Jump to content

Did I make the wrong choice going with the 2600?

My cousin was reading a article saying that the 8400 is better for gaming and single core workload, 

I do some simple video editing and background editing for my uncle e-hardware store ads and videos. 

And lots of AAA gaming and emulator games 

This was my first AMD build sorry

Best Value Build List

Budget 1080p System (RGB) https://pcpartpicker.com/list/7v2Lmq - (this build comes with two free games with the RX 570) 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/967220-productivitygaming-cpu-needed/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Performance wise for single and quad core would be almost the same for the 2600 and the 8400.
The Ryzen 2600 excels even further at multi-core scoring.

And you can actually overclock the living hell out of the ryzen.
You've made a good choice.

Unless its the 8600/8600k, then the single & quad core scoring would be much better than the 2600.

 

So You Wanna Be A Playa, But Your Rig's Ain't Fly,
You Gotta Hit Us Up, To Get A Pimped Out Rig,

You've Got To Pimp My Riggggggg...  (DAMN RIGHT)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the r5 2600 is also a very solid choice, especially for work tasks.

Also in gaming it is pretty same, because they both have the same boost clock, but amd can be overclocked, so i would argue that the r5 2600 is a better choice than the 8400.

I only see your reply if you @ me.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mikedrewsmy said:

Performance wise for single and quad core would be almost the same for the 2600 and the 8400.
The Ryzen 2600 excels even further at multi-core scoring.

And you can actually overclock the living hell out of the ryzen.
You've made a good choice.

Unless its the 8600/8600k, then the single & quad core scoring would be much better than the 2600.

 

 

3 minutes ago, Origami Cactus said:

No the r5 2600 is also a very solid choice, especially for work tasks.

Also in gaming it is pretty same, because they both have the same boost clock, but amd can be overclocked, so i would argue that the r5 2600 is a better choice than the 8400.

Thank you guys?

Best Value Build List

Budget 1080p System (RGB) https://pcpartpicker.com/list/7v2Lmq - (this build comes with two free games with the RX 570) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a Ryzen 5 1600, and I can agree that 6 cores is amazing for productivity and gaming.

Computer engineering PhD student and RFML researcher

 

Daily Driver:

CPU: Ryzen 7 4800H | GPU: RTX 2060 | RAM: 32GB DDR4 3200MHz C16 | OS: Debian 13

 

Gaming PC:

CPU: Ryzen 5 5600X | GPU: EVGA RTX 2080Ti | RAM: 32GB DDR4 3200MHz C16 | OS: Windows 11

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Galion said:

Did I make the wrong choice going with the 2600?

My cousin was reading a article saying that the 8400 is better for gaming and single core workload, 

I do some simple video editing and background editing for my uncle e-hardware store ads and videos. 

And lots of AAA gaming and emulator games 

This was my first AMD build sorry

Your cousin needs to find better information sources.

 

The only place, in gaming, you're going to find any difference is if you're running a 1080 Ti and specific games that leverage something about Intel's hardware a little better. If there's issues with emulators, that's normally an AMD GPU issue because they deprecated OpenGL support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×