Jump to content

Hello!
 

I am running a 480mm liquid cooling loop with the CPU and GPU in it. My temps are well under max. 

 

Now just to be clear, I am not going for low ocs. This system is used for ~7 hours a day. The oc's will be about 4.7Ghz to 5.1 GHz. 

 

Now, when I stress test, I usually use both these softwares. But, with the AIDA64 test, I can usually get 0.1ghz higher stable. P95 rejects it earlier.

 

Which software should I trust more?

AIDA64 shows stability at lower clocks while OCCT and P95 deny it

Lets all ripperoni in pepperoni

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/392733-amd-cpu-overclocking-testing-aida64-vs-p95/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

I prefer aida64

Spoiler

 

LTT's Fastest single core CineBench 11.5/15 score on air with i7-4790K on air

Main Rig

CPU: i7-4770K @ 4.3GHz 1.18v, Cooler: Noctua NH-U14S, Motherboard: Asus Sabertooth Mark 2, RAM: 16 GB G.Skill Sniper Series @ 1866MHz, GPU: EVGA 980Ti Classified @ 1507/1977MHz , Storage: 500GB 850 EVO, WD Cavier Black/Blue 1TB+1TB,  Power Supply: Corsair HX 750W, Case: Fractal Design r4 Black Pearl w/ Window, OS: Windows 10 Home 64bit

 

Plex Server WIP

CPU: i5-3570K, Cooler: Stock, Motherboard: ASrock, Ram: 16GB, GPU: Intel igpu, Storage: 120GB Kingston SSD, 6TB WD Red, Powersupply: Corsair TX 750W, Case: Corsair Carbide Spec-01 OS: Windows 10

 

Lenovo Legion Laptop

CPU: i7-7700HQ, RAM: 8GB, GPU: 1050Ti 4GB, Storage: 500GB Crucial MX500, OS: Windows 10

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd test with everything (Don't use auto voltage and stress test) and if anything you test with crashes because of your overclock, consider it unstable. I use Aida+Prime95+Cinebench then go play some GTA V

Nude Fist 1: i5-4590-ASRock h97 Anniversary-16gb Samsung 1333mhz-MSI GTX 970-Corsair 300r-Seagate HDD(s)-EVGA SuperNOVA 750b2

Name comes from anagramed sticker for "TUF Inside" (A sticker that came with my original ASUS motherboard)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello!

 

I am running a 480mm liquid cooling loop with the CPU and GPU in it. My temps are well under max. 

 

Now just to be clear, I am not going for low ocs. This system is used for ~7 hours a day. The oc's will be about 4.7Ghz to 5.1 GHz. 

 

Now, when I stress test, I usually use both these softwares. But, with the AIDA64 test, I can usually get 0.1ghz higher stable. P95 rejects it earlier.

 

Which software should I trust more?

AIDA64 shows stability at lower clocks while OCCT and P95 deny it

Dont use P95 it puts way more stress on ur system than any real world app will put on it.

I use cinibench r 15 for all my stress testing + doing some gaming + intel XTU for the i5 intel burn test is about = to cinibench

If cinibench passes the test then its probably stable. If u use P95 u will probably put .05-.15v more into ur CPU than u need to.

Laptop: Thinkpad W520 i7 2720QM 24GB RAM 1920x1080 2x SSDs Main Rig: 4790k 12GB Hyperx Beast Zotac 980ti AMP! Fractal Define S (window) RM850 Noctua NH-D15 EVGA Z97 FTW with 3 1080P 144hz monitors from Asus Secondary: i5 6600K, R9 390 STRIX, 16GB DDR4, Acer Predator 144Hz 1440P

As Centos 7 SU once said: With great power comes great responsibility.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont use P95 it puts way more stress on ur system than any real world app will put on it.

I use cinibench r 15 for all my stress testing + doing some gaming

If cinibench passes the test then its probably stable. If u use P95 u will probably put .05-.15v more into ur CPU than u need to.

It only puts extra voltage into your CPU if you're using auto/offset voltage. That's why you're supposed to stress test with a fixed voltage limit

Nude Fist 1: i5-4590-ASRock h97 Anniversary-16gb Samsung 1333mhz-MSI GTX 970-Corsair 300r-Seagate HDD(s)-EVGA SuperNOVA 750b2

Name comes from anagramed sticker for "TUF Inside" (A sticker that came with my original ASUS motherboard)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It only puts extra voltage into your CPU if you're using auto/offset voltage. That's why you're supposed to stress test with a fixed voltage limit

DUH i use fixed voltage but i mean using P95 will lock up systems where cinebench etc doesent thus if you only use P95 more voltage will be needed to make P95 happy.

