Jump to content

i3 12th/13th/14th Gen

What are the differences between i3 12th/13th/14th Gen? Is there a performance gain of 14th over 13th over 12th worth the extra cost?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14100f is only a couple percent faster than 13100f, and 13100f is only a couple percent faster than 12100f. So it's not much im pretty sure.
Just get a 14100f cause I think it only barely costs more than a 13100f right now.

Edit: I think you get much better value if you go for an i5 12400f (or 13th/14th gen equivalent)

PC Specifications: Intel i9-14900KF, 5.9GHz all core locked, 5GHz ring, 1.45v Medium LLC, E-cores and HT disabled | MSI RTX 4090 Gaming X Trio | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360 + Thermal Grizzly contact frame | 2x16 G.Skill Trident Z5 7400MHz 34-44-44-34 1T 1.45v (Tuned Subtimings, Hynix A-Die) | Gigabyte Z790 AORUS Elite AX | Windows 10/11 EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 T2 Phanteks P400A (Black non-rgb version, Phanteks T30 fans 3 intake (On AIO), 1 exhaust) | SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB PCIE 4.0 (Boot drive), Samsung 870 EVO 2TB SATA

 

Displays: MSI MAG 271QPX 1440p 360Hz 27" QD-OLED | LG UltraGear 27GP950-B, 4K 144Hz (@120hz) 27" IPS

 

Desktop Audio: STAX SR-007 MK2 Electrostatic Headphones | STAX SRM-400S Amp | Schiit Bifrost 2/64 (NOS mode, USB in, XLR out)

 

Mobile Audio: Sennheiser IE 900 IEMs using included 4.4mm cable | FiiO KA13 "Desktop mode" Disabled

 

Peripherals: Razer Huntsman V2 Full size wired with linear optical switch | Logitech G502 Hero

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're pretty much just the same chips but each have slightly higher clock speeds and power budgets than the other. And support for more memory, I think 192gb of 14th and 13th gen vs 128gb on 12th gen or something like that. Cheapest might be best, but if it's not that much extra it might be worth considering one of the newer chips. There's a 200mhz difference between gens for boost clocks and 100mhz for base clocks, so 14th gen is 200mhz higher boost and 100mhz higher than 13th gen and same applies for 13th and 12th gen.

 

Personally I don't thin any of the i3 chips are really worth it, I'd just pick up the 12400f, 20$ extra for 2 extra cores is a pretty good deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im running on a 12100f, and it is very good. it is 30 buck cheaper than the 14100f and there really isn't much of a difference. I would personally just get a 12100f and spend the 30 bucks on upgrading something else. you also got a clear upgrade path. i'm running on a 3070 with little to no bottleneck.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

12100F to 14100F is up to 400 MHz more turbo. What is the use case? I got a 12100F very recently as the cheapest recent era CPU, which will become a new file server so I don't need massive CPU.

 

59 minutes ago, rippy4500 said:

Edit: I think you get much better value if you go for an i5 12400f (or 13th/14th gen equivalent)

For general use, 6 cores would be a better general experience for sure.

 

34 minutes ago, AndreiArgeanu said:

Personally I don't thin any of the i3 chips are really worth it, I'd just pick up the 12400f, 20$ extra for 2 extra cores is a pretty good deal

Are they that close where you are? Where I am in UK, the 12400F is 42% more than the 12100F.

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, RTX 4070, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, random 1080p + 720p displays.
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, porina said:

Are they that close where you are? Where I am in UK, the 12400F is 42% more than the 12100F.

I'm asumming US pricing. And I was comparing it to the 13100F and 14100F which have similar pricing to each other. I think it's about 40$ when compared to the 12100F.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AndreiArgeanu said:

And I was comparing it to the 13100F and 14100F which have similar pricing to each other. I think it's about 40$ when compared to the 12100F.

I missed that nuance. Yes, 12400F makes more sense than a 14100F due to the narrow pricing difference. I think the bigger drop to 12100F might still have some value depending on use case.

Gaming system: R7 7800X3D, Asus ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming Wifi, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE ARGB, Corsair Vengeance 2x 32GB 6000C30, RTX 4070, MSI MPG A850G, Fractal Design North, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Acer Predator XB241YU 24" 1440p 144Hz G-Sync + HP LP2475w 24" 1200p 60Hz wide gamut
Productivity system: i9-7980XE, Asus X299 TUF mark 2, Noctua D15, 64GB ram (mixed), RTX 3070, NZXT E850, GameMax Abyss, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB, random 1080p + 720p displays.
Gaming laptop: Lenovo Legion 5, 5800H, RTX 3070, Kingston DDR4 3200C22 2x16GB 2Rx8, Kingston Fury Renegade 1TB + Crucial P1 1TB SSD, 165 Hz IPS 1080p G-Sync Compatible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×