Jump to content

Help making a gaming pc

INeedHelpPlox
 Share
Posted
  • Author

270, 270x, 280, and 285.  Most likely.

i just think i shouldnt spend so much on a gpu if im not gonna need all the power it has to offer >.<

I'll just be running roblox  and warframe maybe some others...but would the i5 4460 preform well for videos with a gtx 750 ti? or should i go for a cheaper cpu? maybe back to the amd side since i dont need all the extra features cause on some videos & sites like

says it could run battlefield but then again battlefield does require cores 

where as roblox only requires 1 or 2 and the comparasions of the cpus amd fx 6300 and i5 are similar on http://cpuboss.com/cpus/Intel-Core-i5-4460-vs-AMD-FX-6300 so its not really worth the extra 80$

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

heh well i want to keep it around a 600$ point

 

Your best bet is to do the build I showed you with the mouse an all if you want 60fps.  The 750ti just won't hit that without res dropping.  280x is your best option honestly.  You could do a pentium G2358 in place.  But, it depends on the games you are playing.  BF3 and 4 run better on a 280x than a 750ti just saying, and the FX and 750ti aren't going to hit 60FPS.  What is your exact budget?

But i really want to try out  the amd fx 6300 and maybe a more deticated gpu for a lil more but i'm not trying to spend alot ;-;

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted

lets say i get the amd fx 6300 i already run games around 25 fps with my shitty outdated laptop how good will the preformance boost to 60 fps?

wait... OH I SEE, that's why you said you had a bad experience with an i3, A mobile processor, probably running off integrated graphics.

 

Desktop processors an entirely are an entirely different ball game.

 

on another note, if you got the FX-6300, yes you would have an FPS increase over the laptop, but only because the burden of rendering the scene would be moved off the CPU and onto a GPU.

 

However, AMD CPU's hit multiple dead-ends rather quickly. they can bottleneck graphics cards above a 280X/960. and they are running off an old socket that has no real upgrade path. Intel, by contrast, can take you all the way from a lowly Pentiums, all the way up to i7s on a single socket. and most of them are fast enough to not bottleneck the graphics card severly

Aftermarket 980Ti >= Fury X >= Reference 980Ti > Fury > 980 > 390X > 390 >= 970 > 380X > 380 >= 960 > 950 >= 370 > 750Ti = 360

"The Orange Box" || CPU: i5 4690k || RAM: Kingston Hyper X Fury 16GB || Case: Aerocool DS200 (Orange) || Cooler: Cryorig R1 Ultimate || Storage: Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB + WD Black 1TB || PSU: Corsair RM750 || Mobo: ASUS Z97-A || GPU: EVGA GTX 970 FTW+

"Unnamed Form Factor Switch" || CPU: i7 6700K || RAM: Kingston HyperX Fury 16GB || Case: Phanteks Enthoo Evolv Mini ITX (White) || Cooler: Cryorig R1 Ultimate (Green Cover) || Storage: Samsung 850 Evo 1TB || PSU: XFX XTR 550W || Mobo: ASUS Z170I Pro Gaming || GPU: EVGA GTX 970 FTW+

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

wait... OH I SEE, that's why you said you had a bad experience with an i3, A mobile processor, probably running off integrated graphics.

 

Desktop processors an entirely are an entirely different ball game.

 

on another note, if you got the FX-6300, yes you would have an FPS increase over the laptop, but only because the burden of rendering the scene would be moved off the CPU and onto a GPU.

 

However, AMD CPU's hit multiple dead-ends rather quickly. they can bottleneck graphics cards above a 280X/960. and they are running off an old socket that has no real upgrade path. Intel, by contrast, can take you all the way from a lowly Pentiums, all the way up to i7s on a single socket. and most of them are fast enough to not bottleneck the graphics card severly

 

hm i dont think i would even want to spend 230$ on the 960 xD 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

I like your build alot

 

 

 
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2H Micro ATX LGA1150 Motherboard  ($49.99 @ SuperBiiz) 
Video Card: Asus Radeon R9 270X 2GB DirectCU II Video Card  ($142.99 @ Newegg) 
Case: Corsair 100R ATX Mid Tower Case  ($39.99 @ Micro Center) 
Total: $577.99
Prices include shipping, taxes, and discounts when available
Generated by PCPartPicker 2015-07-22 04:24 EDT-0400

 

The case never heard of it but i saw a video and was suprised by its features i think i might like it more than others

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

That really depends on the location, but since they probably got caught they probably stopped.  Could pitch a lil more in if concerned about it from newegg or amazon instead.

I'm okay with getting the case from them since it's easy to know if its used or not

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted
  • Author

That really depends on the location, but since they probably got caught they probably stopped.  Could pitch a lil more in if concerned about it from newegg or amazon instead.

But i might go to amazon and see if they have warranties and returns for a long time because new eggs only last 7 days i think 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing New Builds and Planning

×