't use actual (review) data for this, 'cos that might jeopardise receiving samples.

NVIDIA wont be sampling any 5060 for reviews though.

[jaslion]

2 hours ago, Eigenvektor said:

Your screenshot conveniently left out the red box at the top that says

They've basically never done this. So I do believe there's thruth behind it. May just be another fuck you to nvidia.

[hollyh88]

8 minutes ago, jaslion said:

They've basically never done this. So I do believe there's thruth behind it. May just be another fuck you to nvidia.

glad to see im not crazy, im pretty sure they never done this, the 9060xt also already has perf data. its weird. 

 

especially since i wouldnt expect it to be near the 4070 with its figures. since its supposed to have 42% fewer su's than the 9070. while this chart suggests its 37% slower than the 9070.
 

[MiszS]

The 5060ti 16GB is slower than the 3080, which is almost the same as 4070, no chance 5060 will be close

[Tetras]

1 hour ago, hollyh88 said:

glad to see im not crazy, im pretty sure they never done this, the 9060xt also already has perf data. its weird. 

I use the database almost every day and I can promise you they do it all the time 

 

Pretty much as soon as a card is announced (or even just rumoured) and some idea of the specs is available, it goes in the database.

 

You can already find the 5050, for example.

[jaslion]

3 hours ago, Tetras said:

I use the database almost every day and I can promise you they do it all the time 

 

Pretty much as soon as a card is announced (or even just rumoured) and some idea of the specs is available, it goes in the database.

 

You can already find the 5050, for example.

I know they do the adding to database but haven't seen them do relative perf before. Also no warning at the 5050 :P.

[hollyh88]

12 hours ago, Tetras said:

I use the database almost every day and I can promise you they do it all the time 

 

Pretty much as soon as a card is announced (or even just rumoured) and some idea of the specs is available, it goes in the database.

 

You can already find the 5050, for example.

i to use it quite often, several times a week. which is why its weird i never saw it, and only can remember them listing specs but not perf data estimates before. its not something bs like many calculators out there. but yeah as jaslion says, they didnt put a speculation at the 5050. but they also dont even have a page up for the 9070 gre even though we know specs. also the 5050 says "launched in 2025" not "expected to launch". like with 9060xt that says "that is expected to launch in the future" or 5060's "expected to launch in may"

 

either they are simply messing a lot of stuff up or it truly is a mistake. 

[starsmine]

6 hours ago, hollyh88 said:

i to use it quite often, several times a week. which is why its weird i never saw it, and only can remember them listing specs but not perf data estimates before. its not something bs like many calculators out there. but yeah as jaslion says, they didnt put a speculation at the 5050. but they also dont even have a page up for the 9070 gre even though we know specs. also the 5050 says "launched in 2025" not "expected to launch". like with 9060xt that says "that is expected to launch in the future" or 5060's "expected to launch in may"

 

either they are simply messing a lot of stuff up or it truly is a mistake. 

Again, for unreleased cards where they are 90%+ confident of the specs and have a trend based on the architecture, they do this. 

It does not show up on any page but the page for the card that is being speculated about to not get people bad data when looking at cards that are already out. 

Nothing is messed up, there was no mistake.

We have 5 Blackwell cards out already and we know the 5060 specs 100%, making an estimate +-10% is trivial.