Jump to content

Reviewing Locked CPU's

          I've seen Linus look at the extremeties of Intel's CPU's from the i7 5960x to the Pentium G3258. He even took a look at the more feasible i7 4790k. Yet, I never see anyone review CPU's such as the i7 4790s or i7 4790t, which seems to have better single-core performance when at maximum turbo-boost. These alternatives are actually locked, so it takes a lot more work to overclock them. Yet, I'm wondering if that downside is enough to make the unlocked version a better alternative. Any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both the 4790S and 4790T are slightly worse than the 4790K in terms of single core performance at turbo boost. They also do not overclock well, usually mustering up a mere 100MHz-200MHz while the 4790Ks tend to overclock far better (my chip hits 4.7GHz at 1.325V.)

Main Rig: CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | RAM: 32GB (2x16GB) KLEVV CRAS XR RGB DDR4-3600 | Motherboard: Gigabyte B550I AORUS PRO AX | Storage: 512GB SKHynix PC401, 1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus, 2x Micron 1100 256GB SATA SSDs | GPU: EVGA RTX 3080 FTW3 Ultra 10GB | Cooling: ThermalTake Floe 280mm w/ be quiet! Pure Wings 3 | Case: Sliger SM580 (Black) | PSU: Lian Li SP 850W

 

Server: CPU: AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | RAM: 32GB (2x16GB) Crucial DDR4 Pro | Motherboard: ASUS PRIME B550-PLUS AC-HES | Storage: 128GB Samsung PM961, 4TB Seagate IronWolf | GPU: AMD FirePro WX 3100 | Cooling: EK-AIO Elite 360 D-RGB | Case: Corsair 5000D Airflow (White) | PSU: Seasonic Focus GM-850

 

Miscellaneous: Dell Optiplex 7060 Micro (i5-8500T/16GB/512GB), Lenovo ThinkCentre M715q Tiny (R5 2400GE/16GB/256GB), Dell Optiplex 7040 SFF (i5-6400/8GB/128GB)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Haswell Hyperthreaded quadcore at 4 Ghz will perform exactly the same as a Haswell Hyperthreaded quadcore at 4 Ghz.. Look at any benchmark that includes non-OC'd numbers for the 4790K, and you'll be able to extrapolate what the 4790, 4790S, and 4790T will do (within a reasonable margin)..

 

Don't get me wrong, locked CPUs are still relevant to consumers (mainly the low-power variants, to people who need a low-power but still high performance CPU), but they're not really worth individually benchmarking because the numbers just won't be that different..

i7 not perfectly stable at 4.4.. #firstworldproblems

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't get me wrong, locked CPUs are still relevant to consumers (mainly the low-power variants, to people who need a low-power but still high performance CPU), but they're not really worth individually benchmarking because the numbers just won't be that different..

Agree on this. Linus usually does give stock and OCed score, so for lockedone just give attention for the stock score and it will be in the margin of error the same score if he did test locked CPU.

 

On the other hand - a lot of locked CPUs are quite good at OCing, even without unlocked multiplier. I am running i7 2600 non-K OCed to 4,2 Ghz.

Intel i7 2600 @ 4.2 Ghz | MSI Z77-GD55 | Crucial 16 GB DDR3 RAM 1600Mhz | Intel 330 SSD 180Gb | Western Digital Black 1Tb | Western Digital Green 2Tb | Gigabyte GTX 650 Ti | OCZ ModXStream Pro 500W | Thermaltake Commander MS-I case | OS X Yosemite | Dell Vostro 3550 Windows 10

Intel Xeon 1230 V2 | Gigabyte GA-H61M-S | Kingston 4Gb RAM 1333Mhz | Seagate 1TB  | Fractial Design Arc mini | Windows 10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well, has anyone tried overclocking these two CPU's or benchmarking it? Any videos?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×