Search the Community
Showing results for tags '10900k'.
-
Need some insights, maybe anyone went through this before. I have a Z490 MEG ACE, paired with i9-10900k. A week ago I had a problem when I booted my PC, it went straight to BIOS and loaded defaults. I activated XMP, saved and everything was OK until today. For the record, yesterday I was on the PC for 4-5 hours with no problems, turned it off normaly. Today the PC did not start, no power. The led on power button on the board is on. I tried to check out the issue. I checked cable connections from PSU, cleaned everything up, removed everything, even RAM. My first guess was the PSU. I tried 2 different PSUs, but I only had at hand models with only 1 8-pin connectors to test. The same happens, led on the power button is on when I plug it in, nothing works, PC doesn't start. Tomorrow I need to try to fix it because I have work to and depend on it. Do I really need the 2 8-pin connectors to at least get the fans going? Or should I look into the CPU/Motherboard instead?
-
My CPU would hit 100c under load, I've tried everything from re-applying T-paste to RMA the chip and nothing. The only solution I found is going into the BIOS and turning OFF MCE, Turbo Boost and Intel speed shift. Just sits at a solid 3.7ghz- That's no fun right? But it was my only solution to "tame" this CPU and keep temps normal. Well after 3 years (wow time fly's), I just want to get more outta this processor. Hell, even 4.7ghz id be happy. So, here are my specs (2020 top-tier build lol)- Intel Core i9 10900kf Gigabyte z490 Aorus Pro AX ddr4-3200 64gb Nvidia rtx3080 Corsair h100i cooler I inserted my CPU-Z report file below PEREZ-PC.txt I went back into my BIOS and enabled Turbo boost and speed shift EXCEPT MCE, put my multipliers at 41x- And its been fine. Highest temp I got was mmm 90c running Cinebench, which is still high but at least not 100c. While gaming I got 75c-78c, I was ok with that. What core voltage can you suggest I use in Intel XTU other than using the multipliers? What offset voltage? Should I have my Core ICCMax set to 255.75a? What about my Turbo boost power max set to unlimited? Any advice would be greatly appreciated
-
So im currently buying parts for my new pc and i already ordered my asus strix 3090 OC and was going to buy the intel i9 10900k cpu which only supports pci 3.0 but i just noticed that the i9 11900k that does 4.0 will be released the 30th this month So my question is the following Would it even be worth it going for the 11900k for the pci 4.0 when using a 3090 or is 3.0 fine? People says the 11900k is worse in gaming compared to the 10900k but i was wondering if using a 3090 which supports pci 4.0 would make a difference in gaming when actually utilizing the pci 4.0 instead of 3.0 and might get better frames than the 10900k because of using 4.0 instead of 3.0? any thoughts? -
Hi, After AMD launched their new CPUs its becoming more confusing on which is better for gaming? more cores? threads, speed? the 5600x destroyed all theories that more cores is better or more clock speed is better, having a CPU like the 5600x with 6 cores and 12 threads @4.6ghz beating 8 cores 16 threads intel CPU like the 9900K or 10900K @5.ghz? does buying 5600x future proof? I mean only 6 cores and 12 threads @4.6ghz! what games really want? cores or more speed, do game fully utilize the threads or not?
