Jump to content

Go with what your budget allows.

Case: Corsair 4000D Airflow; Motherboard: MSI ZZ490 Gaming Edge; CPU: i7 10700K @ 5.1GHz; Cooler: Noctua NHD15S Chromax; RAM: Corsair LPX DDR4 32GB 3200MHz; Graphics Card: Asus RTX 3080 TUF; Power: EVGA SuperNova 750G2; Storage: 2 x Seagate Barracuda 1TB; Crucial M500 240GB & MX100 512GB; Keyboard: Logitech G710+; Mouse: Logitech G502; Headphones / Amp: HiFiMan Sundara Mayflower Objective 2; Monitor: Asus VG27AQ

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/85072-intel-vs-amd/#findComment-1157383
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly it's pretty hard to compare two behemoth companies as a whole. Intel CPUs are generally more expensive, and from a technical standpoint, are better for gaming. AMD CPUs however are generally cheaper and worse from gaming. If you don't skimp on your CPU, either one will be fine. It all boils down to your usage scenario. On a budget and just gaming? AMD. Workstation PC with extremely high/no budget? Intel.

 

Spoiler

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/85072-intel-vs-amd/#findComment-1157411
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

AMD is usually better for both

My Build Log on PCPartPicker FX-6300, ASUS M5A78L-M/USB3, MSI 7870 GHz Edition, Corsair Vengeance LP 1x8GB, 1TB WD Blue, Fractal Core 1000 USB 3.0, Corsair CX600, and my most recent addition that I've had forever and isnt new is a 80GB WD800 for Linux, Lenovo ThinkPad X131e, ASUS Transformer TF300T, Galaxy Note 3 Sister dropped it in a puddle I now have to use a Samsung Brightside, Beyerdynamic DT990 Pro 250ohm version, Blue Yeti  #TheRealKEH-JEFF | "Sometimes, if were lucky, in Australia, a family has 2 kangaroos to pick up the kids with" - marto | Your entry here | Remember kids; just because Linus has a video on it, doesn't mean that its the best choice | ts3.wferr.com the best TeamSpeak Abide by the CoC | Looking for build help? Read this before posting |
Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/85072-intel-vs-amd/#findComment-1157431
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Intel has the higher end processors, but many of them are very expensive. Up to a certain point AMD processors can no longer really compete with Intel's processors, at least not performance-wise. But that doesn't mean that AMD processors suck. An 8350 is still an absolutely capable processor, that can compete with the gaming oriented core processors from Intel. If it comes down to budget, yes AMD is starting to shine.

CPU: i7-4770k (LM modded) - MB: GA-Z87X-UD3H - RAM: HyperX, 16GB 1866MHz - GPU: Palit GTX 980Ti Super - Storage: 1TB HDD + 500GB/120GB SSD (850 Evo/840) - Monitor: Predator XB271HU - PSU: 700W BeQuiet 80+ Gold

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/85072-intel-vs-amd/#findComment-1157438
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

In rendering a good OC on a 8350 will bring it to the same level as a 3960x also overclocked.

 

In Gaming AMD comes *close* to Intels 4770k in most games (Margain of error), Minus skyrim, which even an Intel I3 beats the FX-8350, for some unknown reason.

 

Generally the rule of thumb is, if it uses less than 4 cores Intel would probably be faster (But more expensive), however, if it uses more than 4-6 cores (Compression, Rendering etc) AMD would normally be faster. 

CPU: Intel Core i7-4790k @ 4.7 1.3v  with a Corsair H80 w/Dual SP120s - Motherboard: MSI Z97 gaming 5 - RAM: 4x4 G.Skill Ripjaws X @ 1600 - GPU: Dual PowerColour R9 290- SSD: Samsung NVME SM951 256GB-- PSU: Corsair RM 1000  - Case: NZXT H440 Black/red - Keyboard: Coolermaster CM storm Quickfire TK, Cherry MX blues - Mouse: Logitech G502 - Heaphones: Beyerdynamic DT 770 - Monitors: 3x VE248H Eyefinity 1080P -  Phone: iPhone 6S Plus               Please post your specifications in your post, signature or even better, system page on your profile!

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/85072-intel-vs-amd/#findComment-1157458
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will encounter problems on FX series CPU's if a game is only made to use up to 4 cores.

Emulation will also be vastly superior on intel CPU's simply due to IPC, here is proof:

http://forums.pcsx2.net/Thread-CPU-Benchmark-designed-for-PCSX2-based-on-FFX-2

 

Other than that, the FX 8 series do match the Core i5's.

Le Bastardo+ 

i7 4770k + OCUK Fathom HW labs Black Ice 240 rad + Mayhem's Gigachew orange + 16GB Avexir Core Orange 2133 + Gigachew GA-Z87X-OC + 2x Gigachew WF 780Ti SLi + SoundBlaster Z + 1TB Crucial M550 + 2TB Seagate Barracude 7200rpm + LG BDR/DVDR + Superflower Leadex 1KW Platinum + NZXT Switch 810 Gun Metal + Dell U2713H + Logitech G602 + Ducky DK-9008 Shine 3 MX Brown

Red Alert

FX 8320 AMD = Noctua NHU12P = 8GB Avexir Blitz 2000 = ASUS M5A99X EVO R2.0 = Sapphire Radeon R9 290 TRI-X = 1TB Hitachi Deskstar & 500GB Hitachi Deskstar = Samsung DVDR/CDR = SuperFlower Golden Green HX 550W 80 Plus Gold = Xigmatek Utguard = AOC 22" LED 1920x1080 = Logitech G110 = SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/85072-intel-vs-amd/#findComment-1157532
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usually it's good enough to go with AMD and spend the extra cash on a better GPU. A lot of people are too obsessed with the CPU being the main power house. It's not. Of course, you'll need a proper CPU to handle that high end GPU, but way too often it's all fanboy masturbation about something that barely has any impact in most games. 