Laptop: Thinkpad W520 i7 2720QM 24GB RAM 1920x1080 2x SSDs Main Rig: 4790k 12GB Hyperx Beast Zotac 980ti AMP! Fractal Define S (window) RM850 Noctua NH-D15 EVGA Z97 FTW with 3 1080P 144hz monitors from Asus Secondary: i5 6600K, R9 390 STRIX, 16GB DDR4, Acer Predator 144Hz 1440P

As Centos 7 SU once said: With great power comes great responsibility.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DUH i use fixed voltage but i mean using P95 will lock up systems where cinebench etc doesent thus if you only use P95 more voltage will be needed to make P95 happy.

Oh... yeah that makes sense :D I wasn't thinking of it that way. I can finish cinebench/Aida64 without a problem then get into GTA V and after an hour get a bluescreen

Nude Fist 1: i5-4590-ASRock h97 Anniversary-16gb Samsung 1333mhz-MSI GTX 970-Corsair 300r-Seagate HDD(s)-EVGA SuperNOVA 750b2

Name comes from anagramed sticker for "TUF Inside" (A sticker that came with my original ASUS motherboard)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh... yeah that makes sense :D I wasn't thinking of it that way. I can finish cinebench/Aida64 without a problem then get into GTA V and after an hour get a bluescreen

On my i5 intel burn test and intel XTU will put the i5 at 65C but gaming only puts it in the 60s whereas P95 hit 88 and then it shut off so i no longer use P95

 

EDIT: running intel XTU stress test only at 61C tops so P95 is ALOT more intensive i guess..

Laptop: Thinkpad W520 i7 2720QM 24GB RAM 1920x1080 2x SSDs Main Rig: 4790k 12GB Hyperx Beast Zotac 980ti AMP! Fractal Define S (window) RM850 Noctua NH-D15 EVGA Z97 FTW with 3 1080P 144hz monitors from Asus Secondary: i5 6600K, R9 390 STRIX, 16GB DDR4, Acer Predator 144Hz 1440P

As Centos 7 SU once said: With great power comes great responsibility.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello!

 

I am running a 480mm liquid cooling loop with the CPU and GPU in it. My temps are well under max. 

 

Now just to be clear, I am not going for low ocs. This system is used for ~7 hours a day. The oc's will be about 4.7Ghz to 5.1 GHz. 

 

Now, when I stress test, I usually use both these softwares. But, with the AIDA64 test, I can usually get 0.1ghz higher stable. P95 rejects it earlier.

 

Which software should I trust more?

AIDA64 shows stability at lower clocks while OCCT and P95 deny it

AIDA64.

QUOTE ME OR I PROBABLY WON'T SEE YOUR RESPONSE 

My Setup:

 

Desktop

Spoiler

CPU: Ryzen 9 3900X  CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15  Motherboard: Asus Prime X370-PRO  RAM: 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 @3200MHz  GPU: EVGA RTX 2080 FTW3 ULTRA (+50 core +400 memory)  Storage: 1050GB Crucial MX300, 1TB Crucial MX500  PSU: EVGA Supernova 750 P2  Chassis: NZXT Noctis 450 White/Blue OS: Windows 10 Professional  Displays: Asus MG279Q FreeSync OC, LG 27GL850-B

 

Main Laptop:

Spoiler

Laptop: Sager NP 8678-S  CPU: Intel Core i7 6820HK @ 2.7GHz  RAM: 32GB DDR4 @ 2133MHz  GPU: GTX 980m 8GB  Storage: 250GB Samsung 850 EVO M.2 + 1TB Samsung 850 Pro + 1TB 7200RPM HGST HDD  OS: Windows 10 Pro  Chassis: Clevo P670RG  Audio: HyperX Cloud II Gunmetal, Audio Technica ATH-M50s, JBL Creature II

 

Thinkpad T420:

Spoiler

CPU: i5 2520M  RAM: 8GB DDR3  Storage: 275GB Crucial MX30

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

how high is your voltage OP?

My FX 8320 ran 4.7 GHz at 1.47 or so Volt, but summer temps came, and i had to turn it down to 4.52GHz at around 1.4350V

Now the 8350, if you are using that CPU listed in your signature, is just a better binner 8320, so you should be able to get lower voltages then me and remain stable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×