Jump to content

So I used to play with a potato gpu then I got myself an rx 580 4gb oc armor gpu and thought that I would be able to play with decent frames but that is not the case. From what I understand my cpu could be bottlenecking the gpu and according to amd my cpu does not meet the minimum requirements for rust. I have been monitoring my gpu usage and cpu usage and I have noticed my gpu usage spikes rapidly while playing from 100 to 0 to 40 then to 100 and does all random amounts. I am not sure if this is normal and I only get about 40 to 50 frames if im lucky on the lowest settings in rust with this gpu and I play on 1280x720 resolution.

 

Specs:

 

Intel xeon e3 1245 v1
Rx 580 armor 4gb
14 gb ddr3 ram

 

I really dont mind if I can get a solid 60 to 70 and I know this card is capable of it even at 1080p. I just dont get how if it is a cpu bottleneck how my cpu is almost not used at all while playing. Any help would be much appreciated. I would also like to know if the game will have any difference in performance other than loading times if I load it on a ssd as my ssd is coming soon but I currently only have a sshd

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1323385-major-performance-problems-in-rust/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, djnjd09 said:

I think your being CPU bottlenecked but im not 100% sure. It looks like a old CPU that cant handle the game. I recommend you upgrade to an i5-10600KF or a Ryzen 5 3600.

Yeah I am planning on upgrading to a ryzen 5 3600 but to do that I obviously need a new motherboard and then new ram but sadly I do not have the money for that right now so I am just wondering if there is anything I am doing wrong or anything that may be wrong with my system that I could potentially fix in the mean time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, matty11123 said:

So I used to play with a potato gpu then I got myself an rx 580 4gb oc armor gpu and thought that I would be able to play with decent frames but that is not the case. From what I understand my cpu could be bottlenecking the gpu and according to amd my cpu does not meet the minimum requirements for rust. I have been monitoring my gpu usage and cpu usage and I have noticed my gpu usage spikes rapidly while playing from 100 to 0 to 40 then to 100 and does all random amounts. I am not sure if this is normal and I only get about 40 to 50 frames if im lucky on the lowest settings in rust with this gpu and I play on 1280x720 resolution.

 

Specs:

 

Intel xeon e3 1245 v1
Rx 580 armor 4gb
14 gb ddr3 ram

 

I really dont mind if I can get a solid 60 to 70 and I know this card is capable of it even at 1080p. I just dont get how if it is a cpu bottleneck how my cpu is almost not used at all while playing. Any help would be much appreciated. I would also like to know if the game will have any difference in performance other than loading times if I load it on a ssd as my ssd is coming soon but I currently only have a sshd

 

I remember another LTT user was reporting performance issues with Rust.

They were using a Ryzen 2700X (note, 8-core 16-thread CPU).

 

Further digging around, because Rust uses the Unity 5 engine, it only uses 2-cores (I'm assuming 2-cores 4-threads ...but don't quote me) at a single given time.

It cannot make use of the extra cores available.

 

Your Xeon E3 1245 V1 is based on the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture (i.e. Intel Core-i 2000 series)

Rust's system requirements is an Intel Core i7-3770, which is Ivy Bridge microarchitecture.

Plus, you are running a server tier CPU.

I can see why the game is saying / assuming you don't meet minimum requirements.

 

Considering the damn game can't use more cores, the only way to get more FPS, I guess, is higher IPC, and raw CPU clock speed.

Considering your Xeon is Sandy Bridge era, and with a Base Clock of 3.3 GHz, and max Turbo Boost of up to 3.7 GHz .... ehhh...

 

 

AMD Ryzen 9000 Rig

  • AMD R7 9800X3D + Alphacool CORE 1 w/ Performance Mount Kit + Thermal Grizzly AM5 Contact Frame
  • Gigabyte X870E Aorus Pro Ice
  • 32GB (16GB X2) G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6400
  • Sapphire NITRO+ 6800 XT Special Edition + EKwb Full Cover Block
  • Custom Loop w/ 2x 360mm Radiators
  • WD SN850X + WD SN750 + Samsung 980
  • EVGA P2 850W + Red/White CableMod Cables
  • Lian-Li O11 Dynamic EVO XL

AMD Ryzen 5000 Rig

  • AMD R7-5800X
  • Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro AC
  • 32GB (16GB X 2) Crucial Ballistix RGB DDR4-3600
  • Gigabyte Vision RTX 3060 Ti OC
  • EKwb D-RGB 360mm AIO
  • Intel 660p NVMe 1TB + Crucial MX500 1TB + WD Black 1TB HDD
  • EVGA P2 850W + White CableMod cables
  • Lian-Li LanCool II Mesh - White

