Error? Is anyone else having this issue?

[danielsuarez369]

I recently did a VR Performance test... I was expecting to get a "Ready" reading, Or at the very least "Capable" But, To my surprise, I got "Not ready"  Which is a true surprise, Because some people with a 960m got "Ready", And i have a 965m. Can someone please explain this? Is it because i'm in windows 8.1? I had nothing running in the background, And i checked task manager, Nothing really meaningful. 

[KemoKa]

I'm just gonna throw it out there that in terms of the overall market, the 965m is not what you'd call a GPU that is "ready" for VR. I find it stranger that a 960M came even close to qualifying, let alone being capable.

[justminefall]

Dude im pretty sure that your results are correct. the 965m is a good! but it's not that good... 

[vanished]

9 minutes ago, danielsuarez369 said:

I recently did a VR Performance test... I was expecting to get a "Ready" reading, Or at the very least "Capable" But, To my surprise, I got "Not ready"  Which is a true surprise, Because some people with a 960m got "Ready", And i have a 965m. Can someone please explain this? Is it because i'm in windows 8.1? I had nothing running in the background, And i checked task manager, Nothing really meaningful. 

 

Don't you love how Valve rubs salt in the wound by knowing full-well that you have a laptop and just blindly suggests upgrading the GPU anyway?

[danielsuarez369]

Just now, Ryan_Vickers said:

Don't you love how Valve rubs salt in the wound by knowing full-well that you have a laptop and just blindly suggests upgrading the GPU anyway?

I know right

[danielsuarez369]

12 minutes ago, justminefall said:

Dude im pretty sure that your results are correct. the 965m is a good! but it's not that good... 

 

[danielsuarez369]

Any theories? Anyone?