single core score

[C0d3dSk1llS]

Is this a good score? r20, running 4.9 ghz

[RONOTHAN##]

For stock operation, that's about in line with what I'd expect for (I'm guessing) R20.

 

For overclocked (like you should do with a 10900X), it's pretty bad, that chip should be doing somewhere closer to 4.5-4.8GHz depending on your motherboard, CPU quality, and cooler.

[C0d3dSk1llS]

im overclocked to 4.9 actually, i dont know why it only says 3.7. Unless cinebench only uses stock cpu speed.

 

[RONOTHAN##]

4 minutes ago, JimmyBlaize said:

im overclocked to 4.9 actually, i dont know why it only says 3.7

 

Are you sure? That's about where the CPU should be scoring when it's at 3.7GHz, not 4.9GHz. Use something like HWiNFO64 to make sure that the chip is actually running at 4.9GHz, because I'm 95% sure it's not.

 

EDIT: Don't worry about where it says "@ 3.7 GHz", it's a pretty common bug with Cinebench, it doesn't read CPU frequency correct half the time. The score itself is the reason why I say it's running at 3.7GHz.

Edited April 15, 2022 by RONOTHAN##

[C0d3dSk1llS]

3 minutes ago, RONOTHAN## said:

Are you sure? That's about where the CPU should be scoring when it's at 3.7GHz, not 4.9GHz. Use something like HWiNFO64 to make sure that the chip is actually running at 4.9GHz, because I'm 95% sure it's not.

first pc ive ever built so i dunno, u tell me....keep in mind, i only have a crappy video card and 1 single stick of 8gb 3600

[Zando_]

2 minutes ago, JimmyBlaize said:

1 single stick of 8gb 3600

That's probably it. RAM will impact scores a bit (though I've never tried with single channel, only dual and quad channel). I wouldn't expect it to be terribly fast on single core, IIRC the mesh chips are a bit worse than their ringbus predecessors, but better in multicore loads. At least going off comparisons of the 6950X and 7900X (the 10900X is basically a tweaked 7900X AFAIK). Though you should be hitting higher than a stock 7700K given the clock lead your chip has

[RONOTHAN##]

Just now, JimmyBlaize said:

first pc ive ever built so i dunno, u tell me....

When you go to launch HWiNFO, check "Sensors only". There will be a drop down menu that says "CPU Frequency", and that will show what the CPU is currently running at. Do the R23 run and watch that clock speed, my guess is even if it is starting out at 4.9GHz it drops down to something like 4GHz or lower when it actually goes to run that workload, either thermal throttling or there's an AVX offset.

[C0d3dSk1llS]

1 minute ago, RONOTHAN## said:

When you go to launch HWiNFO, check "Sensors only". There will be a drop down menu that says "CPU Frequency", and that will show what the CPU is currently running at. Do the R23 run and watch that clock speed, my guess is even if it is starting out at 4.9GHz it drops down to something like 4GHz or lower when it actually goes to run that workload, either thermal throttling or there's an AVX offset.

I have my avx offset set because of high cpu temps under a heavy load.

[RONOTHAN##]

Just now, JimmyBlaize said:

I have my avx offset set because of high cpu temps under a heavy load.

So your CPU isn't running at 4.9GHz. How big of an AVX offset do you have?

[C0d3dSk1llS]

6 minutes ago, RONOTHAN## said:

So your CPU isn't running at 4.9GHz. How big of an AVX offset do you have?

also im using XTU, for my bios seems to have some features locked.. also the cpu speed only drops, when im running prime 95, or something with avx512. other than that it seems to remain a 4.9. I watch it drop when I run prime 95.

[RONOTHAN##]

Just now, JimmyBlaize said:

 

Well there's your problem. 

 

R23 is an AVX 512 workload, and that AVX 512 offset is massive. It's running at 3.1GHz during R23, that's why it's running so slow for an overclocked 10900X: it's not overclocked.

[C0d3dSk1llS]

2 minutes ago, RONOTHAN## said:

Well there's your problem. 

 

R23 is an AVX 512 workload, and that AVX 512 offset is massive. It's running at 3.1GHz during R23, that's why it's running so slow for an overclocked 10900X: it's not overclocked.

This is actually r20. besides how many programs actually use avx512? its basically overclocked for everything until it triggers avx, then it drops it down so the cpu dont overheat and crash, i know what im doin..

 

[RONOTHAN##]

Just now, JimmyBlaize said:

This is actually r20.

That's what I meant. R20 is AVX 512.

[C0d3dSk1llS]

9 minutes ago, RONOTHAN## said:

That's what I meant. R20 is AVX 512.

i still have some voltages to play with n such tho, It seemed to run cooler on auto, and only had my avx 512 to x10. so i dunno, in reality tho, it makes absolutly no difference, for I really dont even do anything too cpu intensive anyway , just wanted a good pc. but i still aim to get to 5.0 stable. Keep in mind, ive never built a pc or overclocked one before, so I think im doing pretty good.
Feel free to make suggestions tho. im open to try new things..im also, going to try and remount the cooler head, with some fresh paste, Its mounted with the pre applied paste and i mounted it wrong the first time so i fixed it , but used same paste, which could also be effecting temps some.