Jump to content
6 minutes ago, Aero4 said:

And if so is it noticeable in day to day use like for example gaming or using premiere.

Long term, a better quality SSD will degrade at a reduced speed compared to a cheap one.

Spoiler

 

CPU Ryzen 5900X - Motherboard Asus ROG STRIX X570-E - RAM 16GB of G.SKILL NEON 3600 -
GPU EVGA RTX 3080 XC3 - Case Mastercase H500p mesh - PSU Seasonic Focus Gx-850 -
Corsair MP600 NVME 1 Tb, Samsung 960 PRO 500 Gb & 2 Seagate Baracuda 7200 RPM 2TB in stripe -
Display two VG27AQ 2K monitor - Cooling Corsair H150 Pro - 

Keyboard G-910 W/ Romer G tactile - Mouse G 502 Hero (wired) -
Sound Logitech X-530 and Razer Tiamat headphones

Operating System Windows 10

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Aero4 said:

And if so is it noticeable in day to day use like for example gaming or using premiere.

If you have backups of the data on the SSD, then no it doesn't really.

 

As far as raw speed/performance goes, yes, it can matter, depending on how big your files are and how new your system is. But whether you will notice said issues only you will know.

NOTE: I no longer frequent this site. If you really need help, PM/DM me and my e.mail will alert me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as you're not getting the absolute cheapest SSD from a no-name manufacturer and the drive has a DRAM cache, you won't notice much of a difference. Even side by side, I have a very hard time determining the difference between my system with an old Skull Canyon SSD (quality at the time, but still about 5 years old) and my system with a 970 Evo. As long as you aren't doing huge amounts of file transfers, you won't notice a difference. Premier IIRC uses an SSD to just get lots of small files at random, which any drive will be able to do fine, and the majority of game loading times aren't a whole lot better on SSDs no matter what.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes but only if you are side by side or have experience with other SSDs or have specific workloads which benefit from faster SSDs

 

This is typically due to the SSD cache and topology (QLC, SLC, MLC) of the chips. 

Cache size will assist in small files moving very very quickly and large folders of small files which get repeated moved (ie photographer editing huge batches of photos and exporting them to the SSD) Games also load slightly faster on drives with a cache but it's in the 1-2 seconds at most. 

Topology also plays a role when the drive starts to fill up and has to start re-arranging files to keep them in good sections of the chips. SLC (single level cells) tend to be in the highest "quality" SSDs for enterprise where any loss of data is unacceptable.

 

day to day if you are playing games, surfing the internet, office tasks etc there is little to no difference. This is also true for NVME vs Sata SSDs. 

day to day for photo editors, video editors, programmers, 3d artists etc yes there will be a noticeable difference in file load times, export times, program "snappiness" which is more true for NVME vs Sata but also quality with Cache and SLC or MLC will also make a lessor but noticeable difference if you have used both good (Samsung Pro, Corsair 400) vs bad (KingDian) ssds

The best gaming PC is the PC you like to game on, how you like to game on it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×