32k Gaming?

[LinusFan2]

Could 16k gaming work with 2x2 8k monitors with dedicated graphic cards for each monitor work? Or 32k? 

[Fasauceome]

No, the GPUs can't work together that way

[Praesi]

No. 4 way SLI never worked well and never will.

Everything above 2 way SLI is pointless and counter productive and neither NVidia nor AMD will put any effort in it.

Even 2 way SLI is 99% unsupported.

[GhostRoadieBL]

23 minutes ago, LinusFan2 said:

Could 16k gaming work with 2x2 8k monitors with dedicated graphic cards for each monitor work? Or 32k? 

that would take a deep dive into the RTX Quatro cards and see how well they share VRAM, not possible on RTX3000 series as the frame size is just too large even with 2 way nv-link 3090s it's too much data to drive. Quatro runs a very different link standard and "can" "share" VRAM but you could hook up 4 monitors to one card or 1 monitor to each card and it will do the same thing (curious hot hot the connectors would get driving 4x 8k data streams through a single card)

[Roswell]

Those jumps are 4x increases, not 2.

 

16K would need 4 8K screens to replicate it. 32K would need 16 8K screens (or 64 4K screens).

 

We’re nowhere remotely near being able to drive the equivalent of 64 4K screens with current video card hardware. It will be a long, long time.

[Sarra]

4 hours ago, LinusFan2 said:

Could 16k gaming work with 2x2 8k monitors with dedicated graphic cards for each monitor work? Or 32k? 

That would be 24k, not 32k.

 

Either way, the current hardware wouldn't support it, unless you were running a bunch of PC's on a LAN in Flight Simulator X with WideFS installed. There's some bonkers WideFS based gaming setups people have done; It essentially lets multiple PC's sync what's happening in Flight Simulator, so you can run multiple PC's to drive even more multiple monitors.

[LogicalDrm]

-> Moved to Graphics Cards

[dilpickle]

The cards have 4 outputs. It should be able to drive four 8k displays right? Set it up as surround and try a really old game.