MadOne627

I think i figured it out. In the manual it says to go to the 8th setting and it defaults to the addressable header. Hope this helps.
 
 

They should fire whoever came up with the 2013 logos. Those were really bad. 2010 logos were the best balance, which is why the new ones are an evolution of those. 
 
Not that I think it's an improvement. They look like their invoking the process of playing with blocks when you're 5 years old.

Animation quality usually refers to the smoothness of the animation. Art quality usually refers to the actual art in the show. Overall quality comes from a lot of factors that can be mixed and matched in different ways. For me, if I enjoy a show enough, I can overlook its more minor shortcomings.

I love this.
 

 

 

You seen FMA, FMA brotherhood, Baccano or, kids on the slope?

Step 1: verify that we are actually living in a 'real' world
    

It should be 300 percent more pixels not more on screen. the size of the screen is the same 27 inches but for each pixel on the 1920 screen their are four pixels on the 4k. Another way to put it is 1920 pixels * the 1080 pixel tall  means it has 2,073,600 pixel total, While the 4k which is 3840 across and 2160 tall which equals 8,294,400 pixels. This is where the 300 percent more comes form. However since they are both the same sized monitor (27 inches) you do not get more screen but instead a clearer image.
 
(upon reviewing this post i realized that this may seem condescending to AluminumTech. The post isn't directed at you I just wanted to inform those who were interested)
They do this kind of stuff with all kind if tech. Give it a simple name so they don't need to explain it to those who don't care (cough Nintendo HD rumble cough). However in this case i understand you anger. They are just wrong. 

I like the price but i don't feel the need to rush out and buy it. I really want to play zelda but it launches with the Wii U the same day. I might wait for Fire Emblem or the new Mario

Your quote made me thing. What if Nintendo is trying to bring there DS market into their console market. This would mean most of these people are interested in ds, phone, or tablet games. This would mean things like a quality drop like the unofficial stats would mean nothing to them. The vast majority of 3ds owners really only care about the nintendo specific games any way. I only have one for pokemon and fire emblem.
 
Also if their venture to get third parties to make games for it fails they still keep their mobile platform alive and could claim that the switch was a great addition to their mobile gaming market. Seems like a no lose Senerio for Nintendo, while also having a chance to pull in all the Wii only buyers.  

Your quote made me thing. What if Nintendo is trying to bring there DS market into their console market. This would mean most of these people are interested in ds, phone, or tablet games. This would mean things like a quality drop like the unofficial stats would mean nothing to them. The vast majority of 3ds owners really only care about the nintendo specific games any way. I only have one for pokemon and fire emblem.
 
Also if their venture to get third parties to make games for it fails they still keep their mobile platform alive and could claim that the switch was a great addition to their mobile gaming market. Seems like a no lose Senerio for Nintendo, while also having a chance to pull in all the Wii only buyers.