-
I just built a new pc with a msi z490, 850 evga psu, 32 gbs gskill ripjaws, gtx1080, intel 10900k. So the issue is I will turn the computer on and it will get stuck at the gpu debug led everything else works as far as USB or fans. After about 10 mins or less it will show the screen .I've tried clearing cmos, Making sure the cpu was set correctly and tried it without a GPU using onboard graphics. if any one has seen this before let me know. I don't think its the gpu tho -
So i have looked at some gaming benchmarks and noticed that is some games the 10900k is better than the 11900k and some its not. I decided to buy the 10900k since i noticed in this video that it has almost same fps in a lot of games if not even better fps in some. Just wanted to post here since im still in a small doubt if im choosing the right cpu of the 2 and just wanted to ask anybody here if they think im doing the right choice or should i buy the 11900k? Reason i want to be 100% sure im picking the right CPU is because im doing a full custom EK loop on my pc and i dont want to take it apart in a few months because i picked the wrong cpu btw my build is going to be following intel i9 10900k (maybe 11900k) asus strix 3090 OC (already have) Asus maximus XIII Hero (already have) G.Skill Trident Z Royal 32gb 3200 mhz (ordering soon) Full EK custom loop on GPU and CPU Will be gaming on 1440p but might upgrade to 4K later on Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction if i should stick with the 10900k or if i should buy the 11900k instead PC will be for gaming only and no video edition or anything like that at all
-
I've recently just built my first PC and am running into GPU issues right off the bat. Specs are below. With the first post, and trying to get Windows installed, anytime I would exit and restart the BIOS, I would get a code 97 occasionally. I'd reset, then it would post like normal. I am plugged into the GPU at this point. Fast forward to after Windows is installed. Before updates and drivers, I'm having no issues. I can access the existing NVIDEA control panel that showed up on first boot and adjust resolution, frame rate, etc. However, after applying updates and installing latest drivers, this is when I run into my issues. When I try to boot now, I'll get the same code 97 or it will boot to the login screen, BUT from there will either freeze as I try to enter the password, login but then immediately blue screen, or auto-restart and then boot to the screen that says that Windows encountered an issue. At the same time of those happening, the fans on the GPU will spin up to max rpm. Ultimately, to boot the machine to do anything, I have to switch the monitor to the integrated graphics display port, which allows me to boot with no issues. If the GPU is still in the PCIe slot when rebooting with integrated graphics, the GPU fans will also spin up to full rpm and will continue to run until the system is restarted or powered down. If it's relevant, I also have no issues running on integrated graphics when the GPU is completely removed from the system. I've uninstalled/reinstalled NVIDEA drivers, re-seated the card into the PCIe slot, and changed the PCIe power cable, all with no luck. My final test has been swapping the card to the bottom PCIe slot. Doing this caused me to get a code 96. However, after the third attempt of powering back up, it booted normally and the card seemed to start functioning correctly. I was able to access the NVIDEA controller again and even run 3DMark with no issues. However, restarting or shutting down then rebooting, will send me back to code 96, and once again require 3-4 tries or resetting before actually getting anywhere. So at this point I just don't know if I have a PCIe problem on the motherboard or if I have a bad GPU. Side note, the GPU came from Newegg advertised as new. The box and anti-static were sealed but I noticed that the yellow electrostatic sensitive sticker was already torn in half. Additionally, the protective plastic that normally covers the chrome part of the card was already missing. So I have my thoughts that the card I bought is refurbed or like-new. I've wanted to build my own PC for the longest time and am a big enthusiast, however I am new to this and what I've troubleshooted so far is all I really know what to do. I don't have any means of testing the GPU in another system since this is my first build. Any help would be nice, as I need to try to figure out pretty quick whether the GPU or motherboard need to be RMA'ed. This has definitely put a damper on the excitement of my first build. Specs: ROG Strix Z490-E Intel Core i9-10900K NVIDEA 2080 Super FE (located in top PCIe slot) 32GB DDR4 3600Hz G.Skill Corsair M.2 MB510 960GB (Game Storage) Corsair M.2 MB510 480GB (System/Application Storage)
-
Hello, thanks for reading! I have a 10900K with a Z490 MSI Tomahawk, all I have done in BIOS is selected Game Boost, which offsets the turbo by +1, resulting in all core at 5GHz I have left voltage at auto, according to HWInfo max VCore did reach 1.40V, but only for a few seconds. At idle its around 1v. I understand that auto mode do often 'overvolt' the CPU but I don't want to do a manual 'overclock'. So, is leaving voltage at auto dangerous, surely the motherboard manufacturers wouldn't allow auto mode to go over the safe limits? -
Hi. Got a problem with high CPU temps - in gaming in can beat 90°C. On AIDA64 (stress CPU+FPU+cache) after few seconds CPU package and some cores can take 96°C, and after 2 minutes already 100°C and throttling 2-14% (even if I configure both pump and fans to run 100% always!). Idle temps about 37-43°C. CPU: i9-10900K, AIO: MSI MAG Coreliquid 360R, costs about 160$, equipped with 3x ARGB Cooler Master SickleFlow 120mm fans (AIO in front). Thermal paste: Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut, a very careful and thin layer. Motherboard MSI Z490 Gaming Carbon WiFi and RAM 8GBx4 3200MHz XMP, if it matters. Also 3 same CM fans on exhaust (2 up, 1 in the back, case MSI MPG Gungnir 110M). So all in all looks like a good enough build but I don't get why my temps would be so high. Ambient temps during this summer are about 25°C but the CPU temps during colder times were not much better. What seems to be underperforming here? Should I change my fans (they don't seem that bad tho)? Is just the pump of this AIO weak (MSI recommend this AIO for 10900K tho)? If you need any additional info or screenshots/tests, hit me up and I'll send them! P.S. Some pics of the system & screenshot included (during AIDA64 test and idles after that).
