Rainbow Six: Siege

[NoobPCUser]

I'm planning on playing rainbow six siege as my main game. I do play BF4 and am planning to get Fallout 4 soon. Will these specs be able to run these games on ultra 60fps or above?

 

 

 

 

 

 

MSI Gtx 970 4gb

 

8 gb ram

 

amd fx 8320

 

m5a97 le r2.0 mobo

 

 

TY for help. I can provide more info if needed.

[thatguyyouknow75]

What resolution? If 1080p you should be good

[NoobPCUser]

What resolution? If 1080p you should be good

yes, 1080p and thank you. 

[MourningSouls]

My system averages me about 100 FPS with these settings.

 

So I'd expect 60 would be possible for you.

[NoobPCUser]

My system averages me about 100 FPS with these settings.

 

So I'd expect 60 would be possible for you.

That's awesome thank you. Is your processor oc? I have watercooling and I will probably oc mine.

[MourningSouls]

That's awesome thank you. Is your processor oc? I have watercooling and I will probably oc mine.

Nope, locked.

[NoobPCUser]

Nope, locked.

So that would be even more performance. ty. 

[Presmo]

I'm planning on playing rainbow six siege as my main game. I do play BF4 and am planning to get Fallout 4 soon. Will these specs be able to run these games on ultra 60fps or above?

 

 

 

 

 

 

MSI Gtx 970 4gb

 

8 gb ram

 

amd fx 8320

 

m5a97 le r2.0 mobo

 

 

TY for help. I can provide more info if needed.

I'm just here praying that my gtx 750 would run it, then again it runs Just Cause 3...

[NoobPCUser]

Nope, locked.

Do you think the 8350 would provide a significant improvement?

[MourningSouls]

Do you think the 8350 would provide a significant improvement?

An improvement? Probably.

A significant improvement? Don't know.

 

This isn't really an area I have all that much knowledge in, I'm more interested in cooling and cases. That said, based on the last price I recall seeing an 8350 at, I wouldn't recommend the upgrade unless it was super cheap or free.

[angrymoose]

You system won't handle Fallout 4 on ultra @ 60fps. It'll dip down to 35ish occasionally. It would still be fine.

[NoobPCUser]

You system won't handle Fallout 4 on ultra @ 60fps. It'll dip down to 35ish occasionally. It would still be fine.

I can't stand anything under 60. If I turn god rays down will I get 60 constant?

[angrymoose]

It'll probably require more than just God rays down. Fallout 4 is just really poorly optimized.

[NoobPCUser]

It'll probably require more than just God rays down. Fallout 4 is just really poorly optimized.

Oh ok, I always have a mindset that new games are made where like you can't play it ultra without 3 titan x. It's good to know it's just poorly optimized... kinda. ty. Do you think this setup will last 2016?

[Hiebly]

Oh ok, I always have a mindset that new games are made where like you can't play it ultra without 3 titan x. It's good to know it's just poorly optimized... kinda. ty. Do you think this setup will last 2016?

 

An i5 is probably a better way to go if it's in the budget, especially if you're interested in Fallout 4. Most DX9, DX10 and DX11 games run better on Intel CPUs... the margin depends on the particular game. Witcher 3 runs pretty well on AMD CPUs, GTA V and Battlefield run better on Intel CPUs just for some examples.

 

For fallout 4 in particular GamersNexus did some CPU benchmarks:

 

 

As you can see even at 5GHz the AMD CPU gets lower FPS than the 3.5GHz i5 in Fallout 4.

[ITS-PARTY-TIME]

great on 144hz monitor when your getting 90+ fps on RSS max 1080p

[Hiebly]

Also if you are going to get an AMD FX-8 CPU, you may want a better motherboard. The M5A97 LE isn't suited to big OCs on the 8 cores AFAIK.