Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

VA Panels

A Shiny Bidoof
 Share

I'm looking to upgrade my monitor to a 1440 144hz display which i should be able to hit 100+ frames on some games with a 1080ti and i7 8700k. I was looking at possible Acer and Asus lines which are some what affordable. But then I came across the Acer Predator Z321QU bmiphzx. It is a curved 2k 144hz display with G-Sync and a VA panel. It advertises a 4ms GTG response time similar to its IPS counter part. With this monitor being relativley cheaper than its IPS and TN counterparts is the response time really that good or will it just turn out as bad as VA panels are expected to be when it comes to gaming?

Side question:Does upscaling a game i.e. using 1080p res on a 1440p monitor have any affect on the game itself such as higher response times, input lag, etc.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

For gaming TN is the fastest, VA in the middle and IPS is the worse.

But for picture quality you could reverse the order.

So to be safe, VA is the middle ground.

Ryzen 3600 @ 4.5ghz all cores | Asrock B550M Steel Legend | Radeon RX580 | 2x Samsung 16gb c-die 2666 @ 3600mhz cl16 | 500gb WD SN750 | 9 TB HDD | Deepcool Gammax 400 w/ 2 delta 4000rpm push pull | Antec Neo Eco Zen 500w

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, SupaKomputa said:

VA in the middle and IPS is the worse.

Switch those two around.

 

Still a good choice though.

My Build, v2.1 --- CPU: i7-8700K @ 5.2GHz/1.288v || MoBo: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E Gaming || RAM: 4x4GB G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 2666 14-14-14-33 || Cooler: Custom Loop || GPU: EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC Black, on water || PSU: EVGA G2 850W || Case: Corsair 450D || SSD: 850 Evo 250GB, Intel 660p 2TB || Storage: WD Blue 2TB || G502 & Glorious PCGR Fully Custom 80% Keyboard || MX34VQ, PG278Q, PB278Q

Audio --- Headphones: Massdrop x Sennheiser HD 6XX || Amp: Schiit Audio Magni 3 || DAC: Schiit Audio Modi 3 || Mic: Blue Yeti

 

[Under Construction]

 

My Truck --- 2002 F-350 7.3 Powerstroke || 6-speed

My Car --- 2006 Mustang GT || 5-speed || BBK LTs, O/R X, MBRP Cat-back || BBK Lowering Springs, LCAs || 2007 GT500 wheels w/ 245s/285s

 

The Experiment --- CPU: i5-3570K @ 4.0 GHz || MoBo: Asus P8Z77-V LK || RAM: 16GB Corsair 1600 4x4 || Cooler: CM Hyper 212 Evo || GPUs: Asus GTX 750 Ti, || PSU: Corsair TX750M Gold || Case: Thermaltake Core G21 TG || SSD: 840 Pro 128GB || HDD: Seagate Barracuda 2TB

 

R.I.P. Asus X99-A motherboard, April 2016 - October 2018, may you rest in peace. 5820K, if I ever buy you a new board, it'll be a good one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LukeSavenije said:

Va is about the same as ips, but with better whites and worse blacks

Doesn't VA have better blacks than IPS?

Intel Xeon X5670 6c/12t @ 4.40GHz, Asus P6X58D-E, 24GB Corsair XMS3 1600MHz, Asus GTX 960 Turbo OC, 250GB & 120GB SSD, 4TB and 2x 2TB HDD, Fractal Design Define R5

PC 2: Intel Xeon E5-2690 8c/16t @ 3.3-3.8GHz, ThinkStation S30 (C600/X79), 64GB (4x 16GB) DDR3 1600MHz, GeForce GT 640 GDDR5, 500GB HDD

PC 3: Intel Core i7-3770 4c/8t @ 4.22-4.43GHz, Asus P8Z77-V LK, 16GB DDR3 1854MHz, Asus GTX 760 DC2 OC, 250GB Crucial MX500 and 2x 500GB HDD

Laptop: Lenovo ThinkPad T440p, Intel Core i7-4800MQ 4c/8t @ 2.7-3.7GHz, 12GB DDR3 1600MHz , NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M, 250GB Samsung SSD, 14" 1080p IPS, 100Wh battery

Phone: Huawei Honor 9 64GB + 256GB card Watch: Motorola Moto 360 1st Gen.

