.

[Priller]

I made a statement. You gave synthetic benchmark numbers to try to sway opinion? I provided proof that that ram can be slower then 1600 CL8 in a game. 

 

Ram higher then 2400 doesn't work on a high CPU OC OFTEN. CPU OC matters more. That ADATA ram has one place. OC competitions/benchmarks for RAM. In the real world the much cheaper Trident I linked is better most of the time and even that is not needed. The trident ram also sets "bench marking records". That ADATA ram is for suckers. It is just Trident like ram with bios changes and trident has better heatsinks (not that fancy heatsinks do much, people still usually blow air on them in competitions).

 

My 2133 cl10 shows lower latency is a synthetic then 1866 cl9. In a game? They are the same.  I don't even know if the performance gains are worth the 1.56v to be honest, and these high speed ram kits are running way more voltage then that.

 

I could care less if "most 2133 kits are cl10 11". Those kits are also made for suckers also. They are just 1600 1.5v 9-9-9-24 with a overclock and a over volt. Most are inferior to 1866 cl9 1.5v and most 1.5v 1600 cl9. I linked a ram kit that was 1.6v and 2133 cl9 for almost the same price as 1600 kits. And this kit won't screw over a max CPU overclock on Haswell. Not that I am recommending it for GAMING, but if you are gonna waste money on benchmarking ram? The trident is every bit as good and it will keep a max OC. Who cares if ram is slightly faster in a synthetic if the system is SLOWER.

 

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231617

 

I didn't quote synthetic benchmarks at all.

 

I posted response time in milliseconds.

[AHaskin14]

Ultra high operating frequencies, plus theyre gold colored which in marketing means you can up the price