Jump to content

Hello everyone. 

 

I am planing to purchase and update my rig this week but I am extremely doubtfull with reference to my CPU. My plan is to purchase a 3960x + Asus Zenith 2 Extreme. Despite this fact, and due to its costs, I have seen a good deal in a 2950x + Zenith Extreme. My main question is wether or not can I install thunderbolt via a  GC Titan card or something similar. I have read that it is possible and not almost in the same article. 

 

Then my other option is to keep the same CPU but move to a Gigabyte Designare but, honestly, I hate the looks of this mobo. It is well priced and everything is great while you are not looking at it. It is a big problem IMO that this is the only Threadripper and Thunderbolt 3 compatible mobo. 

 

The 3rd option (i have been thinking a lot) is a i9 10900 + Rampage 6 Extreme Omega. I like this idea a lot but I am worried as there is no much to update in comparison to Threadripper 3. I will be stuck with 10 cores but I will get Thubderbolt 3 (and I will save some cash as I can keep my CPU waterblock). 

 

I am not sure at all but I need to take a decission. Also, in case I have to lose thunderbolt 3 compatibility, how would it be to transfer data to a Macbook Pro 16" and a windows laptop with USB 3.0 Type C and Thunderbolt? I am not sure if I understood it right but I think a Thunderbolt 3 port is also a USB 3.1 Gen1. Is it true?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1224174-new-build-threadripper-thunderbolt/
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

You wouldn't be able to use a Gigabyte card on an Asus board, they're design specific. The board you choose needs to be built with the TB expansion facility and you need to use the matching add-on card.

 

6 minutes ago, DefensivePepe said:

how would it be to transfer data to a Macbook Pro 16" and a windows laptop with USB 3.0 Type C and Thunderbolt?

Network?

 

7 minutes ago, DefensivePepe said:

I think a Thunderbolt 3 port is also a USB 3.1 Gen1. Is it true?

Gen 1 or 2, but yeah it's compatible with any USB peripheral.

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kilrah said:

You wouldn't be able to use a Gigabyte card on an Asus board, they're design specific. The board you choose needs to be built with the TB expansion facility and you need to use the matching add-on card.

 

Network?

 

Gen 1 or 2, but yeah it's compatible with any USB peripheral.

Well that´s obvious but I have seen many cases were GC Titan works perfectly on non compatible boards, the 5.1 Mac Pro, for instance. I want to connect everything by cable and I think it is easier to me to use a USB rather than an old RJ45 and adjust the network. Of course I thought about it but I am considering a long run computer to last for the next 5 years or so and I want to add as many new compatible technologies as possible. That´s why I am so worried about Intel, no PCIe 4.0, no upgrade... 

 

8 minutes ago, fuzz0r said:

What is your usecase?

Many different scenarios, work, gaming, media, photo and video editing, maybe even a home server. Of course, I know, I can go to a X570 with a Ryzen 7 or 9 and it will do but I want to be in the next level, it is 100% subjective.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DefensivePepe said:

rather than an old RJ45 and adjust the network.

Direct TB3 connection creates a network that you have to configure too, and from what I can read between a Mac and Windows you need to reconfigure it every time you unplug it. Not any neater.

F@H
Desktop: i9-13900K, ASUS Z790-E, 64GB DDR5-6000 CL36, RTX3080, 2TB MP600 Pro XT, 2TB SX8200Pro, 2x16TB Ironwolf RAID0, Corsair HX1200, Antec Vortex 360 AIO, Thermaltake Versa H25 TG, Samsung 4K curved 49" TV, 23" secondary, Mountain Everest Max

Mobile SFF rig: i9-9900K, Noctua NH-L9i, Asrock Z390 Phantom ITX-AC, 32GB, GTX1070, 2x1TB SX8200Pro RAID0, 2x5TB 2.5" HDD RAID0, Athena 500W Flex (Noctua fan), Custom 4.7l 3D printed case

 

Asus Zenbook UM325UA, Ryzen 7 5700u, 16GB, 1TB, OLED

 

GPD Win 2

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Kilrah said:

Direct TB3 connection creates a network that you have to configure too, and from what I can read between a Mac and Windows you need to reconfigure it every time you unplug it. Not any neater.

Yeah I know, it is a kind of pain as well but at least it gives me more confidance the fact of having it. Maybe after a while I prefer to trasnfer everything via an external HDD as I did while I was in college but I may need TB3 in the future and I am trying to do my best to have it now. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×