-
Is it possible to purchase an expansion card that can allocate 8x gen 3 lanes to a gen 4 Nvme SSD, thereby virtually allowing for gen. 4 performance on a system that does not support PCIe gen 4. For reference, I have an I9-10900K. My motherboard is a Z490 taichi which supports PCIe gen 4.
-
For context, I be building my PC this week. So I be running on 10900K Maximus XIII Corsair Vengeance Pro 32GB 3200mhz (2X 16GB) Arctic Liquid Freezer 360mm STRIX RTX 2080 Super ( re using it from current system ) I must mention, I be mainly using my PC for strictly gaming only. Nothing else. Not really fan of OCing either. Yes I know I have a Maximus Z590 board....don't ask it's complicated, let's leave it there. So I'm still confused with MCE, I've tried searching YouTube for comparison, but I found none...as I know MCE will definitely consume way more power that Intel intended the CPU to and thus more heat as well. I would prefer to avoid this if possible....if the FPS gain is just mediocre.... So should I turn it ON or OFF or any specific setting ?? As I saw for ASUS boards it's super confusing, there's Auto, Enable, Disable....what does what lol ?? Lastly I wanted to ask, I notice there are like two X.M.P Profiles now ??? What's the different ??? I didn't see this on my PC, but I saw it once in a YouTube video, which is also a Maximus board.
-
HI everyone, I need help as I am dealing with a weirdly behaving processor at the moment. I bought an i9 10900k used on leboncoin (french craigslist), it arrived in it's original box, everything seemed fine at the moment. When I installed it in my Gigabyte z490m gaming X the bios recognised the CPU as an i7-10700k. I updated the bios and checked the compatibility on gigabyte's website and despite off the 10900k being compatible it was stil recognised as a 10700k. I thought that I had been scammed and the CPU was relidded as it seemed to run a bit on the hot side. To check that I delidded it and it seemed to have already been opened as it was really easy to pop the IHS. But the weirdness starts here. I searched online for some images of the dies of the 10900k and 10700k. I was shocked to find that the CPU I had was indeed a 10900k, no mistake possible here I even mesured the die with callipers, (also the dies of the 10700k and 10900k are nothing alike). Oh and windows only sees 8cores and the 10900k has 10. I tried userbenchmark and I get the scores of the 10700k. What do you guys think is going on here ? If the cpu was bad why would it register as another completely different model ? Could the motherboard be bad and only detect 8 cores ? I have tried everything to understand this CPU but it is way to weird for me... Thanks in advance ! EDIT : added CPU-z screenshot 2nd EDIT : I am dumb and i misread some information about the dies, this is just a regular scam
-
I've already turn MCE off, yet this CPU run rather hot. I don't want to go into too many details. I'm using a Maximus XIII Hero board, is there any other features I can turn off to help me CPU run cooler ? Even with MCE off It still consume more than 125W even in games. If I were to run Cinebench it keep it at 4.9 Ghz when near end it will drop, so I guess MCE is turn off indeed. But It was consuming much as 1.35 - 1.36V.... Is there some way to like Undervolt or even further limit the amount of power consumption ?? I never really OC before, I'm not even sure how to Undervolt a CPU. -
I made a list of all the tasks I do in front of my PC. Can you please help me choose the best CPU to make my work and game as smooth as possible? I do not have a budget limit but i like to pay a fair price for what I get. I consider the following CPUs: Ryzen 9 5900X (available for 788$) Ryzen 7 5800X (available for 733$) Ryzen 9 3950X (available for 855$) Intel i9-10900K (availablefor 652$) At the moment I run the i7-3770K OC to 4,8 Ghz, GTX 1080 ti, 3 Samsung SSD, DDR3 RAM. I am planning to upgrade my CPU, MOBO, RAM, m2 and cooling. In the future I will also upgrade my GPU. I heard the 10900K is best for OC, is this true (I will do OC)? Constantly: Google Chrome (heavy sites that use satelite images, maps, video). Moving around the computer (folders, loading photos etc.) Excel (big, slow files) PDFs reading (big, slow files) Everyday: Photoshop Games: Apex Legends, Cyberpunk 2077, GTA V, Forza Horizon 4, Red Dead Redemption 2, The Witcher 3, Control, Death Stranding, World of Warcraft. Future plans: Virutal Reality (games etc.) - Often OCR of books - Rarely Virtual machines - Rarely Red - Most important for me -
whats best cpu for gaming now? i mainly play wow and budget is not a problem. cant decide between i9 10900k and ryzen 5900x for gaming only. i use an rtx 2080 super with old intel i7 6700k and i get 144 fps with 144 refresh rate also gaming at 1440p.
