Jump to content

WARNING: New Google Drive app steals a drive letter

h00ter

I did a quick search and didn't find anyone else talking about it so here I am.

Warning: The new Google Drive Desktop App now takes your designated Google Drive folder and mounts it as a device in your "This PC." By doing so it steals a drive letter (precious for those of us running multiple drives), and does not let you remove it short of resorting to registry hacks. It only lets you change the drive letter.

The Google Forums has a discussion going on work arounds, but most involve editing registry strings which, if done improperly can mess a lot of things up. Link here.

 

I can't imagine the internal team meeting where someone thought it was a good idea to take the folder an end user has already designated, and decide to mount it as a drive, without asking the affected user if it was okay. I can only imagine some poor sysadmin getting phone calls about why people can't find files anymore because Google Drive updated itself and stole a drive letter.

 

243480040_1587811091551074_3228607274875465089_n.png

vlcsnap-2021-10-19-21h30m19s302.png

vlcsnap-2021-10-19-21h30m27s723.png

vlcsnap-2021-10-19-21h30m41s531.png

 

 

vlcsnap-2021-10-19-21h30m47s209.png

vlcsnap-2021-10-19-21h31m24s554.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

What if it was removed with diskpart?

Asus ROG G531GT : i7-9750H - GTX 1650M +700mem - MSI RX6600 Armor 8G M.2 eGPU - Samsung 16+8GB PC4-2666 - Samsung 860 EVO 500G 2.5" - 1920x1080@145Hz (172Hz) IPS panel

Family PC : i5-4570 (-125mV) - cheap dual-pipe cooler - Gigabyte Z87M-HD3 Rev1.1 - Kingston HyperX Fury 4x4GB PC3-1600 - Corsair VX450W - an old Thermaltake ATX case

Test bench 1 G3260 - i5-4690K - 6-pipe cooler - Asus Z97-AR - Panram Blue Lightsaber 2x4GB PC3-2800 - Micron CT500P1SSD8 NVMe - Intel SSD320 40G SSD

iMac 21.5" (late 2011) : i5-2400S, HD 6750M 512MB - Samsung 4x4GB PC3-1333 - WT200 512G SSD (High Sierra) - 1920x1080@60 LCD

 

Test bench 2: G3260 - H81M-C - Kingston 2x4GB PC3-1600 - Winten WT200 512G

Acer Z5610 "Theatre" C2 Quad Q9550 - G45 Express - 2x2GB PC3-1333 (Samsung) - 1920x1080@60Hz Touch LCD - great internal speakers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, thekingofmonks said:

What if it was removed with diskpart?

I don't think it will work?

It seems to be inserting a shortcut. Would diskpart recognize that? The "drive" itself doesn't show up in device manager or disk management.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, h00ter said:

I don't think it will work?

It seems to be inserting a shortcut. Would diskpart recognize that? The "drive" itself doesn't show up in device manager or disk management.

You're right, it probably won't recognize it as anything.

Asus ROG G531GT : i7-9750H - GTX 1650M +700mem - MSI RX6600 Armor 8G M.2 eGPU - Samsung 16+8GB PC4-2666 - Samsung 860 EVO 500G 2.5" - 1920x1080@145Hz (172Hz) IPS panel

Family PC : i5-4570 (-125mV) - cheap dual-pipe cooler - Gigabyte Z87M-HD3 Rev1.1 - Kingston HyperX Fury 4x4GB PC3-1600 - Corsair VX450W - an old Thermaltake ATX case

Test bench 1 G3260 - i5-4690K - 6-pipe cooler - Asus Z97-AR - Panram Blue Lightsaber 2x4GB PC3-2800 - Micron CT500P1SSD8 NVMe - Intel SSD320 40G SSD

iMac 21.5" (late 2011) : i5-2400S, HD 6750M 512MB - Samsung 4x4GB PC3-1333 - WT200 512G SSD (High Sierra) - 1920x1080@60 LCD

 

Test bench 2: G3260 - H81M-C - Kingston 2x4GB PC3-1600 - Winten WT200 512G

Acer Z5610 "Theatre" C2 Quad Q9550 - G45 Express - 2x2GB PC3-1333 (Samsung) - 1920x1080@60Hz Touch LCD - great internal speakers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, h00ter said:

I can't imagine the internal team meeting where someone thought it was a good idea to take the folder an end user has already designated, and decide to mount it as a drive, without asking the affected user if it was okay. I can only imagine some poor sysadmin getting phone calls about why people can't find files anymore because Google Drive updated itself and stole a drive letter.

I feel like you are overestimating how many people this affects. I get that it's annoying for you since you seem to have a gazillion things mounted, but you are the exception rather than the norm.

Google could probably have asked 10,000 people and 9,999 would have been okay with this change, maybe even though it was easier to use. But that 1 other (you) see it as a big issue.

 

Or maybe I am misunderstanding you and what you mean is that if you update Google Drive, it will assign itself to G:, regardless of whether or not you already have a drive assigned to G:?

If that's what you mean then I can understand the frustration, as that seems like a massive oversight that would affect everyone with 5 or more drives mounted (which I don't think is too uncommon).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LAwLz said:

I feel like you are overestimating how many people this affects. I get that it's annoying for you since you seem to have a gazillion things mounted, but you are the exception rather than the norm.

Google could probably have asked 10,000 people and 9,999 would have been okay with this change, maybe even though it was easier to use. But that 1 other (you) see it as a big issue.

 

Or maybe I am misunderstanding you and what you mean is that if you update Google Drive, it will assign itself to G:, regardless of whether or not you already have a drive assigned to G:?

If that's what you mean then I can understand the frustration, as that seems like a massive oversight that would affect everyone with 5 or more drives mounted (which I don't think is too uncommon).

I probably am the outlier. I don't think Google would be stupid enough to steal the letter from a drive that has already been assigned G:. If anything it would pick the subsequent letters from the list.

The bigger issue is control. Making unilateral changes to someone's system, without informing them, or giving them a choice about the change, is at best bad form, and at worst, shady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

@h00ter

I created an account to thank you for your trouble of writing this down. 

I lost a drive letter (F) and didn't know how to get it back. It was there in explorer as a network drive but if I chose 'disconnect' (or 'dismount' - my system isn't English) in explorer, it would complain that the drive didn't exist.

Issuing 

net use && net share

didn't show the drive letter.

 

You may be an outlier, but in my case I don't have so many drives, but just 1 network drive that's a bit fickle. And so Google Drive determined at one point that it could steal this drive letter, wreaking havoc on my system.

So there are more scenarios in which this can be a problem and I think you're rightfully doubtful about this design decision.

(Even changing the drive letter to something unused in Google Drive didn't seem to make it available. However, just issuing

net use F: \\myshare\mydrive /persistent:Yes

connected the share to the drive letter again, without a restart.)

 

Anyway, thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I wouldn't have known where to look otherwise!

John

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×