Jump to content
3 minutes ago, Tuan said:

Is this normal or am I doing something wrong?

It's normal. Manufacturers like to report their devices' sizes in multiples of 1000 bytes whereas Windows counts it as it should be, ie. in multiples of 1024 bytes, so that's why the disparity.

Hand, n. A singular instrument worn at the end of the human arm and commonly thrust into somebody’s pocket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a difference in units. 

 

Windows is actually reporting in Mebi/Gibi bytes, which is base 2. Mega/Giga bytes are base 10, which is what the drives are advertised in for capacity. 

 

1TB drives will almost always show as 931GB in WIndows. 931 Gibibytes is equal to 1000 Gigabytes.

 

Windows actually uses the wrong abbreviations. It should be using GiB and MiB rather than GB and MB. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

30 minutes ago, Oshino Shinobu said:

It's a difference in units. 

 

Windows is actually reporting in Mebi/Gibi bytes, which is base 2. Mega/Giga bytes are base 10, which is what the drives are advertised in for capacity. 

 

1TB drives will almost always show as 931GB in WIndows. 931 Gibibytes is equal to 1000 Gigabytes.

 

Windows actually uses the wrong abbreviations. It should be using GiB and MiB rather than GB and MB. 

 

31 minutes ago, WereCatf said:

It's normal. Manufacturers like to report their devices' sizes in multiples of 1000 bytes whereas Windows counts it as it should be, ie. in multiples of 1024 bytes, so that's why the disparity.



I appreciate the reply fellas . learned something new today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×