-
I just got a 10900kf and a aorus z490 elite AC and whenever I put an SSD in the first port the computer will spin fans and light up but I get no signal nothing at all no noise from the speaker or the you got a problem lights on the board however when I move the SSD too the bottom port it works just fine I'm really not sure what's up and am out of ideas https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B087GFYBCW/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apap_NWBvr7WAtAPSB that is the mother board I have 10900kf Nzxt m22 16gb 3200mhz 5700xt 256gb WD black NVME m.2 650w gold modular PSU swapped the PSU before I figured out it was the m.2 with a 700w bronze however the 650w have the 12 pin for the cpu but the 700w doesn't. Ive tested the ram/slots the cooling PSU and all the connections and the GPU the only thing that causes the no post is putting the m.2 in the first shielded m.2 port I would greatly appreciate some help as I'm out of ideas and am waiting to hear back from gigabyte thanks in advance
-
Hey guys, as the title suggest I'm one of those impatient twats who even if he has to wait for the GPU can't help himself from buying everything else [irony] because, I mean, I can set up the system in advance, right....? [/irony] So, given that I already cued for a 3080 a few weeks ago, I decided to ditch the AMD option (I was going to wait for the 5900x, but nobody got time fo' that) mostly because again, I'm both an impatient twat and a little bit (i swear!) of an Intel fanboy - and go for the well established 10900k. I'll list the specs down below, and while knowing that this is going to be an amazing system I fully acknowledge how November the 5th might outdate this rig (which still has bits in the mail) already. CPU Intel i-10900k Motherboard MSI Z490 Gaming Edge WiFi RAM Crucial Ballistix DDR4 3600Mhz - 2x16GB GPU Gigabyte RTX 3080 Gaming OC 10G Case Phanteks P500a Storage Samsung 970EVO Plus - 500GB Crucial MX500 - 1TB Seagate IronWolf NAS - 4TB PSU bequiet! Straight Power 11 - 850W Platinum Display AOC 24G2U/BK - 1080p/144Hz/1ms Cooling Noctua NH-D25s Keyboard Aukey KM-G12 Mouse Mad Catz R.A.T. 8+ (I SWEAR I WANTED A R.A.T. EVER SINCE I WAS A KID I'M CRYING) Please be nice, my wallet isn't as big as these specs might make you think and I'm already kinda frustrated enough. -
I changed the name of this thread as it has evolved into something totally different in a good way. I'm just going to copy and paste my one previous post on this thread. Okay, so just so I know I'm understanding this correctly: Right now I'm using adaptive. I have the adaptive max turbo voltage set to 1.629 and the offset to +0.001. Let's say the VID for 4.8 is 1v just for simplicity. If I adjust the V/F point offset for 4.8 by lets say +0.039; at load for 4.8 the vcore would be asking for 1v + 0.039v + 0.001v for a total of 1.4v? And at idle for 4.8, instead of just the 1v, the vcore will be asking for 1v + 0.039v, resulting in a higher temperature? I've been doing research for about a month (Clearly I wasnt trying hard enough), and I haven't been able to fully understand how adaptive works. Now if what I said is correct, instead of offsetting the VID for 4.8 by +0.039, I can instead offset the adaptive max turbo voltage from +0.001 to +0.040 to get the same affect at load for 4.8, but also have a lower temp when idling at 4.8? Also changing the offset for adaptive max turbo voltage won't only change what is requested for the vcore for 4.8, but also all the other VID's? Each request at load will be adding the +0.040v? Hopefully I've got that all right, and if I do, it brings me to my last question. What does the max turbo adaptive voltage even do if all that is happening is adding the offset to the vid? -
I've got the Intel i9 10900K and EK-Quantum Magnitude Nickel Acetal and I'm wondering if it is okay to use Liquid Metal between the two? I'm not sure what material the IHS of the 10900K is made of, so I just want to be sure of that and if it is safe to use Liquid Metal between these two parts. Another question is, will I notice much of a difference using Liquid Metal between the IHS and CPU Block rather than just regular Thermal Paste?
