I got bored, so I took photos

[Ruostunut kokis]

You know, you can scale the pictures down to like 800x600 (they still maintain the sharpness, just get smaller in size (also helluvalot smaller in terms of file size). Not all people have fast and/or unlimited cap internet (not saying I have problems, but some people, for example mobile users have to wait a looong time to load the pics). I personally scale down every picture I take to get the file size smaller.

 

Nice pics btw.

[DoubleY]

You know, you can scale the pictures down to like 800x600 (they still maintain the sharpness, just get smaller in size (also helluvalot smaller in terms of file size). Not all people have fast and/or unlimited cap internet (not saying I have problems, but some people, for example mobile users have to wait a looong time to load the pics). I personally scale down every picture I take to get the file size smaller.

 

Nice pics btw.

I did know that. 

 

If I were to actually put these on a website (like, A LOT of them) I would scale them down.

[StormtrooperStu]

I like them. A bit too heavy on the DOF for my personal tastes but they look good.

 

NEVER........

[DoubleY]

NEVER........

I am assuming that you also like DoF?

[Ruostunut kokis]

I am assuming that you also like DoF?

There has to be some DoF-whores out there... :lol:

[Xquisite]

Nice photos.

Alas, at the moment I know nothing about cameras and DSLRs in particular.

But still awesome photos

[StormtrooperStu]

I am assuming that you also like DoF?

 

Bokeh bitch baby. 

[DoubleY]

I took these a few days ago when at my uncles house 

 

Here is the original Imgur Album: http://imgur.com/a/zWXgT

Here are the RAW files (in JPEG format, so not completely RAW ) : http://www.mediafire.com/download/7czzicx9p67kmf6/Dog_Pictures.rar

 

And here they are embedded: 

 

I know that the last two are dark. It was a mixture of bad lightning (later at night than the others) and higher shutter speed. 

[Ruostunut kokis]

I took these a few days ago when at my uncles house 

 

Here is the original Imgur Album: http://imgur.com/a/zWXgT

Here are the RAW files (in JPEG format, so not completely RAW ) : http://www.mediafire.com/download/7czzicx9p67kmf6/Dog_Pictures.rar

 

And here they are embedded: 

[snip]

[snip]

[schneep]

[snip]

[snip]

 

I know that the last two are dark. It was a mixture of bad lightning (later at night than the others) and higher shutter speed. 

IMO the second last pic in a way looks great even though it looks dark.

[DoubleY]

IMO the second last pic in a way looks great even though it looks dark.

I wish it had turned out brighter  

[Blade of Grass]

Im no photographer but isnt DOF based highly on the aperture rating of the lens?

Well, partially.

DoF also is based off the focal length (zoom vs wide), the distance at which you're focused at (how far from the lens to subject) and the distance from them to the background.

It kinda cool how it works, wide angle lenses have deep DoFs whereas telephoto lenses have a shallower DoF (along with compression which adds to shallow DoF).

Now a cool thing you can do, is get a wider lens, go really up close to something, and make sure there's alot of distance to the background, then take your photo. You'll notice that it actually has a shallow ish DoF. Then retake the photo with a Tele and you can see the difference. (this is assuming you're shooting wide opend)

[Snake]

I like them. A bit too heavy on the DOF for my personal tastes but they look good.

Im guessing you mean bokeh ?

Also nice photos

[TechFanboy]

If people who like audio are audiophiles then what do you call someone who likes photography?

Photomaniac i guess? haha