Jump to content

The community CPU gaming benchmark thread.

Aphexxis
 Share
Posted

An idea that i hope takes off. :)

 

What i am trying to do with this thread is make 1 place for CPU results to be submitted and shared, and to have a lot of user info that anyone with say a quarter of a brain cell can do. ;)

 

What i would suggest to do is download FRAPS, and use the built in FPS benchmark at the start of your run, it's proven to be awesome and reliable.

 

As a community, suggest settings that will load a CPU more than the GPU, user finding is always cool to test out.

 

This will be very hardware dependent.. not everyone owns GTX TITAN XP and cannot make 1080P res be completely CPU bound so please do bear this in mind.

 

And for the starft i will be back soon with some stock xeon results, and will overclock and see how much faster it is.

 

I will be benchmarking at 720P and low - CSGO.

 

 

I have a intel xeon cpu and a 1070 i hope this makes you salty.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/761535-the-community-cpu-gaming-benchmark-thread/
Share on other sites
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
Just now, Aphexxis said:

An idea that i hope takes off. :)

 

What i am trying to do with this thread is make 1 place for CPU results to be submitted and shared, and to have a lot of user info that anyone with say a quarter of a brain cell can do. ;)

 

What i would suggest to do is download FRAPS, and use the built in FPS benchmark at the start of your run, it's proven to be awesome and reliable.

 

As a community, suggest settings that will load a CPU more than the GPU, user finding is always cool to test out.

 

This will be very hardware dependent.. not everyone owns GTX TITAN XP and cannot make 1080P res be completely CPU bound so please do bear this in mind.

 

And for the starft i will be back soon with some stock xeon results, and will overclock and see how much faster it is.

 

I will be benchmarking at 720P and low - CSGO.

 

 

Already exists sorry

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

You would need hundreds of benchmarks, since each game favors another kind of CPU/GPU combo. And you did your test with your settings. I don't give a f*ck about CS:GO, and I couldn't care less about those tests. The games I play are indi or old games, which most people never heard of. (too indi or too old for you youngsters)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
2 minutes ago, deXxterlab97 said:

Frame rate

Well yeah, but why? What does this data help with? Or rather, what is the hypothesis here for gathering data?

 

I mean it's kind of a given better CPU = better gaming performance.

I have a blog! And a list of guides I've posted

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

Xeon E5640 2.66ghz, DDR3 @ rated spec 1066mhz

First result. CSGO 720P lowest settings, no AA, 4x AF, multicore render enabled, HTRF sound enabled.

 

Bot match casual on Nuke, playing as T, only pistol round with Deagle.

 

Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
  8890,     54679,  86, 233, 162.585

 

Xeon E5640 4.2ghz DDR3 way above spec @ 1980mhz

 

 

Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
 18127,     63274, 142, 477, 286.484
 

 

So much for GPU bound. :P


 

 

 

I have a intel xeon cpu and a 1070 i hope this makes you salty.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
21 minutes ago, deXxterlab97 said:

Because gaming mostly relies on GPU than CPU

This is a really annoying comment.  Most of us here on the forums are hardware enthusiasts and gamers.  Gamers buy CPUs and we need data to make informed decisions.  

 

 

i7 4790k @4.7 | GTX 1070 Strix | Z97 Sabertooth | 32GB  DDR3 2400 mhz | Intel 750 SSD | Define R5 | Corsair K70 | Steel Series Rival | XB271, 1440p, IPS, 165hz | 5.1 Surround
PC Build

Desk Build

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
Just now, deXxterlab97 said:

Yes, CS GO is a super competetive esport, ever pixel and frame rate matters. The game is super intense that can feel the difference between 131 fps and 130 fps

Bruh at stock the framerate drop to 80-120 was really felt, huge input lag.. not even a joke.

I have a intel xeon cpu and a 1070 i hope this makes you salty.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
7 minutes ago, CostcoSamples said:

This is a really annoying comment.  Most of us here on the forums are hardware enthusiasts and gamers.  Gamers buy CPUs and we need data to make informed decisions. 

But how granular do you want to go? Most of the hive mind here basically accepts that modern quad-cores are the minimum entry level to "high-end" performance and eight-threads is effectively the stopping point now for diminishing returns.

 

In fact, high-end benchmarks are boring. I'd rather have data on parts below the Core i5 level.

I have a blog! And a list of guides I've posted

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author
5 minutes ago, M.Yurizaki said:

But how granular do you want to go? Most of the hive mind here basically accepts that modern quad-cores are the minimum entry level to "high-end" performance and eight-threads is effectively the stopping point now for diminishing returns.

 

In fact, high-end benchmarks are boring. I'd rather have data on parts below the Core i5 level.

I want to see some Core 2 Quad, A10 7800K's... :D

I have a intel xeon cpu and a 1070 i hope this makes you salty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing CPUs, Motherboards, and Memory

×