-
Hi Guys, For christmas i treated myself a bit and bought a used 10900k, great chip. It didn't take long for me to try and overclock it Situation: I found that my chip runs stabel at 5.2 GHZ with a fixed voltage of 1.375V in Bios with LLC 5 --> Vcore under load 1.361V around mid 80s Since I don't want to pump all this voltage all the time i decided to use adaptive voltage with Vcore set in Bios to 1.375V. I figured out quickly that it gets ignored and Vcore goes up to 1.467V which is to much for me and probably the cpu. What i have done: So i started googleing and found that it gets ignored because of V/F curve targets (have a basic understanding of how it works now) I found that LLC8 (MSI LLC --> high number high vdroop) it runs at about Vcore 1.37V under load and 1.47 while at 5.2 GHZ not underload --> again to high. From my understanding and experience i dont feel comfortable leaving the voltage at "auto" (VF curve) as it is now. So the question is: Is there a way to some how "fake"/override the VF curve to a fixed target voltage? e.g. target 1.375V My setup MSI z490 Godlike (power delivery shouldn't be a problem) i9 10900k (works totally normal at stock speeds) Custom loop 2*480 rads (so cooling is not the issue) OC stable: 5.2 GHZ LLC5 (MSI Vdroop --> higher number = higher vdroop, LLC1-8, LLC no vdroop) Greatful for any advice Rngds -
I am saving for a computer, and want absolute maximum fps at 1080p for Fortnite. I play competitive, and my frames drop in the endgame, so I am upgrading my computer. I want to heavily overclock a 10900k. I want to know whether a Deepcool Assassin III can handle the max 330 watt power draw of the 10900k. I going to be gaming and streaming if possible, using CPU encoding. GPU encoding seems to rubber band the game when using a face can. My second choice is an EVGA CLC 360 for maximum cooling performance, though I don't want to deal with an aio dying anytime soon.
-
Hey should I wait for the 10th gen Intel chips to be available in my region or go for ryzen 3700x for my all rounder build (gaming, workstation purposes) (but more leaning towards gaming)
-
Hey guys, I currently have been gaming on laptops until now and my dream is to build the biggest baddest non essential over the top custom water cooled pc of my life for the first time. My pc part wishlist: cpu: 10900k gpu: 3080ti mobo: z490 Godlike psu: Corsair Ax1600i case: Corsair obsidian 1000d storage: boot drive 500gb Evo plus ssD A 2tb Evo plus ssd and an hdd with 14tb cooling: Custom water cooled loops with 2 480mm rads and 1 420mm rad in a push-pull fan config with over 18 fans (gets pretty hot where i live) Now the question is about ram: I have read alot on ram but I am still a bit dense when it comes to choosing the right ram. Z490 Godlike supports 5000mhz 2 slots ddr4 ram but i was reading that the 10900k maximum supports only 2933 mhz of ram speed. So how do i make sense of that? Am i missing something? Also which ram would you guys recommend? Speed and brand wise? I am fine with either 32 or 64gb total ram. -
Im looking to buy the 10900k and was wondering if either asus rog strix z490-f gaming or asus prime z490-a would be enough. Im also a beginner overclocker and would like to be able to overclock the cpu. Also what amount of psu watts is good for 10900k and 2080/2080 super, since i want to do some basic overclocking.
-
With the new ryzen series coming out an Intel 10th gen desktop chips pushing 10 cores of their own. Is there really any benefit to running an X series chip anymore? I feel like with the increased clock speed and cork out that ryzen offers the x-series platform feels dead. No one throws them up for any kind of comparison on benchmarks. I mean one was information if it's worth upgrading or not or just building AMD?
.png)