General X58 Xeon/i7 discussion

Some other PC's:

Spoiler

Some of the specs of these systems might not be up to date

PC 4: Intel Xeon X5677 @ 3.47GHz, HP 0B4Ch (X58), 12GB DDR3 1333MHz, Asus GeForce GTX 660 DC2, 240GB SSD, 1TB HDD

PC 5: Intel Xeon W3550 @ 3.07GHz, HP (X58), 8GB DDR3, NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 (GPU: 1050MHz MEM: 1250MHz), 120GB SSD, 2TB, 1TB and 500GB HDD

PC 6: Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 @ 3.8GHz, Asus P5KC, 8GB DDR2, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, 120GB SSD and 500GB HDD

HTPC: Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz, HP DC7900SFF, 8GB DDR2 800MHz, Asus Radeon HD 6570, 240GB SSD and 3TB HDD

WinXP PC: Intel Core2 Duo E6300 @ 2.33GHz, Asus P5B, 2GB DDR2 667MHz, NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT, 32GB SSD and 80GB HDD

RetroPC: Intel Pentium 4 HT @ 3.0GHz, Gigabyte GA-8SGXLFS, 2gb DDR1, ATi Radeon 9800 Pro, 2x 40gb HDD

My first PC: Intel Celeron 333MHz, Diamond Micronics C400, 384mb RAM, Diamond Viper V550 (NVIDIA Riva TNT), 6gb and 8gb HDD

Server: 2x Intel Xeon E5420, Dell PowerEdge 2950, 32gb DDR2, ATI ES1000, 4x 146gb SAS

Dual Opteron PC: 2x 6-core AMD Opteron 2419EE, HP XW9400, 32GB DDR2, ATI Radeon 3650, 500gb HDD

Core2 Duo PC: Intel Core2 Duo E8400, HP DC7800, 4gb DDR2, NVIDIA Quadro FX1700, 1tb and 80gb HDD

Athlon XP PC: AMD Athlon XP 2400+, MSI something, 1,5gb DDR1, ATI Radeon 9200, 40gb HDD

Thinkpad: Intel Core2 Duo T7200, Lenovo Thinkpad T60, 4gb DDR2, ATI Mobility Radeon X1400, 1tb HDD

Pentium 3 PC: Intel Pentium 3 866MHz, Asus CUSL2-C, 512mb RAM, 3DFX VooDoo 3 2000 AGP

Laptop: Dell Latitude E6430, Intel Core i5-3210M, 6gb DDR3 1600MHz , Intel HD 4000, 250gb Samsung SSD 860 EVO, 1TB WD Blue HDD

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Pasi123 said:

Doesn't VA have better blacks than IPS?

Yeah, must have turned that around by accident. My bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

@A Shiny Bidoof

 

VA is imo the least worst of the 3 LCD panel types.

(dont get me wrong LCD sucks in general ,but still)

 

Ignore manufactuer stated resposne times. They are always incorrect, or at the very least dont explain what measurment they are taking.

 

You will need to find a reviewer that does a proper pixel response test and check the full range of times the results show. Then compare them against other monitors that reviewer has reviewed to get an idea of what ur looking at.

To give you an idea of how usless the manufactuer stated resposne times are, you should know that many reviewers list out a whole range of response time figures. Such as the 0-80% and 80-0% transition times, the the 80-100% and 100-80% times ..0-20% .. 0-50% etc etc. The times can be anywhere from 1 ms to 20 ms, and will always be different to what the manufacuter states. And each manufacuter will use a different method and choose a diferent specific measurment to advertise.

So do please ignroe them

 

That said. VA panels is, imo, the least worst in terms of picture quality, but do have some of the slowest pixel reposne times, which can cause ghosting/bluring. So you need to find one which has been properly tested and check those pixel times.

 

Dont worry about input lag, very few monitors, especialy gaming orientated ones, will have input lag figures high enough to worry about. That and manufactuers dont actualy specifiy input lag figures. (reponse time is not input lag/latency)

 

TN have horrible colors and color shifting, and IPS has horrible IPS glow ontop of the usual backlight bleed common across all LCD panel types, epsiecialy in monitors as they seem to have a more lax QA in regards to BLB vs TV's.

CPU: Intel i7 3930k w/OC & EK Supremacy EVO Block | Motherboard: Asus P9x79 Pro  | RAM: G.Skill 4x4 1866 CL9 | PSU: Seasonic Platinum 1000w Corsair RM 750w Gold (2021)|

VDU: Panasonic 42" Plasma | GPU: Gigabyte 1080ti Gaming OC & Barrow Block | Sound: Asus Xonar D2X - Z5500 -FiiO X3K DAP/DAC - ATH-M50S | Case: Phantek Enthoo Primo White |

Storage: Samsung 850 Pro 1TB SSD + WD Blue 1TB SSD | Cooling: XSPC D5 Photon 270 Res & Pump | 2x XSPC AX240 White Rads | NexXxos Monsta 80x240 Rad P/P | NF-A12x25 fans |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


×