Core i5 Multicore performance

[QuadNine]

So I am pretty set on getting the core i5 4690k, I just wanted to know how well would it perform in multi core tasks such as video encoding, and rendering, and such, compared to the 8350? Also in the future I want to upgrade to the 4790k so how does that compare also?

[Fate]

4690k is ~<10% slower in rendering and whatnot I believe. 

4790k destroys the 8350 in rendering.

[thekeemo]

never mind I read it wrong

[i_build_nanosuits]

yes they are pretty close...here look at LTT cinebench results it will give you a great idea on multi-threaded performance:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlC81MjwelBgdEZNV3l6aHl1eUNwSUR4Rml0MXMzN1E&usp=sharing#gid=0

 

as you can see an overclocked FX render slightly faster than an overclocked i5 but the amazaingly stronger intel cores will far outwheight this slight disavantage in most cases especially in regards to gaming.

[c0d0ps]

this tells you everything

 

"Everything" ??

It doesn't even mention a single i5.

Unless you already know how the i5 would perform it doesn't really help which much.

[xox]

In terms of relative performance, I think the 8350 is better in terms of video rendering etc.

 

However, my 3570k (two generations old now) is still better than 99% of what most other people that I've talked to have seen.

 

It's only when the videos get longer that you will really feel the benefit of the more powerful processors.

[i_build_nanosuits]

In terms of relative performance, I think the 8350 is better in terms of video rendering etc.

 

However, my 3570k (two generations old now) is still better than 99% of what most other people that I've talked to have seen.

 

It's only when the videos get longer that you will really feel the benefit of the more powerful processors.

3570k is only one generation old...it's ivy bridge.

[thekeemo]

"Everything" ??

It doesn't even mention a single i5.

Unless you already know how the i5 would perform it doesn't really help which much.

the first reply tripped me up

sorry about that

this tells you everything

[i_build_nanosuits]

the first reply tripped me up

sorry about that

this tells you everything

no, this tell you everything:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlC81MjwelBgdEZNV3l6aHl1eUNwSUR4Rml0MXMzN1E&usp=sharing#gid=0

[Majestic]

http://anandtech.com/bench/product/697?vs=1261

 

Intel Core i5 wins/ties in 46/53 tests. Only a few occasions where the 8350 edges out, but only by a bit.

Where the intel wins, it usually beats it pretty severely.

[xox]

3570k is only one generation old...it's ivy bridge.

Haswell Refresh was technically a generation, according to Intel anyway (or at least for the point of my post)

[c0d0ps]

the first reply tripped me up

sorry about that

this tells you everything

 

Oh, ok.

This one is pretty good

[thekeemo]

no, this tell you everything:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlC81MjwelBgdEZNV3l6aHl1eUNwSUR4Rml0MXMzN1E&usp=sharing#gid=0

cinebench isnt everything

also how do I get my name on there?

[i_build_nanosuits]

Haswell Refresh was technically a generation, according to Intel anyway (or at least for the point of my post)

no it's not it's the same architecture...the cpu support the same instruction sets and appart from the thermal interface material and 2 added capacitor to increase stability nothing has changed.

broadwell will be the next generation cpu's.

[i_build_nanosuits]

cinebench isnt everything

also how do I get my name on there?

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/62476-post-your-cinebench-r15r1152003-scores-over-250-submissions/

and yes cinebench is the best to tell on mutli-threaded performance its a full on rendering benchmark...nothing better actualy exist

[thekeemo]

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/62476-post-your-cinebench-r15r1152003-scores-over-250-submissions/

and yes cinebench is the best to tell on mutli-threaded performance its a full on rendering benchmark...nothing better actualy exist

besides actual rendering,,,,

[i_build_nanosuits]

besides actual rendering,,,,

well..it is actual rendering...try it out and see for yourself!

here's what it looks like...it does render from the CPU directly...

[Jumper118]

i would say you need to run an 8350 at 4.8ghz+ to safely beat the average i5 4690k.

[Majestic]

i would say you need to run an 8350 at 4.8ghz+ to safely beat the average i5 4690k.

 

With what exactly?

[i_build_nanosuits]

i would say you need to run an 8350 at 4.8ghz+ to safely beat the average i5 4690k.

correct...and here is cinebench single-threaded results...this is laughable as a core 2 duo takes the lead over the best FX results at 5.35ghz...yes sir!

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlC81MjwelBgdEZNV3l6aHl1eUNwSUR4Rml0MXMzN1E&usp=sharing#gid=1

 

a big hurrah to ryan leech!

[Jumper118]

With what exactly?

anything multithreaded.

correct...and here is cinebench single-threaded results...this is laughable as a core 2 duo takes the lead over the best FX results at 5.35ghz...yes sir!

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlC81MjwelBgdEZNV3l6aHl1eUNwSUR4Rml0MXMzN1E&usp=sharing#gid=1

 

a big hurrah to ryan leech!

yes i know. i update the spreadsheet

[Majestic]

well..it is actual rendering...try it out and see for yourself!

here's what it looks like...it does render from the CPU directly...

 

I got 8.00 on my 4670K...

http://i.imgur.com/i2BRgDv.jpg

 

That means even a 4.8ghz FX8350 is slower in multithreading +)