Jump to content

Encoding aspect ratio

Go to solution Solved by mariushm,

You chose the aspect ratio that works best with your actual content. In your case, probably square pixels.

 

That option is there for content that you want to be stretched in some way when viewed on the screen.

 

For example, let's say you recorded the content with one of those older HD cameras that record in 1440x1080 interlaced, and when played on TV the content is stretched to 1920x1080. In the actual video file, the pixels are horizontally squished, you get 1920 pixels squeezed into 1440 pixels.

If you want to maintain aspect ratio correct, then you'd chose HD Anamorphic 1080 (1.333)  and this is an indicator the player detects and automatically resizes the width to 1440 x 1.333 = 1920 pixels and leaves the height 1080 pixels, so you get the desired 1920x1080 pixels frame.

 

As another example, let's say you have a widescreen movie, but you want to make a NTSC DVD, where the resolution is 704x480 or 720x480.  If your widescreen movie is 16/9 that means the actual video would use only 704x396 pixels out of the 720x480 frame, leaving 84 pixels unused, black, which sucks, it's waste of space for the encoder. 

So what you could do instead is take your original master, which is 4K or better quality, and resize it down so that all 480 vertical pixels are used, or almost, and you get for example 854 x 480 frame and you can squish the image horizontally down to 704 pixels.

You encode the video as 704x480 pixels but set the aspect ratio to 1.2121   or 40:33, which tells the video player to take that 704x480 and multiply the width by 1.2121 and get to 854 x 480 pixels, the proper 16:9 image.

 

Your content is 1920x1080 and the pixels are square, you don't have to stretch the image horizontally or vertically, so no need to specify an aspect ratio. Leave it on square pixels.

 

 

Hey so I am using Adobe media encoder and I have to encode a video but I am wondering between those encoding aspect ratio options-which one is the best? I want my video to be 16:9 and have the best quality possible(which will not be much

since the source is a 1080p YouTube video) but you know I want to turn that into the best version of it possible. I am using AVI Uncompressed. Which aspect ratio do you recommend?

63800159_Screenshot8_16_20215_25_48PM.thumb.png.619f06c01a90e60460e2635227a991b6.png

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1365594-encoding-aspect-ratio/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You chose the aspect ratio that works best with your actual content. In your case, probably square pixels.

 

That option is there for content that you want to be stretched in some way when viewed on the screen.

 

For example, let's say you recorded the content with one of those older HD cameras that record in 1440x1080 interlaced, and when played on TV the content is stretched to 1920x1080. In the actual video file, the pixels are horizontally squished, you get 1920 pixels squeezed into 1440 pixels.

If you want to maintain aspect ratio correct, then you'd chose HD Anamorphic 1080 (1.333)  and this is an indicator the player detects and automatically resizes the width to 1440 x 1.333 = 1920 pixels and leaves the height 1080 pixels, so you get the desired 1920x1080 pixels frame.

 

As another example, let's say you have a widescreen movie, but you want to make a NTSC DVD, where the resolution is 704x480 or 720x480.  If your widescreen movie is 16/9 that means the actual video would use only 704x396 pixels out of the 720x480 frame, leaving 84 pixels unused, black, which sucks, it's waste of space for the encoder. 

So what you could do instead is take your original master, which is 4K or better quality, and resize it down so that all 480 vertical pixels are used, or almost, and you get for example 854 x 480 frame and you can squish the image horizontally down to 704 pixels.

You encode the video as 704x480 pixels but set the aspect ratio to 1.2121   or 40:33, which tells the video player to take that 704x480 and multiply the width by 1.2121 and get to 854 x 480 pixels, the proper 16:9 image.

 

Your content is 1920x1080 and the pixels are square, you don't have to stretch the image horizontally or vertically, so no need to specify an aspect ratio. Leave it on square pixels.

 

 

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1365594-encoding-aspect-ratio/#findComment-14934904
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, mariushm said:

You chose the aspect ratio that works best with your actual content. In your case, probably square pixels.

 

That option is there for content that you want to be stretched in some way when viewed on the screen.

 

For example, let's say you recorded the content with one of those older HD cameras that record in 1440x1080 interlaced, and when played on TV the content is stretched to 1920x1080. In the actual video file, the pixels are horizontally squished, you get 1920 pixels squeezed into 1440 pixels.

If you want to maintain aspect ratio correct, then you'd chose HD Anamorphic 1080 (1.333)  and this is an indicator the player detects and automatically resizes the width to 1440 x 1.333 = 1920 pixels and leaves the height 1080 pixels, so you get the desired 1920x1080 pixels frame.

 

As another example, let's say you have a widescreen movie, but you want to make a NTSC DVD, where the resolution is 704x480 or 720x480.  If your widescreen movie is 16/9 that means the actual video would use only 704x396 pixels out of the 720x480 frame, leaving 84 pixels unused, black, which sucks, it's waste of space for the encoder. 

So what you could do instead is take your original master, which is 4K or better quality, and resize it down so that all 480 vertical pixels are used, or almost, and you get for example 854 x 480 frame and you can squish the image horizontally down to 704 pixels.

You encode the video as 704x480 pixels but set the aspect ratio to 1.2121   or 40:33, which tells the video player to take that 704x480 and multiply the width by 1.2121 and get to 854 x 480 pixels, the proper 16:9 image.

 

Your content is 1920x1080 and the pixels are square, you don't have to stretch the image horizontally or vertically, so no need to specify an aspect ratio. Leave it on square pixels.

 

 

Thanks! That's a lot of insight on aspect ratio. I get it now you want to stretch them to fit the frame but since my content is already good to go with 1920x1080 it doesn't have to be stretched or fitted(this is only the case with special formats that you want to encode in different resolution or frame. Nice! Super useful! Thanks!

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1365594-encoding-aspect-ratio/#findComment-14934942
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×