This, plus the FX's do really well in content creation.

Le Bastardo+ 

i7 4770k + OCUK Fathom HW labs Black Ice 240 rad + Mayhem's Gigachew orange + 16GB Avexir Core Orange 2133 + Gigachew GA-Z87X-OC + 2x Gigachew WF 780Ti SLi + SoundBlaster Z + 1TB Crucial M550 + 2TB Seagate Barracude 7200rpm + LG BDR/DVDR + Superflower Leadex 1KW Platinum + NZXT Switch 810 Gun Metal + Dell U2713H + Logitech G602 + Ducky DK-9008 Shine 3 MX Brown

Red Alert

FX 8320 AMD = Noctua NHU12P = 8GB Avexir Blitz 2000 = ASUS M5A99X EVO R2.0 = Sapphire Radeon R9 290 TRI-X = 1TB Hitachi Deskstar & 500GB Hitachi Deskstar = Samsung DVDR/CDR = SuperFlower Golden Green HX 550W 80 Plus Gold = Xigmatek Utguard = AOC 22" LED 1920x1080 = Logitech G110 = SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/85072-intel-vs-amd/#findComment-1157578
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fooshi has a really good point about the graphics being the main part to spend money on when it comes to gaming. It is worth nothing that although Intel does pretty much wipe the floor which most of what AMD offers, it is worth more to consider price to performance.

 

I myself use a AMD FX Bulldozer and know friends with i5's and there really isn't a big difference between the two, if there is i can't imagine its more than a few FPS at a push. If you have the budget to get a Intel CPU and a strong GPU aswell then go for it, you won't match the performance and i find used Intel gear holding their value on ebay all the time.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/85072-intel-vs-amd/#findComment-1157782
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is not just one cake in the dessert table, there are pies, bana bread cakes, Low sugar cakes, extra sugar cakes etc 

 

You even know exactly for what things are you going use your pc?

 

Intel: Gaming i5-4670k

 

AMD: Gaming FX-8350

 

Will have the SAME performance there is not going to be HUGE different 3-5fps

 

Pros:

 

AMD:

Lately you can get a cheaper Mobo for AMD's.

Since the FX-8350 is Eight Core you will have a little more room for multitasking (streaming and playing) remember 3-9 fps of difference

 

Intel: Integrated Graphics which in this case doesn't matter

 

 

Cons:

 

AMD::You will have to buy a discrete Graphics Card but since you are going to use your computer for gaming does'nt matter

Intel: Expensive Mobos

 

 

For not doing a longer reply i just recommend watch comparisons and being from a non-fanboy stand-point

 

 

if you are going to do video editing, heavy things, etc (gaming is not a heavy cpu related thing) go for the $1000 intel cpu better know as Extreme Edition

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/85072-intel-vs-amd/#findComment-1157943
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

For an in-depth comparison of Intel's & AMD's latest CPU architectures you can check out this thread : http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/48571-intel-amd-architectural-discussion-how-far-ahead-intel-really-is/

Very generally speaking AMD gives you more cores and more total performance throughput in most price points compared to Intel, while Intel gives you less cores and less total performance throughput but more performance per core and higher efficiency in most price segments.

A very rough estimate of performance puts AMD's modern six core CPUs on par with Intel's latest quad core i5 CPUs,

And eight core AMD CPUs on par with Intel's hyper-threaded quadcore i7 CPUs.

 

FX 6300 @ 3.5Ghz vs i5 4430 constant turbo on all 4 cores @ 3.0Ghz.
FX 6350 @ 3.9Ghz vs i5 4570 constant turbo on all 4 cores @ 3.4Ghz

 

Also generally speaking most games especially older ones can fully utilize up to 4 cores so in these games an Intel quadcore will outperform an AMD quadcore because of the better per core performance.
However most recent games and all future console ports will use 6 cores as standard and up to 8 cores with AMD's Mantle API.
So these games can take advantage of most or even all of the performance throughput that the AMD processors offer and thus going with an AMD six or eight core CPU makes sense.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/85072-intel-vs-amd/#findComment-1157952
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

AMD:

 

Good performance in multi-threaded programs/games.

Good if you're on a tight budget.

Great bang for the buck.

 

Intel:

 

Superb performance in terms of single threaded programs/games.

slighty better performance, only if you have a considerable amount of money to blow and will cost considerably more.

uses less power compared to amd chips.

 

Conclusion: Either company is good. If you do not have much money to spend on your build then I would go with AMD something in their FX line should be good. While on the other hand if your budget allows you to spend a large amount of money on the processor then in that case you should get a Intel processor. But do keep in mind that you are paying more money then the amount of performance you are getting out of the chip. 

 

Edit: Intel for insane work with many programs and stuff get either a I5 4570k or a I7 4770k. For Intel get either a 8350 or a 8320. And remember all of these processor are unlocked editions so I would recommend that you also pick up a Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO/Plus to better cool these chips, while at the same time you came squeeze some extra performance out of them with the use of OC! 

Wanna hang out with me and people like @Theslsamg, @ Ssoele, @BENTHEREN, @Lanoi, @Whiskers, @_ASSASSIN_, @Looney, @WunderWuffle, and @nsyedhasan. Well.... Check out: http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/48484-unofficial-linustechtips-teamschnitzel-server-teamspeak/

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/85072-intel-vs-amd/#findComment-1159718
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×