GTA V LOADING TIME

[NAVEEN KUMAR]

which affects loading time of gta v or games is it read speed of a ssd or shortage of ram or clock speed of cpu or core count???????????????????

[NAVEEN KUMAR]

1 minute ago, BlueScope819 said:

because gta online is a pile of garbage nothing to do with your pc

not online for story mode

[PlayStation 2]

GTA V just takes a long while to load for no reason and it's even worse with Online just on account of the authentication to Rockstar servers is... not fast, to say the very least.

Basically, there's nothing you can realistically do unless you have the game on a really slow hard drive. Which, in that case, putting it on a spare hard drive would help.

[NAVEEN KUMAR]

2 minutes ago, BlueScope819 said:

if you have the game installed on a slow ass hard drive it will take longer but gta in general is trash for loading times

i have wd green m.2 sata 240gb ssd read and write speed upto 500mbps

[NAVEEN KUMAR]

Just now, BlueScope819 said:

Sure but is GTA installed on it?

yes

[NAVEEN KUMAR]

3 minutes ago, BlueScope819 said:

How long are we talking for GTA loading time like is it super bad or only 5 minutes?

it is about like 1m 30s 

[NAVEEN KUMAR]

Just now, BlueScope819 said:

That's perfectly fine and to be expected.

by any way can we speed up 

[NAVEEN KUMAR]

3 minutes ago, BlueScope819 said:

1:30 is very reasonable yes you could buy a faster SSD but it wont make a big difference gta is just poorly coded in that sense

how much time reduced when i put intel optane via pcie?

[Eigenvektor]

Just now, NAVEEN KUMAR said:

how much time reduced when i put intel optane via pcie?

The fastest you can go is with an NVMe SSD and as you can see the difference to a SATA SSD is very low. Optane isn't really worth it for an SSD, this is more for speeding up HDDs.

[NAVEEN KUMAR]

26 minutes ago, Eigenvektor said:

The fastest you can go is with an NVMe SSD and as you can see the difference to a SATA SSD is very low. Optane isn't really worth it for an SSD, this is more for speeding up HDDs.

how the youtuber get 29.86 sec using ssd

 

 

The youtuber spec

 

 

Motherboard: Asus Z370-G Gaming

CPU: i7 8700K

GPU: MSI Trio X GTX 1080 Ti

RAM: 32GB DDR4 3000MHz

SSD: Crucial MX500 (Games)

NVME: Samsung 960 Evo (OS)

PSU: EVGA 750W Power Supply (Gold)

Cooler: Be Quiet Silent Loop 360

Monitor: Acer Predator XB271HU (165Hz - 1440p)

Monitor 2: Acer Predator XB271HK (60 Hz - 4K)

 

 

MY PC SPEC

 

Motherboard: Gigabyte H170M-D3H

CPU: i7 6700K (stock clock 4.0ghz, boost clock 4.2ghz)

GPU: MSI GT 730 4 GB (core clock 700mhz, mem clock 550mhz)

RAM: 8GB DDR4 2400MHz

NVME: WD GREEN M.SATA SSD 240GB read/write upto 500mbps

PSU: CORSAIR VS650

Cooler: Intel TS15A (air cooled)

Monitor: MI TV 4 55" (60Hz - 4K)

Monitor 2: LG 22M38D-B 22" (60 Hz - 1080P)

[NAVEEN KUMAR]

should i increase RAM to 32gb

or go for a 3000mhz ram????

[Eigenvektor]

Just now, NAVEEN KUMAR said:

how the youtuber get 29.86 sec using ssd

Faster CPU, faster RAM. Don't know if you have dual channel RAM, but that could also be a factor. Amount of RAM could also play a (minor) role, but 16 GB should be enough.

 

Data needs to be loaded from disk, so its speed matters, then it most likely needs to be processed by the CPU and finally placed into RAM. So the combined speed of all of these determines the load time.

 

Whether it is worth it to upgrade all of that to go from 90 seconds to 30 seconds is up to you. It's also possible the test was done with an older version of the game and some changes to the game increased load times so even with an update you might not be as fast.

[NAVEEN KUMAR]

No it is a single stick corsair vengeance 8gb ddr4 2400mhz

[Gamer Guy]

26 minutes ago, NAVEEN KUMAR said:

how the youtuber get 29.86 sec using ssd

 

The youtuber spec

NVME: Samsung 960 Evo (OS)

 

MY PC SPEC

NVME: WD GREEN M.SATA SSD 240GB read/write upto 500mbps

 

Those speeds indicate how fast large files copy/move. For games and applications loading, you need to see IOPS in SSD spec/benchmark because small small files constitute big games, which is usually less for WD green drivecomparing to samsung 960 EVO.

 

See the table in this link for WD green drive (4kB Random Read & write) : https://www.anandtech.com/show/10748/western-digital-introduces-wd-blue-and-wd-green-ssds

See the last spec table in this link for 960 EVO (4kB Random Read & write) : https://www.anandtech.com/show/10698/samsung-announces-960-pro-and-960-evo-m2-pcie-ssds

 

(That random read is for OS, games, applications' loading times, random write is for installation of games, softwares, etc.)

 

These are general measure not particular to any games or applications, but you get the idea of difference in values. It's huge.

 

This is why my friend, in our India, WD Green/Blue, Kingston A400, SanDisk costs less than Crucial MX500, Samsung 850/860/950/960, etc

[Eigenvektor]

Just now, NAVEEN KUMAR said:

No it is a single stick corsair vengeance 8gb ddr4 2400mhz

In that case a second stick to get dual channel is probably worth more than going 3000 MHz. Not sure if it'll really help with load times though.

 

For the sake of comparison: I just opened the game and loaded into single player. My load time was around 35 seconds.

RX 480, i5 3570K, 16 GB DDR3 (2x8, 1333 MHz), Samsung SSD 840

[NAVEEN KUMAR]

Can u please pull a 8 gig stick and do a another benchmark please so that I can decide to upgrade with ram or go for a evo960 ssd please

[Eigenvektor]

18 minutes ago, NAVEEN KUMAR said:

Can u please pull a 8 gig stick and do a another benchmark please so that I can decide to upgrade with ram or go for a evo960 ssd please

With 1x8 GB of RAM my load time from clicking "Single Player" until I was loaded in the game was around 36 seconds, so no real difference. Since I simply use my phone's stop watch that's well within margin of error. Keep in mind that I have DDR3 running at 1333 MHz, so I'm already only about half as fast as your DDR4-2400.

 

I have no other programs open in the background etc. so e.g. if you do, that might also slow you down.

[NAVEEN KUMAR]

1 minute ago, Eigenvektor said:

With 1x8 GB of RAM my load time from clicking "Single Player" until I was loaded in the game was around 36 seconds, so no real difference. Since I simply use my phone's stop watch that's well within margin of error. Keep in mind that I have DDR3 running at 1333 MHz, so I'm already only about half as fast as your DDR4-2400.

 

I have no other programs open in the background etc. so e.g. if you do, that might also slow you down.

thank you Eigenvektor for the time you have spend with those benchmarking

so now i am clear with ram part

so the Crucial MX500 which has a 4kb random read of 95K IOPS vs a WD green with 4kb random read of 37K IOPS is the main cause for slow loading time on GTA V(offline)

so any thing above 100K IOPS will boost my loading time

once again heartly thanks to Eigenvektor

[daisy57561]

I want to know which games most forum members like                                                                                                                        subway surfers
 

[Ebony Falcon]

I have it on m.2 and it still takes ages 

the games is original a ps3 game remember