5600 XT

[VOC]

Is there a lot of variation in the FPS in the different 5600 XT's?

Or should I just get the cheapest one, with atleast 2 fans?

[Jurrunio]

5 minutes ago, VOC said:

Is there a lot of variation in the FPS in the different 5600 XT's?

Not really

 

5 minutes ago, VOC said:

Or should I just get the cheapest one, with atleast 2 fans?

2 fans can still suck, so this tactic is only good if you dont mind the noise.

[The Hugo Stiglitz]

Some have a bios update that boost clock speed. Make sure to get one that does. The 5600 xt is a great card, just make sure drivers, v bios and motherboard bios are all up to date.

 

https://www-pcworld-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.pcworld.com/article/3516108/amd-radeon-rx-5600-xt-graphics-cards-vbios-confusion.amp.html?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a6&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#amp_tf=From %1%24s&aoh=16064435850849&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pcworld.com%2Farticle%2F3516108%2Famd-radeon-rx-5600-xt-graphics-cards-vbios-confusion.html

[Jorgeabel123]

There's some variation, you can tell by just looking at the speed clocks. Low end versions have a boost clock of 1620MHz while high-end version have 1750MHz, which should translate in nearly 8% more fps, I actually just bought my 5600xt a week ago and after spending quite a lot of time looking at benchmarksand reviews I think I can give you good advice...

 

If you reallly want to cut your budget, go for the cheapeast one you find, only avoiding the gigabyte windforce.

If you want a good price/performance ratio go for the Sapphire Pulse (the one with the 1750MHz boost clock, not the newer BE version) or the Asus Dual Evo, whichever you find at the lower price.

 

I got the Asus since I found a pretty good deal for it. I overclocked it to 1820MHz (which is pretty easy to do) and is running great, it barely gets to 73°C with the fan running silently at default speed and it won't pass 65°C with the fans running at 100%.