Jump to content

Ive always heard that newer architectures give better performance. So heres my question. The fx-4130 runs at 3.8GHz with 4 cores and gives off considerable heat and uses quite a bit of power. Will an A10-5800k, which has the same amount of cores and running at the same clock speed, perform better or worse? I believe it uses a little less power, but what would the heat output be, considering it has gpu cores as well? In terms of pure cpu performance which would perform better?

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/144316-different-architecture-question/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

The architecture determines the cpi among other things. And you need to know both the cpi and clock speed to determine the overall performance, so its hard to say

Rig: AMD FX 8350, Asus Sabertooth 990fx, 16gb Corsair Vengence, Gigabyte R9 290 4GB, Noctua NH-12S, Samsung 840 Evo, WD 1TB Black, Corsair C70, Monitors: Samsung Syncmaster SA350, Acer 193w, Mouse: Cyborg RAT 5. Window 7 Pro

Laptop: Asus x75vd, Intel i5 3210M, 8gb RAM, Nvidia 610m 1gb, 750gb hdd

PS2, PS3, PS4, PS Vita, Xbox360

Link to post
Share on other sites

Despite the FX 4130s name it's actually based on Piledriver not Bulldozer so it features the same architecture as the 5800K but has an additional 4mb of L3 cache.
http://www.techpowerup.com/179558/amd-releases-fx-4130-vishera-quad-core-processor.html
It overclocks slightly better & due to the L3 cache is ever so slightly faster.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heatwise about the same, unless integrated video is disabled the A10 probably wins as it doesn't have 384 VLIW4 cores pumping out heat then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the architecture defines the tech implemented in the CPU/GPU and features it happens to support  ,the way it handles and consumes power , the way it connects it's CORES and layouts to other Computer parts and DRIVERS ,APIs ,apps ,the newer the architecture is the more efficient it becomes ,is the commune change that newer architecture does ,take Fermi for ex ,it consumed doble the amount of power current Kepler does ,and still it didn't handle it as efficient as Kepler

 Crust : Intel Core i5 4690K @ 4.4Ghz 1.45v  |  MotherboardMSI Z97 MPower  |  Fruity FillingMSI GTX 960 Armor 2Way-SLI |  CoolingNoctua NH-D15  |  RAM : 16GB Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz | Storage : 2xSamsung 840 EVO 500GB SSDs Raid-0  |  Power Supply : Seasonic X-Series 1250W 80+Gold  |  Monitor : Dell U2713HM 27" 60Hz 1440p  |                                                                                                                                           

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×