Intel i7-8086K / Z390 Rig (Decommissioned Q2' 2025)

Intel i7-6800K / X99 Rig (Officially Decommissioned, Dead CPU returned to Intel)
Intel i5-4690K / Z97 Rig (Decommissioned)

AMD FX-8350 / 990FX Rig (Decommissioned)

AMD Phenom II X6 1090T / 890FX Rig (Decommissioned)

 

<> Electrical Engineer , B.Eng <>

<> Electronics & Computer Engineering Technologist (Diploma + Advanced Diploma) <>

<> Electronics Engineering Technician for the Canadian Department of National Defence <>

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, -rascal- said:

 

I remember another LTT user was reporting performance issues with Rust.

They were using a Ryzen 2700X (note, 8-core 16-thread CPU).

 

Further digging around, because Rust uses the Unity 5 engine, it only uses 2-cores (I'm assuming 2-cores 4-threads ...but don't quote me) at a single given time.

It cannot make use of the extra cores available.

 

Your Xeon E3 1245 V1 is based on the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture (i.e. Intel Core-i 2000 series)

Rust's system requirements is an Intel Core i7-3770, which is Ivy Bridge microarchitecture.

Plus, you are running a server tier CPU.

I can see why the game is saying / assuming you don't meet minimum requirements.

 

Considering the damn game can't use more cores, the only way to get more FPS, I guess, is higher IPC, and raw CPU clock speed.

Considering your Xeon is Sandy Bridge era, and with a Base Clock of 3.3 GHz, and max Turbo Boost of up to 3.7 GHz .... ehhh...

 

 

Ok yeah I see that the cpu may not be the best but I still dont understand why my fps is so low even on really low resolutions and how the gpu has like extremely weird usage patterns unless that has to do with the cpu bottleneck too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, matty11123 said:

Ok yeah I see that the cpu may not be the best but I still dont understand why my fps is so low even on really low resolutions and how the gpu has like extremely weird usage patterns unless that has to do with the cpu bottleneck too.

 

The lower the resolution, the LESS GPU reliant, and the CPU's performance shows even more.

So-called more "CPU dependent" at lower resolutions. 

AMD Ryzen 9000 Rig

  • AMD R7 9800X3D + Alphacool CORE 1 w/ Performance Mount Kit + Thermal Grizzly AM5 Contact Frame
  • Gigabyte X870E Aorus Pro Ice
  • 32GB (16GB X2) G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6400
  • Sapphire NITRO+ 6800 XT Special Edition + EKwb Full Cover Block
  • Custom Loop w/ 2x 360mm Radiators
  • WD SN850X + WD SN750 + Samsung 980
  • EVGA P2 850W + Red/White CableMod Cables
  • Lian-Li O11 Dynamic EVO XL

AMD Ryzen 5000 Rig

  • AMD R7-5800X
  • Gigabyte B550 Aorus Pro AC
  • 32GB (16GB X 2) Crucial Ballistix RGB DDR4-3600
  • Gigabyte Vision RTX 3060 Ti OC
  • EKwb D-RGB 360mm AIO
  • Intel 660p NVMe 1TB + Crucial MX500 1TB + WD Black 1TB HDD
  • EVGA P2 850W + White CableMod cables
  • Lian-Li LanCool II Mesh - White

Intel i7-8086K / Z390 Rig (Decommissioned Q2' 2025)

Intel i7-6800K / X99 Rig (Officially Decommissioned, Dead CPU returned to Intel)
Intel i5-4690K / Z97 Rig (Decommissioned)

AMD FX-8350 / 990FX Rig (Decommissioned)

AMD Phenom II X6 1090T / 890FX Rig (Decommissioned)

 

<> Electrical Engineer , B.Eng <>

<> Electronics & Computer Engineering Technologist (Diploma + Advanced Diploma) <>

<> Electronics Engineering Technician for the Canadian Department of National Defence <>

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, -rascal- said:

 

The lower the resolution, the LESS GPU reliant, and the CPU's performance shows even more.

So-called more "CPU dependent" at lower resolutions. 

Oh ok thank you I have tried putting it up to the max resolution of my monitor which is 1366x768 and it may be better after installing msi afterburner which is strange as I have done nothing in msi afterburner but on radeon panel. I have a slight overclock but thank you for all the help. I see now there is pretty much nothing I can do but upgrade my cpu 😞

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×