Pc

[Lukass]

Pc:
Cpu: Ryzen 5 2600 6 cores 12 threads Psu: 750Watt (Dont know what kind) Gpu: 1060 3gb (msi) Ram: 16 GB 2x8 3000 mhz Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M Hdd: 1 tb SSD: 240 gb and a 1080p monitor S22C300 
Will this pc run Most games over 60 frames per second on like med settings . The most important games are Rust, Gta V, Far Cry 5,Apex Legends, The witcher 3 and Watch dogs 2

[gbergeron]

2 minutes ago, Lukas 1060 fx 8150 said:

Pc:
Cpu: Ryzen 5 2600 6 cores 12 threads Psu: 750Watt (Dont know what kind) Gpu: 1060 3gb (msi) Ram: 16 GB 2x8 3000 mhz Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M Hdd: 1 tb SSD: 240 gb and a 1080p monitor S22C300 
Will this pc run Most games over 60 frames per second on like med settings . The most important games are Rust, Gta V, Far Cry 5,Apex Legends, The witcher 3 and Watch dogs 2

Yes it will.

[TetraSky]

On medium settings? Yeah, without any issues.

[Lukass]

Just now, TetraSky said:

On medium settings? Yeah, without any issues.

I was scared because someone said that gtx 1060 3gb is so weak and my gpu will hardly bottleneck my cpu it is not true?

[TetraSky]

While the 1060 is on the "low/mid" side, it's by no means a "weak GPU".

It will technically "bottleneck" the CPU... But that's just because the CPU won't be able to stretch its leg as much as if you had a $2000 GPU in there.

A bottleneck caused by a low end GPU is not as bad as a bottleneck from a low end CPU.

You'll be getting the best performances that can be obtained from your GPU at least, which is the important bit for gaming.

 

That said, why not get the successor card, the 1660? Not only is it "better", it's also 6GB and not that much more expensive (nearly the same price really)

Because honestly, that 3GB model, will hurt later on.

[Lukass]

yeah i wanted to get 1660 but i had 1060 earlier so yeah.