Any reliable AMD CPU List?

[Chiyawa]

Hi,

 

I'm currently looking for a good AMD CPU list other than the official list provided by AMD.com.

 

Okay, so far, what I get from AMD website:

- I need to get information. All the details of the CPU such as speed, cache, and many more. AMD only provide more recent processor in their website and it is hard to get information about old processor (Richland and before).

- Their list is a bit confusing. Some of the information are not even clear. For example, they don't list how many PCIe 4.0 lanes their 3rd Gen Ryzen Threadripper has or can handle, but they do list in their 3rd Gen Ryzen CPU which is PCIe Gen 4 x16 (but we know it is 24 lanes if include 4 lanes for the NVMe and 4 lanes for uplink and downlink to the chipset).

- They don't list L1 cache for a few of their processors (the latest Ryzen 4000 series APU for mobile)

- Can't find AMD A10 APU 5750M processor specification in the list.

- Release date is very vague and inconsistent. You got a release date of Q1 2019 for Ryzen 3000 mobile APU, but 2nd of Mar 2019 for Ryzen desktop 1000 series CPU.

- Some APU Graphic model only listed as AMD Radeon Graphics

 

So far I found that Wikipedia, TechPowerUp, and PassMark (Unfortunately, I don't know how to obtain the list from CPUid.com, which provide the popular CPU-Z benchmark software), and many of the details are quite conflicting. For example: The Code Name for third gen Ryzen Threadripper listed in TechPowerUp is Matisse while Wikipedia is Castle Peak. Even their L1 Cache value is different (TechPowerUp listed Ryzen 5 3600 having 96kB L1 cache per core while Wikipedia listed as 64kB L1 cache per core that tallies with the official specs from AMD.com).

 

So, anyone know which website has a more reliable and accurate information of AMD CPU and APU processors spec sheet?

 

Regards,

Chiyawa

[Eigenvektor]

46 minutes ago, Chiyawa said:

So far I found that Wikipedia, TechPowerUp, and PassMark (Unfortunately, I don't know how to obtain the list from CPUid.com, which provide the popular CPU-Z benchmark software), and many of the details are quite conflicting. For example: The Code Name for third gen Ryzen Threadripper listed in TechPowerUp is Matisse while Wikipedia is Castle Peak. Even their L1 Cache value is different (TechPowerUp listed Ryzen 5 3600 having 96kB L1 cache per core while Wikipedia listed as 64kB L1 cache per core that tallies with the official specs from AMD.com).

Matisse is 3rd gen Ryzen - https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/amd/cores/matisse

Castle Peak is 3rd gen Threadripper - https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/amd/cores/castle_peak

 

That's what Wikipedia says as well, as far as I can tell: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryzen#CPUs:_Matisse_(Ryzen)_and_Castle_Peak_(Ryzen_Threadripper)

 

As far as cache goes, it's quite possible TPU has got it wrong. I'd usually trust the manufacturer's specs.