Jump to content

PCI-e RAID Controller vs Built-in MB RAID Controller

If a 4 port RAID Controller (SI-PEX40057) supports 6Gbps but is only going through a PCI-e 2.0 x2 port (10GT/s)(8Gbps), wouldn't the built-in RAID controller of a MB be faster even though the MB ports are 4 x 3Gbps?  It's an old Intel board (DX79TO) and they won't answer my questions about it.

 

I can't tell if there is an actual RAID chipset on board, and if so, what it is.  From what I read, if there isn't an actual chipset on-board, this the CPU does the RAID management.  I'm not looking to increase CPU load, for sure. 

 

Also, there's some concern with loss of power and that the PCIe card will finish it's writes more reliably in that situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kind of depends on the drives you're using and how many ports you're actually using. The motherboard should provide more bandwidth in certain situations and the RAID card will provide more in other situations. If you're using hard drives, it doesn't really matter as they're not going to even use all of the 3Gbps bandwidth from SATA 2.

 

In general, the RAID card will be the more reliable option. You can actually move the RAID array if you need to and you're not completely screwed if the motherboard dies as you can rebuild the array. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you used a RAID card it would be hardware RAID you would use and it would better to a point, but unless you have ran out of SATA ports on your motherboard, and/or you need the faster speeds, the motherboard ones would be fine using software raid. As for the card it's self, get an ex enterprise one off ebay, as you can get a 8 way 6Gbps X8/16 PCIe normally pretty cheaply (you will need special SAS to 4 SATA cables but they cost about £3 each)

The owner of "too many" computers, called

The Lord of all Toasters (1920X 1080ti 32GB)

The Toasted Controller (i5 4670, R9 380, 24GB)

The Semi Portable Toastie machine (i7 3612QM (was an i3) intel HD 4000 16GB)'

Bread and Butter Pudding (i7 7700HQ, 1050ti, 16GB)

Pinoutbutter Sandwhich (raspberry pi 3 B)

The Portable Slice of Bread (N270, HAHAHA, 2GB)

Muffinator (C2D E6600, Geforce 8400, 6GB, 8X2TB HDD)

Toastbuster (WIP, should be cool)

loaf and let dough (A printer that doesn't print black ink)

The Cheese Toastie (C2D (of some sort), GTX 760, 3GB, win XP gaming machine)

The Toaster (C2D, intel HD, 4GB, 2X1TB NAS)

Matter of Loaf and death (some old shitty AMD laptop)

windybread (4X E5470, intel HD, 32GB ECC) (use coming soon, maybe)

And more, several more

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't ues motherboard raid or cheap raid cards. You know a raid card is good if it has a battery. Both of these solutions seem to use the cpu for raid calculations.

 

If you want raid your much better off using software raid. Its better at protecting data, faster, easier to manage, easier to migrate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like the opinions are all over the place.  I should have stated I'm doing RAID 10 on 4 x 256GB 6Gbps SSD cards. 

 

So, what I'm hearing is that if I try to use the on-board RAID controller, it may be software based.  And, it will probably need to rebuild the array in either case if I don't use the RAID card.  I have already used the RAID card because my old board didn't have RAID built in.  My old board died so this is my replacement.  So since I already have data on the drives, won't rebuilding the array erase everything?  Or does it just re-index all the existing data?  This is my first RAID.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×