How fast is it really ???

[RoryRB]

I was wondering compared to a gtx graphics card how fast is the 2200g's 8 integrated vega cores and is it more powerful than a gtx640 ???

[Levent]

there is no "GTX"640, GDDR5 variant of GT640 is around %130 faster than 2200Gs igpu.

[RoryRB]

19 minutes ago, Levent said:

there is no "GTX"640

That's an error from steam not me as i am only familiar with fairly recent technology.

And the reason i am asking is that Formula 1 2019 needs a ''GTX 460'' on the minimum requirements sheet and was wondering if it was powerful enough under extremely perfect conditions (16GB 3600, heavy overclocking with the dark rock pro 4, high end x570 motherboard)

[Origami Cactus]

11 minutes ago, Zvoid said:

That's an error from steam not me as i am only familiar with fairly recent technology.

And the reason i am asking is that Formula 1 2019 needs a ''GTX 460'' on the minimum requirements sheet and was wondering if it was powerful enough under extremely perfect conditions (16GB 3600, heavy overclocking with the dark rock pro 4, high end x570 motherboard)

It is probably fast enough. But if you are already getting all that expensive stuff, why 2200G?       3400G would be a better bet?

[Caennanu]

11 minutes ago, Zvoid said:

That's an error from steam not me as i am only familiar with fairly recent technology.

And the reason i am asking is that Formula 1 2019 needs a ''GTX 460'' on the minimum requirements sheet and was wondering if it was powerful enough under extremely perfect conditions (16GB 3600, heavy overclocking with the dark rock pro 4, high end x570 motherboard)

If perfect conditions, you wouldn't really pair a high end mainboard with a 2200G.

All in all, the response was right for the information given. Don't need to blame any one

 

And in terms of comparing, google is your friend

https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-460-vs-AMD-RX-Vega-8-Ryzen-iGPU/2167vsm441833

[RoryRB]

20 minutes ago, Origami Cactus said:

It is probably fast enough. But if you are already getting all that expensive stuff, why 2200G?       3400G would be a better bet?

To be completely honest i was trying to build a high end rig but ran out of money for the high end cpu and gpu so i went for the cheapest option that does both to save as much money as possible so i can save and get a 3600x/3700x/3800x and a coustom 5700xt or 2070 super.

[Origami Cactus]

Just now, Zvoid said:

To be completely honest i was trying to build a high end rig but ran out of money for the high end cpu and gpu so i went for the cheapest option that does both to save as much money as possible so i can save and get a 3600x/3700x/3800x and a coustom 5700xt or 2070 super.

Then yeah go with the 2200g. It is fast enough for 1080p 60fps medium at AAA games, so it should be enough to pretty much play any game.

[RoryRB]

1 minute ago, Origami Cactus said:

1080p 60fps

Yeah that's the issue, i got the expensive monitor i wanted for the final setup, its 1440p 144hz so i wont be gaming any time soon

[Origami Cactus]

5 minutes ago, Zvoid said:

Yeah that's the issue, i got the expensive monitor i wanted for the final setup, its 1440p 144hz so i wont be gaming any time soon

You can still play at 1080p at a 1440p monitor, it is fine. 
You probably won't get 144hz on AAA games, but you can still play fine.