Graphics card joke

[YT2002]

Just reading someone's comment on facebook about them having a GTX 970. Someone else responded, "Great card, I rate 3.5/4

[OfficialJsP]

Cool.... its a bit old now do you not think also people need to realise that it still has 4GB of RAM.

[PlayStation 2]

52/52

 

 

or should I say 45.5/52

[MacAlisterL]

What is funny?

[Patrick Bateman]

old joke

[byalexandr]

I R8 the 390 8/8

[kicker2222]

Want to hear a joke...... AMD

[Patrick Bateman]

i rate crimson

20/100 

[byalexandr]

What is funny?

The GTX 970 has 3.5GB of full speed memory and .5 GB of much slower almost unusable memory. So it's 3.5GB/4GB. 3.5/4.

[Patrick Bateman]

The GTX 970 has 3.5GB of full speed memory and .5 GB of much slower almost unusable memory. So it's 3.5GB/4GB. 3.5/4.

not really.. i use over 3.5gb in some games and it runs fine still.. no stutter  and framerates were still good

[byalexandr]

i rate crimson

20/100 

ayy lmao

 

Except they fixed it unlike Nvidia.

[byalexandr]

not really.. i use over 3.5gb in some games and it runs fine still.. no stutter 

Just depends. I don't see it as that big of an issue but I prefer the 390 simply because I have a soft spot for AMD and it's a faster card.

[Patrick Bateman]

ayy lmao

 

Except they fixed it unlike Nvidia.

well how come i can use over 3.5gb and no stutter ?

[Patrick Bateman]

Just depends. I don't see it as that big of an issue but I prefer the 390 simply because I have a soft spot for AMD and it's a faster card.

have fun with shitty drivers, and AMD gimping your card like with crimson. 

[byalexandr]

well how come i can use over 3.5gb and no stutter ?

Like I said it depends on the situation. Some games can handle it better than others, but I say it's still better to have way more than enough VRAM in the first place.

[MacAlisterL]

The GTX 970 has 3.5GB of full speed memory and .5 GB of much slower almost unusable memory. So it's 3.5GB/4GB. 3.5/4.

Oh yah i forgot about the weird choise of 3.5gb

[byalexandr]

have fun with shitty drivers, and AMD gimping your card like with crimson. 

Actually, if you were correct, most if not all AMD cards have been getting performance increases not only because of the improved drivers, but also because of the dank new tech that AMD is giving us, plus there is still a lot of room to improve. My 290 actually performs the same or better than a 970, and the Fury X can now, stock clocks to stock clocks, compete with or surpass a GTX 980 Ti. Of course there were some minor issues, which AMD is working to solve, but don't act like Nvidia has no problems whatsoever.

 

I don't want to get into any more arguments over AMD vs. Nvidia, I like both but prefer AMD and I'll leave it at that.

[just-cause999]

nah, titan x 12/12

[jjohnthedon1]

Actually, if you were correct, most if not all AMD cards have been getting performance increases not only because of the improved drivers, but also because of the dank new tech that AMD is giving us, plus there is still a lot of room to improve. My 290 actually performs the same or better than a 970, and the Fury X can now, stock clocks to stock clocks, compete with or surpass a GTX 980 Ti. Of course there were some minor issues, which AMD is working to solve, but don't act like Nvidia has no problems whatsoever.

I don't want to get into any more arguments over AMD vs. Nvidia, I like both but prefer AMD and I'll leave it at that.

When u run a 980ti out of the box gpu boot 2.0 takes all of the 980tis way past 1000mhz

So there's no point in comparing that

[byalexandr]

When u run a 980ti out of the box gpu boot 2.0 takes all of the 980tis way past 1000mhz

So there's no point in comparing that

The PowerTune software overclocks the Fury X as well. I'm saying the Fury X competes with or surpasses a 980 Ti with no manual overclocking. I understand GPUBoost takes the card to higher clocks but the Fury X will still compete with it. It's not until you manually add more overclock to the card that it takes the lead.

[MMKing]

I rate the Asus Direct CU 3 cooler

3/5

[jjohnthedon1]

The PowerTune software overclocks the Fury X as well. I'm saying the Fury X competes with or surpasses a 980 Ti with no manual overclocking. I understand GPUBoost takes the card to higher clocks but the Fury X will still compete with it. It's not until you manually add more overclock to the card that it takes the lead.

Well mine clock to 1420mhz on gpu boost

U telling me the fury X is keeping up with that ?

[byalexandr]

Well mine clock to 1420mhz on gpu boost

U telling me the fury X is keeping up with that ?

I mean the reference card GPU Boost situation. Reference to reference like I said, not aftermarket like your MSI card. And it should easily beat the reference the higher the resolution gets.